Jump to content

If it ain't broke why fixit?


Debra in Cali

Recommended Posts

Posted

Southern Silverado Guy 85, So what it roll coal? That is term that I have never heard of.

 

It's done with diesels. It's a current fad. But, you know how when you see a diesel blow black smoke when the throttle is floored. I don't think new diesels do it I don't think or it's think black if they do. But, you mainly see it with commercial trucks. Well rolling coal is making the engine blow that thick black smoke all the time no matter how much throttle they give it. I don't know exactly what's done, but I think it's just a tune where it dumps more fuel than is needed so they're literally blowing money out of the tailpipe because it's unburnt fuel. It does absolutely nothing for performance. They do it because they think it's cool to do.

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

It's done with diesels. It's a current fad. But, you know how when you see a diesel blow black smoke when the throttle is floored. I don't think new diesels do it I don't think or it's think black if they do. But, you mainly see it with commercial trucks. Well rolling coal is making the engine blow that thick black smoke all the time no matter how much throttle they give it. I don't know exactly what's done, but I think it's just a tune where it dumps more fuel than is needed so they're literally blowing money out of the tailpipe because it's unburnt fuel. It does absolutely nothing for performance. They do it because they think it's cool to do.

Oh that explains it. No, the new diesels don't do that. At least mine doesn't do it. Now the local school buses...that is a different matter altogether. I know that my son took off/disconnected his Def system that scrubs the diesel exhaust much like a catalytic converter does for a gasoline engine. Well that ended up costing him some major money because he had to pay for the repairs and I think that he had to get his engine reprogramed. Not 100% sure all what he had to do to fix it so that it would pass smog. All I know is that he was doing a lot of whining about how much of a hassle it was and how much it cost him to get it fixed. Don't think that he will be doing that again soon. And no he is not allowed to even drive my new truck.

Posted

Oh that explains it. No, the new diesels don't do that. At least mine doesn't do it. Now the local school buses...that is a different matter altogether. I know that my son took off/disconnected his Def system that scrubs the diesel exhaust much like a catalytic converter does for a gasoline engine. Well that ended up costing him some major money because he had to pay for the repairs and I think that he had to get his engine reprogramed. Not 100% sure all what he had to do to fix it so that it would pass smog. All I know is that he was doing a lot of whining about how much of a hassle it was and how much it cost him to get it fixed. Don't think that he will be doing that again soon. And no he is not allowed to even drive my new truck.

 

It's done with new too, after deleting and add a tune. That's why I'll stay with gas trucks.
Posted

come on dudes I KNOW you want that gentlemens GM Borla CatBack Dual exhaust system. Git up off dat wallet and git u one...tight wads

 

 

 

 

this is nice. :thumbs:

 

After years of carbs and TBI, needing to be modded daily..

it seems the last thing left is tires and exhaust. I don't mess with much for vehicles 20 years old onward to today.

 

my locale and mufflers..terrible. The big flowmaster is a good item. Borla is just that: borla. A lot of money.

 

I play with stainless if I am making it. My subaru is now 304, had to. Saved tons of money doing it myself.

Posted

come on dudes I KNOW you want that gentlemens GM Borla CatBack Dual exhaust system. Git up off dat wallet and git u one...tight wads

 

 

 

Best exhaust vid yet!

 

Well, guess I have a new mod to budget for :D

Posted

The only things that I would do (once it's paid for) is upgrade the headlights on my GMC Sierra, and maybe a performance tune for better throttle response, but that would be it. I would not throw big $$$ at a depreciating value.

Posted

The only things that I would do (once it's paid for) is upgrade the headlights on my GMC Sierra, and maybe a performance tune for better throttle response, but that would be it. I would not throw big $$$ at a depreciating value.

 

 

Sorry but I never understood the viewing of vehicle purchases as an investment. Exotic/rare things aside, they're not. I spend tons of time behind the wheel, as I'm sure many others here do. If I can do something to make my experience better, I will. I get the reluctance to do something major like a tune because of the potential warranty hassles but a level kit or upgraded lights, why not, assuming it won't be a financial burden? GM makes a good truck, as do the rest of the manufacturers (no matter how much most of us don't like admitting that haha). But they're not perfect. They have to design everything to meet strict longevity targets, ride quality and make it idiot proof as possible. I've put exhausts on every vehicle I've owned and see no reason to stop.

 

I'll probably be trading in the Jeep for a pickup next spring. Thankfully on direct trade in I'll come out quite nicely since Wranglers have some of the best retained value on the market but I'm sure I'll take a beating on selling off the bumpers, lights and other bits I tossed on to make the Jeep better for me. Whatever, they served their purpose for my time with it and whatever I can get for the mods will just get flipped to buy cool stuff for whatever comes next.

 

I don't keep vehicles for long so for me, the money is most certainly a waste from any analytical point of view but there are plenty of folks here who keep stuff for a long time- is that mod money really a waste then?

Posted

 

 

Sorry but I never understood the viewing of vehicle purchases as an investment. Exotic/rare things aside, they're not. I spend tons of time behind the wheel, as I'm sure many others here do. If I can do something to make my experience better, I will. I get the reluctance to do something major like a tune because of the potential warranty hassles but a level kit or upgraded lights, why not, assuming it won't be a financial burden?

 

I would upgrade the headlights because, as many know, the 14 /15 GMC Sierra have the worst headlamps on the market, so I'll do it for safety. The Tune is strictly for a better throttle response, also a safety issue as there have been many a time I needed to get up and go, and it fell on it's face.....all this will be done once I buy it out from the Lease, and no warranty issues to worry about. If I think about all the $$$ I spent on wheels, tires, exhaust, and engine builds on my past vehicles over the years instead of leaving things be, and instead, put the $$$ in some sort of investment (IRA...anything) :banghead:

Posted

Yup. Autos and Homes should never be purchased thinking that they are investments.

Posted

Im sure your kidding about homes. I have 4 rentals that are paid for, and provide a good return. I quit 401s after the 08 disaster. The last classic car I had provided me a 4K profit after 4 years of ownership. Overall I don't look at my car toys as an investment, gota have some fun. But I still don't do to bad.

 

Yup. Autos and Homes should never be purchased thinking that they are investments.

Posted

 

Im sure your kidding about homes. I have 4 rentals that are paid for, and provide a good return. I quit 401s after the 08 disaster. The last classic car I had provided me a 4K profit after 4 years of ownership. Overall I don't look at my car toys as an investment, gota have some fun. But I still don't do to bad.

 

Yup. Autos and Homes should never be purchased thinking that they are investments.

 

 

So you want to take a risk, eh?

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2014/05/10/why-your-home-is-not-a-good-investment/8900911/

Posted

We buy a vehicle and modify it simply because we like what we like, and what we like isnt really offered. You see a lot of it on these boards because ppl who buy it to just drive it as is, typically dont have reason to be here. A large driver of a forum like this is the sharing if information about mods and repairs.

Posted

Yeah the rolling Coal bit is behond me too, that's a real lack of consideration for the next generation. But to get back to the subject I like moding and making my truck mine. Little things that make it look different in a tasteful way. Like painting that wart on the roof they call satellite antenna body colour so it just kinda disappear..

Posted

Yup. Autos and Homes should never be purchased thinking that they are investments.

Dunno, bought my house in 79 for $34,500 it is now worth $295,000 so your saying is not exactly right Mr T

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...