Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, KMK454 said:

Anybody running 285/65/R20 on a stock height truck, no level? 

Im running 275/65/20 Cooper Stt Pro. stock height and good bit of room. You shouldnt have any issue with 285/65.

Posted

I'm running 35x12.5x20 Maxxis Buckshot 2.. no lift, no level.. cranked torsion bars 7 turns.. went up 1".. awesome tires.. 5 stars... had some snow and it ate it up like nothing.. 

Posted
285 75r18 on 18x9 with a +12 offset, the offset had me switching the stock keys for aftermarket torsion bar keys, so I could get the tire off the front mud flap at full lock.
IMG_1725.thumb.JPG.85805484af64235ce2ce206c97b791d3.JPG


What steps are these? Truck looks good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
18 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:

 


What steps are these? Truck looks good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Thanks man, Chassis Unlimited rock sliders, welded on. They are pure beef, rock solid steps, way over kill. Side crash protection might or might not be better...

I like them, no one else has them, they're 7 feet long, grip tape on the back to help get into the tool box with out slipping. There's like 500 lbs of added metal to the truck in this phone picture, put on Bilstein 5160's on the front, and they are great. 

IMG_1721.JPG

Posted

Signed up just to put this to rest. I took the plunge and put Nitto Ridge Grapplers on today in 285/65R20. Stock Duramax Denali wheels, no lift, no level, I only removed the lower air dam/valance. Zero rubbing at lock, forward or reverse, and no crank on the T bars

 

2015 2500 for reference

 

I hope this helps someone else since I searched forever and couldn’t get a good answer. 

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hey guys, 

I wanted to add my recent setup for reference.

2015 2500HD LT CCSB

Bars cranked up 2” and will be adding blocks in rear next to add a little more rake.

 

20x10 (-24) Anthem Off-Road A712 Defenders wrapped in Toyo Open Country RT’s in 305/55R20LT.

 

Trimmed lower valence and front bumper where it meets the valence.  Need to work on the fender liner front and rear of the front well and trim front factory mud flaps up near their innermost mounting point.  Should be good to go after that.

 

Keys are cranked almost all the way so I may go with an aftermarket key set.  I also have front shock spacers and a front differential drop spacer kit to install.

 

08DC45D6-EDE6-4E4B-8CF6-7F43D85EA7CB.thumb.jpeg.6f1432676425ac099f58f2e4926fca38.jpeg5CBD6FE4-90E8-49AE-B40B-1106F91BF764.thumb.jpeg.64d3965ecb67c7038eb8d6c848db4090.jpegDA54265A-6F5A-4B93-8AE6-D6BA05923B1B.thumb.jpeg.a81abb0d2d5ec0a07910c85fc574df0f.jpeg51890792-44C4-452F-B25D-38D987A4D92E.thumb.jpeg.08e06f49ca5a810068d0eac2b4b1d3eb.jpeg4864096E-CE9B-41DB-9309-28013A10D337.thumb.jpeg.d76b007c6bf1dbdaf116166a337506ca.jpeg

 

Posted
On 12/28/2018 at 5:48 PM, Tech510 said:

 

20181103_134841.jpg

Looks cool, glad it works, too. I called a shop asking for a small level on stock keys with 35x12.50 install and they said they can only do 35s on Silverados with a 4" lift! I asked about the forum trucks on 35s and they said they don't work, drive bad, etc... yet here are examples of trucks that work. I'm ok with some small rubbing at full steering lock.

 

Interestingly, BFG 285/65/20 are a 34.5x11.20 equivalent, while BFG 35x12.50 are truly 34.5x12.50 (BFGs website shows their 35s being 34.5" in diameter). 

Posted

Thanks, I really like it.. worth every penny.. it actually drives really good.. I did a lot of research, and you're right.. they want you to put a 4" lift to fit them.. but that isnt needed.. Im sure mine works because I am running the stock 20's.. aftermarket have a different offset and it might cause the rub on the front bumper.. and if it did, I would shave down the bumper.. I dont know if I can go anything less than 35's after this..

Posted
On 11/14/2018 at 6:47 PM, jerseytaylor said:

Im running 275/65/20 Cooper Stt Pro. stock height and good bit of room. You shouldnt have any issue with 285/65.

That's good to hear, though somebody else on duramax forum is saying I need a 2" level to run them. In the interim, I did find this truck sitting on 285/65/20 BFGs and it claims to have some sort of level, though it appears to be quite subtle. I wonder if they would fit at stock stance. My truck has a good bit of rake.

 

File0_037440_800600.jpg

 

File0_050962_800600.jpg

 

File0_041509_800600.jpg

Posted
5 hours ago, KMK454 said:

That's good to hear, though somebody else on duramax forum is saying I need a 2" level to run them. In the interim, I did find this truck sitting on 285/65/20 BFGs and it claims to have some sort of level, though it appears to be quite subtle. I wonder if they would fit at stock stance. My truck has a good bit of rake.

 

File0_037440_800600.jpg

 

File0_050962_800600.jpg

 

File0_041509_800600.jpg

the closer and closer you get to that somewhat unreliable/unknown max tire size (everybody seems to say something different), do take into account the tire manufacturer as you know- some run larger and smaller etc.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I like @KMK454  ‘s  truck, but I’m biased. I’ve always liked silver trucks. 

2DD084AE-71A7-4294-9388-07AA9F94EBDE.jpeg

Edited by gearheadesw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...