Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

if you run the 87 oct tune, is it safe to run 89 oct?...

Posted (edited)

if you run the 87 oct tune, is it safe to run 89 oct?...

Yes, thats what I am currently doing.

Edited by AZ_SS
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks AZ.. i always wondered that... ..

Posted (edited)

 

Here is a post I made in another Diablo thread regarding TM:

 

The first time I tuned with the inTune i2 I turned upshift TM (torque management) off and went with the firm shift setting. While the shifts were firmer, they were randomly firmer. Every so often the 1-2 shift would be really firm and then sometimes soft. After doing more research on upshift TM I decided to turn it back on (stock setting). I think the shifting is more consistent now. Partial throttle shifts are a little more firm then stock and WOT shifts are firm but not harsh. This is what Mike on the DIablosport forum said about upshift TM:

"we often recommend leaving the upshift abuse mode TM enabled as it can lead to sloppy shift feel when disabled, as you may have discovered. TM on the engine side is already disabled in the tunes."

"this is TM specific to when the trans upshifts in 'abuse mode' meaning heavy throttle/WOT, leaving it on allows the pcm/tcm to make the shift smoother, turning it off removes any timing/throttle adjustments to smooth out the tune."

It sounds like there are two TM settings. One on the engine side and one on the transmission side. The engine TM is turned off in the canned ECM settings (87 or 91 tune). The transmission TM (upshift TM setting) is the only user selectable TM option and is under the advanced TCM settings. I plan to leave it on as I think it feels better and really don't see any reason to turn it off as I don't think it affects throttle response (power to the ground). Appears it simply pulls timing between shifts and turning it off can potentially cause slopping shifting.

 

I originally ran with TM off (disabled) and also noticed strange shift habits, normally under light load or a range of 20~40mph while light driving around town.

So I changed my original parameters from this :

12/21/2016

The settings I have used on my 2016 Silverado 5.3L 6 speed Auto w/ 3.42 gears are,

87 octane Performance tune.

Firm Shift Transmission tune - ON

DOD (AFM )- OFF

TORQUE Management - (OFF)

Throttle boost - (range is 0-25% ) I have it set at 3%, *Curious to know if anyone else has messed with this setting?

Adjusted + 50rpm in gear and + 50rpm in neutral and park.

 

Mods- Currently Running K&N Black Hawk Series CAI, w/ a full Banks Performance Stainless Steel cat back.

........................................................................................................................................................................

 

Now: as of 4/11/2017

87 octane Performance tune.

Firm Shift Transmission tune - ON

DOD (AFM )- OFF

TORQUE Management - *(ON)

Throttle boost - (range is 0-25% ) Now I have it set at *10%,

Adjusted + 50 rpm in gear and + 50 rpm in neutral and park.

 

Mods- Currently Running K&N Black Hawk Series CAI, w/ a full Banks Performance Stainless Steel cat back.

 

I did not notice any power lost on up shifts, and with the slight bump in the throttle boost, the truck kinda "feels" quicker?

Edited by jamoka3
  • Like 2
Posted

For those of you that have played around with the throttle boost parameter, have you noticed increased engine speed at idle? Maybe I'm not understanding exactly what the parameter does. With the stock tune my truck idles around 550 RPM when in park/neutral and 500 RPM when in gear. With the 87 Octane tune and throttle boost set to 10% the idle speeds change to around 900-1000 in park/neutral and in gear. Is this normal behavior when playing with throttle boost parameters or am I missing something?

Posted

For those of you that have played around with the throttle boost parameter, have you noticed increased engine speed at idle? Maybe I'm not understanding exactly what the parameter does. With the stock tune my truck idles around 550 RPM when in park/neutral and 500 RPM when in gear. With the 87 Octane tune and throttle boost set to 10% the idle speeds change to around 900-1000 in park/neutral and in gear. Is this normal behavior when playing with throttle boost parameters or am I missing something?

I used to run 20% throttle boost but right now I'm running torque management off so I turned the boost off (I'm basically just trying to feel what the individual settings are doing). I'm also trying to gain some mpg's back.

 

But to answer your question, when the throttle boost was on I did not notice a change in idle. Is it possible the truck was cold? I did however noticed it shifted higher in the RPM range with throttle boost on. I think what is happening is the throttle position is not being read properly so the tranny acts a little different. What I noticed most was the ease of driving in the highway - very little pedal input needed with throttle boost on for long highway trips. I loved having throttle boost at 20% but like I said, your mpg takes a hit.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

I used to run 20% throttle boost but right now I'm running torque management off so I turned the boost off (I'm basically just trying to feel what the individual settings are doing). I'm also trying to gain some mpg's back.

 

But to answer your question, when the throttle boost was on I did not notice a change in idle. Is it possible the truck was cold? I did however noticed it shifted higher in the RPM range with throttle boost on. I think what is happening is the throttle position is not being read properly so the tranny acts a little different. What I noticed most was the ease of driving in the highway - very little pedal input needed with throttle boost on for long highway trips. I loved having throttle boost at 20% but like I said, your mpg takes a hit.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

When I noticed the increased idle speed I'm sure the truck was warm, or it should have been. I took about a ten mile drive after I changed the tune parameters and it was about 75 degrees last night. I stopped by my buddy's house because he was outside and I was talking to him and that's when I noticed the difference in the idle speed. Also the temp gauge was reading around 210 degrees while doing so. I re-installed the stock tune when I got home and things were normal again. I may try to re-install the 87 Octane tune and adjust the parameters again and see what happens. I was thinking the way the parameter worked was that as soon as the throttle was pressed it would immediately advance X% forward, i.e. would jump from 0% to 10% throttle as soon as pedal was mashed. Mine acted like the throttle position was moved from 0 to 10% and that is the minimum that it would go down to. But then again, maybe I'm not understanding what the parameter actually changes.

Posted

 

When I noticed the increased idle speed I'm sure the truck was warm, or it should have been. I took about a ten mile drive after I changed the tune parameters and it was about 75 degrees last night. I stopped by my buddy's house because he was outside and I was talking to him and that's when I noticed the difference in the idle speed. Also the temp gauge was reading around 210 degrees while doing so. I re-installed the stock tune when I got home and things were normal again. I may try to re-install the 87 Octane tune and adjust the parameters again and see what happens. I was thinking the way the parameter worked was that as soon as the throttle was pressed it would immediately advance X% forward, i.e. would jump from 0% to 10% throttle as soon as pedal was mashed. Mine acted like the throttle position was moved from 0 to 10% and that is the minimum that it would go down to. But then again, maybe I'm not understanding what the parameter actually changes.

Right, I think 0% throttle is still 0% if that makes sense. That's the way it felt anyway... I would give it another go and report back if you don't mind.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Right, I think 0% throttle is still 0% if that makes sense. That's the way it felt anyway... I would give it another go and report back if you don't mind.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

Okay, so after I re-installed the factory tune I installed the 87 Octane tune with the 10% throttle boost and everything seems to be normal now. It must have been a fluke when I changed it last time.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

 

I like it. I can tell there is a little more low end response when I need it. This plus the transmission holding lower gears longer helps a lot with acceleration.

So how high is your idle now at park and in gear with your adjustment

 

I get my tuner later today so trying to figure out the best settings. Im not a hot rodder. Just would like it to have a better idle and get better mpg's and I'll be happy. If anyone can recomend the setting to get that I'd appreciate it! Thanks.

 

Ive got 87, 91 and 93 octane down here and would like to use the 87 or 91 if I have too

Edited by SPrew94535
Posted

So how high is your idle now at park and in gear with your adjustment

 

I get my tuner later today so trying to figure out the best settings. Im not a hot rodder. Just would like it to have a better idle and get better mpg's and I'll be happy. If anyone can recomend the setting to get that I'd appreciate it! Thanks.

 

Ive got 87, 91 and 93 octane down here and would like to use the 87 or 91 if I have too

 

I have my idle RPM in both park and gear set to +50 RPM. I like this setting as it seems to have smoothed out the idle (especially when at a stop in gear with the AC on). I have the throttle boost set to +15% and this helped a lot with throttle response. Throttle boost did not affect my idle any. My fuel economy hasn't gone down any either. In fact my overall MPG is maybe even up a little. I drive mostly highway though.

 

Here is what I have mine set to:

- 87 octane flex tune

- Trans tune firm shift

- DOD off (V4 mode)

- Throttle boost +15%

- Idle park/neutral RPM +50

- Speed limit off

I had upshift torque management turned off and throttle boost at zero originally. I decided to turn upshift TM back on as it seemed to do nothing for throttle response and made for occasionally sloppy shifts. Throttle boost made the most difference. Later found out from the DiabloSport forum that the engine tunes disable engine torque management. It's built into either the 87 or 91 tune. The user selectable TM setting is the upshift TM setting and this is different the the engine torque management. This is what they said on the forum regarding upshift TM:

"we often recommend leaving the upshift abuse mode TM enabled as it can lead to sloppy shift feel when disabled, as you may have discovered. TM on the engine side is already disabled in the tunes."

"this is TM specific to when the trans upshifts in 'abuse mode' meaning heavy throttle/WOT, leaving it on allows the pcm/tcm to make the shift smoother, turning it off removes any timing/throttle adjustments to smooth out the tune."

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

So how high is your idle now at park and in gear with your adjustment

 

I get my tuner later today so trying to figure out the best settings. Im not a hot rodder. Just would like it to have a better idle and get better mpg's and I'll be happy. If anyone can recomend the setting to get that I'd appreciate it! Thanks.

 

Ive got 87, 91 and 93 octane down here and would like to use the 87 or 91 if I have too

I haven't messed with the idle at all yet, but as far as my other settings, I run the 87 octane tune with DOD/AFM off, 3% throttle boost, speedometer corrected, speed limiter off and trans firm shift on.

I flashed it back to stock to take it to the dealer this morning for my last free oil change of the 2 yr 24k mile deal and didn't really realize how much of a pig it drove like before.

As soon as i got out of the dealer I pulled around the parking lot, installed the tune again and was completely reminded of the changes that came when I first installed the tune.

My highway MPG has definitely gone up a couple MPG's and the city mileage is better as well. I have so many stop lights on my commute and such a heavy foot, that too much throttle boost just kills my MPG because I can't keep my foot out of it lol.

 

I'm already talking with Lew and will be doing a data log for him next week and getting a custom tune, I'll keep yall posted on those changes as well if anyone is interested.

Edited by tyrich88
  • Like 1
Posted

I haven't messed with the idle at all yet, but as far as my other settings, I run the 87 octane tune with DOD/AFM off, 3% throttle boost, speedometer corrected, speed limiter off and trans firm shift on.

I flashed it back to stock to take it to the dealer this morning for my last free oil change of the 2 yr 24k mile deal and didn't really realize how much of a pig it drove like before.

As soon as i got out of the dealer I pulled around the parking lot, installed the tune again and was completely reminded of the changes that came when I first installed the tune.

My highway MPG has definitely gone up a couple MPG's and the city mileage is better as well. I have so many stop lights on my commute and such a heavy foot, that too much throttle boost just kills my MPG because I can't keep my foot out of it lol.

 

I'm already talking with Lew and will be doing a data log for him next week and getting a custom tune, I'll keep yall posted on those changes as well if anyone is interested.

Posted

Please excuse my last post. Posting off a phone doesnt work sometimes. Ive noticed that people are deactivating the AFM. Any particular reason for doing this? Have you seen a drop in milage due to this? thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...