Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That looks pretty nice. I am still trying to figure out if I want to do it to my chevy. What did it run ya if you don't mind me asking?

It all depends on how much you get the Cluster for and what programming you want to do...

 

An estimate price for mine was about, 700$... I installed it myself so you can take the cost of that away lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

It all depends on how much you get the Cluster for and what programming you want to do...

 

An estimate price for mine was about, 700$... I installed it myself so you can take the cost of that away lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thank you for that information i will probably have a shop do it along with the apline upgrade for the gmc. Dont care much for the chevy blue.
Posted

thank you for that information i will probably have a shop do it along with the apline upgrade for the gmc. Dont care much for the chevy blue.

 

 

Just don't let the shop touch it until we are done with it, if they put it in and try to mess with it they own it lol

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Just don't let the shop touch it until we are done with it, if they put it in and try to mess with it they own it lol

Thats for sure, do you think the cluster from the 16 esclade will fit? Also can you send me a pm of cost of programming, also can it be programmed to display what the ecm sees kinda like a scan tool? I do know to send you the info on the cluster prior to buying it

Posted

I am still looking for a cluster! If anyone finds/or wants to sell their 2016 Denali Instrument Cluster let me know!

Posted

Has anyone done this on a 2017 Sierra? The 2017 Denali clusters are hard to find, I wonder if the 2016 cluster be compatible?

 

yes we have and not they aren't.

Posted

Chris, I was hoping you would jump in on this. I will drop you an email tomorrow during your business hours with my VIN and parts numbers to get some pricing. Thanks.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I know a few of you have been asking yes we will indeed begin taking orders again this weekend. Sorry we just got completely slammed like never before :)

Posted

I know a few of you have been asking yes we will indeed begin taking orders again this weekend. Sorry we just got completely slammed like never before :)

I screwed up and found out after sending you an email today about my 2014 sierra sle. I will resend the email tomorrow morning. Sorry about that

Posted

If only they were diesel clusters

 

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

 

 

Well... if you don't care if your tach goes to 6K instead of 5K... I can make these work just the same ;)

Posted

Do same rules apply here for.a 2016 Yukon ? SLT wanting Denali cluster. Thank s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...