Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why not upgrade to the new 2016 3/4 and 1 ton headlights there HID from GMC ?

Posted

Why not upgrade to the new 2016 3/4 and 1 ton headlights there HID from GMC ?

I tried that approach. The dealership and GM both said "no way".

Posted

I tried that approach. The dealership and GM both said "no way".

No why what? we did it with our harness, dealer are only good at sealing new cars and trucks, and some times not that.

Posted

No why what? we did it with our harness, dealer are only good at sealing new cars and trucks, and some times not that.

No way they would do it. I provided them with info from another dealership in Wisconsin that did this for one of their customers. I was then advised that "A lot of people got in trouble over that", and they refused to do it. Tired of trying to get them to do something about it, so I'm going aftermarket.

Posted

No way they would do it. I provided them with info from another dealership in Wisconsin that did this for one of their customers. I was then advised that "A lot of people got in trouble over that", and they refused to do it. Tired of trying to get them to do something about it, so I'm going aftermarket.

Most aftermarket dont last as long as OEM, but if that's what you like go for it by all means.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

2cc1f0167bbf08bfe3a82a0b21c17c80.jpgc4f27bf2210d88bf1939dd02c43e8138.jpg0b178d12c81887d009402e1a4676a52f.jpgbb8076dcaa1f3dda189c27165d295aa5.jpg3d416aa60af5063530cf4be9ba6c5657.jpgd67d6d1ae2b1b3f4bad3510855236d6a.jpg

 

Both with and without fogs. Brighter pictures are with both on. The lower light pics are just headlights

 

Where did you get your projectors?

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Interesting thread!! I'm going to be trading my weak-ass lows for LEDs, but I also want to "upgrade" my highs to ones that "will burn the eyeballs out of skulls from beyond the horizon." Any suggestions?

  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 10/1/2016 at 8:16 AM, Sean D said:
On 2/7/2016 at 12:26 AM, BootyHunter86 said:

2cc1f0167bbf08bfe3a82a0b21c17c80.jpgc4f27bf2210d88bf1939dd02c43e8138.jpg0b178d12c81887d009402e1a4676a52f.jpgbb8076dcaa1f3dda189c27165d295aa5.jpg3d416aa60af5063530cf4be9ba6c5657.jpgd67d6d1ae2b1b3f4bad3510855236d6a.jpg

 

Both with and without fogs. Brighter pictures are with both on. The lower light pics are just headlights

 

Where did you get your projectors?

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are your housings factory HID? I have a 2015 with halogens and want to go HID. I’d like to buy factory housings before trying a retrofit. What are you running in the pics above?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just bought a 2017 Sierra and it has T4F listed for the lights. It has HID for headlights and led for fog lights. When searching for led replacement I can’t find anything compatible. Is my only option to replace the whole lens with the factory led ones? I’m sure after market leds will come out at some point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 12/22/2017 at 11:55 AM, savagesultin said:

I just bought a 2017 Sierra and it has T4F listed for the lights. It has HID for headlights and led for fog lights. When searching for led replacement I can’t find anything compatible. Is my only option to replace the whole lens with the factory led ones? I’m sure after market leds will come out at some point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Morimoto has full LED headlamp assemblies if you want to cough up the $1600 for them.  I have no experience with the factory HID setup, but I just picked up a 17 SLT Premium that has the LED headlamp assemblies.  Guys seem to love these, but I'm underwhelmed with them.  My last truck was an 08 Silverado.  On that truck I replaced the stock bulbs with LED bulbs that were able to be rotated inside the housing so that they could be installed perfectly vertically, and the light from those was just amazing.  Moving from that truck to the 17 with the LED lights has been a big disappointment.  My low beams give a nice even distribution of light, but they don't have as much of it as the old truck.  The real disappointment though is the high beams.  With the 4 headlight system, the high beams gave me more light everywhere.  The road was brighter, plus the long distance lighting was significantly improved.  With the 17, the high beams just add light above the low-beam cutoff.  It doesn't add any light to the low beam area, and in fact, there's still a dark zone right above the low beam cutoff, which is exactly where I need the extra light the most.

 

long story short, I can't really say that moving to the OEM LED headlights is a worthwhile upgrade.  I can't really imagine a bulb upgrade in your current assemblies being any worse than the OEM LEDs, and in all likelihood, with the right bulb, should be better than the OEM LEDs.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

This thread made me wonder, why the hell are headlight assemblies so expensive.

 

molded plastic, some glass, mirrors...where’s all the money going?

 

I’d assume they were $100/pair if I didn’t know any better.

Posted

Designing/testing the lense (so it forms the beam properly, doesn't overheat the light assembly, fits in available space, visually looks nice/different), moulds are expensive to make, and with more and more trucks needing different ones (as in they work for fewer model years), and with limited sales (as only a small fraction of owners swap out the oem ones), and then advertising, distribution/reseller markup, it's not surprising they are getting more expensive...

 

For my truck, the lens is good for at least '04 - '07 classic (probably more), and 1500/2500/3500 trucks.  Now, I think the 1500 is different from the 2500/3500 and they change every year...

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 6/8/2021 at 5:39 AM, davester said:

Designing/testing the lense (so it forms the beam properly, doesn't overheat the light assembly, fits in available space, visually looks nice/different), moulds are expensive to make, and with more and more trucks needing different ones (as in they work for fewer model years), and with limited sales (as only a small fraction of owners swap out the oem ones), and then advertising, distribution/reseller markup, it's not surprising they are getting more expensive...

 

For my truck, the lens is good for at least '04 - '07 classic (probably more), and 1500/2500/3500 trucks.  Now, I think the 1500 is different from the 2500/3500 and they change every year...

I was talking about the oem ones as well. They are very expensive to buy new oem headlights. With 100’s of thousands of them built, they should be cheap.

 

i mean it’s over $2k to buy 2 new headlights from the dealer I believe. On a $40k truck, in which over 100,000 were produced, the headlights are 8% or more of the cost of the vehicle? That makes no sense.

 

I totally understand they have to appease regulation and need testing, but they have to do that with a lot of stuff. Surely those costs are a drop in the bucket when dealing with that kind of volume.

 

I bet the only reason for it is wanting to avoid people buying the cheaper truck and throwing the better headlights on it, since headlights are nearly as important as wheels from a cosmetic standpoint.

Posted
6 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

I was talking about the oem ones as well. They are very expensive to buy new oem headlights. With 100’s of thousands of them built, they should be cheap.

 

i mean it’s over $2k to buy 2 new headlights from the dealer I believe. On a $40k truck, in which over 100,000 were produced, the headlights are 8% or more of the cost of the vehicle? That makes no sense.

 

I totally understand they have to appease regulation and need testing, but they have to do that with a lot of stuff. Surely those costs are a drop in the bucket when dealing with that kind of volume.

 

I bet the only reason for it is wanting to avoid people buying the cheaper truck and throwing the better headlights on it, since headlights are nearly as important as wheels from a cosmetic standpoint.

First, the cost of the part by itself isn't the fraction of cost of it on the vehicle.  IIRC, someone priced out a vehicle and it was about double to buy the parts for the vehicle vs buying the vehicle pre-assembled.

 

Second, people want them fancier.  A bunch of led's around the edge, that blink in a pattern, are brighter, more intricately designed, all costs more.  It may take more molds to fabricate, more time to assemble, etc.  And the lights may be embedded in the housing now, where they weren't before.  And even for GM, it becomes more expensive because they joined the rest in having separate body styles for 1500 vs 2500/3500 trucks.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...