Jump to content

anyone having ball joint issues with the 3.5 rough country?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, considering a 3.5" RC lift and have seen some random complaints on the old interwebs and facebook about having to regularly replace ball joints with this lift added... can anyone substantiate or chime in to these possible issues?

Posted

Also wondering if this is a true 3.5" lift? Ive heard the rc 7.5 is really about a 6"

Posted

buddys 2007 chev with the 3.5 lift was really only 3. put in new uca when the lift was installed and front end alignment. 25000 kilometers later and both uca ball joints are screwed

Posted

On my 2011 GMC Sierra CCSB I put the 3.5 inch RC with new UCA's, shocks, and all.. and after 5,000 miles one ball joint went bad. Replaced with MOOG then at 30,000 miles the other went bad. Replaced with MOOG and traded truck in at 36,000 miles. (I purchased the truck new and put lift on with about 750 miles on the truck.) It did look pretty sweet though, kinda miss the truck so I'm going to throw in a pic!

 

post-152988-0-41749100-1458222403_thumb.jpg

 

I really like the 2in RC level I have on my '16 GMC currently. If I was you, I'd go with a 4 inch lift or stick with a level. You can clear some pretty large tires with a leveling kit on these new trucks. I have 285's and they have PLENTY of room, no rubbing whatsoever. I would also advise not to get anything larger than a 2.5 inch level and most on here would agree.

 

Whether you decide to get a lift or level, post pics!

post-152988-0-41749100-1458222403_thumb.jpg

post-152988-0-41749100-1458222403_thumb.jpg

post-152988-0-41749100-1458222403_thumb.jpg

Posted

I had the rc 3.5 on my 2010 silverado. No problems but I also did not use the strut spacer. I bought the bilstein 5100 hight adjustable struts. Had general grabbers 33x12.5r17. But I also used a taller block in the back than the one that comes in the kit. Also had the trim the uca mounts because of a rubbing issue. I also installed moog ball joints at the time of installation.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Replaced LBJ at 63k with no mods. Now @ 78k and still no mods LBJ's bad again. Don  think the lift is the problem. Not saying it' helps but mine had no mods and have gone through a OEM set and an after market set. Don  know what it could be.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sounds like converting will be a bigger endeavor than I was thinking. This truck doesn't have 2Hi like the Suburban did. The Tahoe has 4Hi and 4Lo and a button to turn of traction control.   From what I understand the Stabilitrak uses open diff in the front and rear. When wheel speed is not the same the stabilitrak uses the ABS system to slowdown the spinning wheel(s) to transfer power to the slower non-spinning wheel(s). I thought the transfer case was open too. Being able to transfer power either more to front or rear depending on wheel spin. Maybe I miss understood some information with you saying and power transfer is 50-50. Thanks
    • My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...