Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys,

 

Quick question. I bought a 2014 Sierra SLT last week and took it up north to the cabin over the weekend. I drove through a lot of rain throughout the whole weekend. The truck was 2 days old with 400 miles on it and I noticed the inside of both healights were foggy one night, towards the bottom over the LED running light.

 

Has anyone had this issue? Or has anyone herd of this being a problem?

 

I am taking it back to the dealer this week for some gm accessories so I am interested to see what they say.

 

Posted

Also, new to the site. Here is my truck so far.

 

Crew cab, standard box, SLT, 20% tint on front sides, 20% over factory in rear slider.

 

This week - 6" oval side steps and color matched GM mud flaps.

 

Next week - color matched tailgate handle, mirrors (leaving the chrome cap) weathertechs, access bed cover, GM bed mat.

 

Eventually - color match the factory flares and GM 22s

 

So far I love the truck, 800 miles on it over the weekend, averaging 18.5 mpg. Only complaint is the headlight issue.

 

 

IMG_0531.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

I noticed this on one light as well on my LED running lights. when I pulled into the garage during rain. It went away quick... I think the lights have little vents somewhere.

 

Did your lights clear up quick? I wouldn't be too concerned if it did...

Posted

I noticed this on one light as well on my LED running lights. when I pulled into the garage during rain. It went away quick... I think the lights have little vents somewhere.

 

Did your lights clear up quick? I wouldn't be too concerned if it did...

 

Yea it seemed to have dried up the next morning.

Posted (edited)

All I can say is I did notice it once... but really haven't felt a need to bring it up to the dealer yet.....and I do "bring up" most everything... lol. It did clear up quickly on it's own. If you do talk to the dealer.. let us know what happens.

Edited by GMC-AT
Posted

I went to the dealer tonight to get my running boards and mud flaps installed and brought up the headlight issues. They hadn't herd of that before but offered to replace the headlights. They'll be in Thursday.

Posted

When I removed my headlights and mounted my HID ballasts to them, I didn't see any vents or openings. In fact the round cap to access the bulb has a rubber gasket to make it seal when closed.

 

If the truck was assembled or the housings were opened on a day with high humidity, the moisture in the air can become trapped and cause your lights to fog up. After I installed my HID's (in south Louisiana where the humidity is always high), I noticed mine had some fog build up.

 

Easiest way to fix is with a little nitrogen, if you have access to it. My company uses nitrogen in it's tools, so I just the hose in the housing's opening, let the gas flow for a min or so, & then closed them back up. No more moisture/fog problems.

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I noticed this on the first truck I test drove for 10min. I bought a different truck because of it. After the two and a half hour drive home it had moisture in the headlights to.

Posted

I have noticed this on mine once after a hard rain. Gone the next morning.

Posted

I'm thinking they're vented. Being HID's and having that much heat, combined with your clear lenses (not like my ancient ones that aren't completely see through) the vents allow for longer life of the lens and bulb. At least thats what Chrysler told me to tell their customers, including my dad when he bought his 300. The downfall to this would be the water spots that might accumulate behind the lens over time. Americans seem to be the only one doing this, neither european company i've worked for has started doing it. They always clear up real quick though.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2014 Silverado and just had the headlights replaced today. I noticed tonight that the new ones already had moister in them. And by the way it was raining. The chevy dealership told me they were a sealed unit so they shouldn't be doing that.

Posted

I'm thinking they're vented. Being HID's and having that much heat, combined with your clear lenses (not like my ancient ones that aren't completely see through) the vents allow for longer life of the lens and bulb. At least thats what Chrysler told me to tell their customers, including my dad when he bought his 300. The downfall to this would be the water spots that might accumulate behind the lens over time. Americans seem to be the only one doing this, neither european company i've worked for has started doing it. They always clear up real quick though.

Somebody is guilty of not reading post thoroughly

Posted (edited)

When I add my grill lights in the next month, I'll pull one out and go over it carefully to verify if they're sealed or not.

.

Edited by MotoMedic
Posted

Yes, I have the standard LT headlamps. The moisture was in the bottom "high-beam" lamps. This appeared right after the dealer washed the truck the day I bought it in late November. Have been keeping an eye on it. Winter season now, and have not seen any since.

Posted

So had the dealer check out my moisture in my Silverado headlights. They stated and I quote "no problem found. No bulletins found for this year model for this concern. Pervious year models indicated that a little moisture was normal and if after driving 20 minutes the moisture would evaporate."

 

You've got to be kidding me! Haha I find this funny because I don't know how they are comparing these to previous year models when they are a completely different body style and the headlights are different. I also owned a brand new 2011 Silverado and had no moisture in my headlights. GM let me down on this one.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...