Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

On my CCSB AT 6.2L (so had Rancho's to start) when I put the Bilsteins on in the "stock" position it lowered the front end 1/2 inch. Which was fine for me as I was lowering the truck anyways.

Posted

For those of you who have installed these at the max position, what tire on an 18 stock wheel are you running without cutting/trimming? Originally, I was looking at 295/65, but that was with a 2.25" level kit. Not sure those will still fit/look stuffed now that I'm looking more like less than a 2" level. These will be going on a 16 Sierra AT/X. I believe my stock wheel offset is +33.

 

Thanks

 

Jeremy

Posted

 

  • not sure if this question has been asked, didn't read through every post. has enyone put a 1/4" (1/4 = 1/2"?) spacer with their B1500 at top setting, and how does it ride. Trying to get my truck completely level and the 5100's still leaves me 1/2 shorter in the front.

 

Posted

I had 5100s on top setting with a 1/4" thick spacer on my '08 to get a full 2"+. The front was definitely stiffer than the stock Z71 shocks. I went back to the stock shocks on the rear after running the 5100s for a while. On a RCSB, stiffer shocks makes for an unforgiving ride.

Posted

Not sure who this will all help but I recently had my 5100s adjusted again and the truck seems to ride better for what I'll be doing 90% of the time. I have yet to hit any big potholes but the truck rides noticeably more comfortable. I previously had them set at the 3rd setting with a 1/4" spacer on top and still had 2-2.5" of rake and the front felt very stiff and "jittery" at most speeds on any surface that didn't seem perfectly flat. I just had them dropped down to the stock setting and added a 2" rc spcer and am now sitting with about .5-.75" of rake and no more jittery feel and much more comfortable. Doing what I did probably defeated the whole purpose of the 5100s but I guess we all gotta learn one way or another, but they will be staying on at the stock setting from here on out. I forgot to mention I am also running a 2" rear block with the 5100s on the rear. I know it's not super "technical" but that's just my observations

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah, I defiantly notice a big difference using the b1500's over the Ranchos with a rough country spacer. There is a stretch of road on my commute that has some bad pot holes. Before my truck would bounce off the road, now with the B1500's I just glide right over them. Of course if I just slowed down then It shouldn't matter, but what fun is that. So, I'm at the top setting. I think I'll leave it alone since Bilstein engineered them to be installed with no additional spacers. 285 65 18's are going on as soon as I burn off the factory rubber. Thanks for the input.

Posted

I've been holding off a little bit to let the dust settle on all the new shocks coming out for these trucks. I have a 2015 Silverado Regular Cab Short Box 2wd Blackout Edition. The problem is, with the 20" wheels, every bridge expansion joint I encounter at under 40mph makes for a sharp "bang" when I go over them. I don't like how this treats my dash and other interior pieces.

 

With that being said, what shocks are going to provide me with the softest ride possible? I never haul anything and my truck is just a commuter. If I could get the velvet ride of my '70 C10, I would be estatic. :)

  • Like 1
Posted

 

So now we're expecting delivery dates in early 2017 for the 6112 Coilover for Ford & GM...?

 

Are you sure Bilstein is going to get these out before the 2018 Silverado comes out???

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I've been holding off a little bit to let the dust settle on all the new shocks coming out for these trucks. I have a 2015 Silverado Regular Cab Short Box 2wd Blackout Edition. The problem is, with the 20" wheels, every bridge expansion joint I encounter at under 40mph makes for a sharp "bang" when I go over them. I don't like how this treats my dash and other interior pieces.

 

With that being said, what shocks are going to provide me with the softest ride possible? I never haul anything and my truck is just a commuter. If I could get the velvet ride of my '70 C10, I would be estatic

I think if you go with the Bilstein 1500's you will see a difference. My 1500s are at the top setting (2" lift) when going over potholes/big stuff like it handles well, but small stuff on the freeway like ripples in the road, my truck picks them up bad vibrating the steering wheel, that's rolling on 18's. Since you will keep level?? the bilsteins may help you. The 20/s are a killer for bumps.

Edited by Bwoodkid
Posted

I've been holding off a little bit to let the dust settle on all the new shocks coming out for these trucks. I have a 2015 Silverado Regular Cab Short Box 2wd Blackout Edition. The problem is, with the 20" wheels, every bridge expansion joint I encounter at under 40mph makes for a sharp "bang" when I go over them. I don't like how this treats my dash and other interior pieces.

 

With that being said, what shocks are going to provide me with the softest ride possible? I never haul anything and my truck is just a commuter. If I could get the velvet ride of my '70 C10, I would be estatic. :)

 

 

No budget limit = Kings

Under 1000 = Bilstein 6112

Posted

Wait, I thought the 4600's were the softest, the 5100's were mid-grade (medium ride) and the 6112's were going to be the "off-road" shock with the harshest ride. Am I incorrect?

 

 

 

 

No budget limit = Kings

Under 1000 = Bilstein 6112

Posted

Wait, I thought the 4600's were the softest, the 5100's were mid-grade (medium ride) and the 6112's were going to be the "off-road" shock with the harshest ride. Am I incorrect?

 

 

 

No the 4600 should be the non-adjustable, 5100 is adjustable, and the 6112 is the new front coilovers.

 

In regards to the shock, I'd imagine the 6112 riding the best, then the 4600/5100 at the lowest setting, then the 5100 at the highest setting.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't care about adjustability. I like the rake my truck currently has. I just want a suspension setup that will mimick the ride qualities of a late 60's chevy truck. Even at the sacrifice of handling. These new trucks are just too firm/harsh for my liking.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't care about adjustability. I like the rake my truck currently has. I just want a suspension setup that will mimick the ride qualities of a late 60's chevy truck. Even at the sacrifice of handling. These new trucks are just too firm/harsh for my

liking.

Im in the same boat as you. I want the smoothest ride possible. Why is everyone taking the 6112 into consideration when it doesnt even exist yet? Or am i missing something?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,974
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gilkey96
    Newest Member
    Gilkey96
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 788 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...