Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I just bought a 2016 Silverado LT Z71, what's the biggest tires I can put on it without a lift of leveling kit? It has 18" wheels now.

The answer is in this thread...there is no need to go look at a chart. 285/65r18 will fit with minimal to no rub on a stock truck. It also is the largest you can go with no rub on a leveled truck although lots of people on tis forum will put larger on....that doesn't mean they fit though. There is one guy running 305/60r18 with no claimed rub.

 

 

It's all relative to height and offset IMO

 

this is a 285/70/17, Bilstein 5100 all around, 17x9 +6 wheel...no front on shot unfortunately.

Relative to what? Your truck looks stock height, just like my leveled truck does. These trucks come so low to the ground that putting a level and a couple of size larger tires on them just makes them look like a factory 4x4 package.

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

I have 285/75 Toyo AT2's on my stock 18s. No problem. That's a 34.8 x 11.50. I'm only running a 2.25" readylift level. 66d20eaf64cca01ace6f30cb7b0d2d7a.jpg9587156ba914d6a571ddd60e8bd0800e.jpg16cfb9d804bc2ef6acaa455db15076e1.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

The answer is in this thread...there is no need to go look at a chart. 285/65r18 will fit with minimal to no rub on a stock truck. It also is the largest you can go with no rub on a leveled truck although lots of people on tis forum will put larger on....that doesn't mean they fit though. There is one guy running 305/60r18 with no claimed rub.

 

 

Relative to what? Your truck looks stock height, just like my leveled truck does. These trucks come so low to the ground that putting a level and a couple of size larger tires on them just makes them look like a factory 4x4 package.

 

You mentioned 285 doesn't look wide enough, it's relative to the trucks setup.

 

My trucks about 3.5" higher than stock, more noticeable in person. I agree these trucks are way too low in stock form, that's why I did the mods.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Just installed a set of 295/70r18 on stock rims on my 2017 silverado ltz. No rubing at all anywhere.

 

We would all like to believe you, but you would be the first ever to do that with a leveled truck. As a minimum, you are hitting the swaybar at full lock and most likely the UCAs too. Your liner is going to get wrecked too when you go over a bump at full lock.

Posted

It really depends on what brand of tire he's running. 295/70r18s can have large variances in size depending on the brand's spec. Sometimes almost whole inches.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 months later...
Posted

After 3000 pages of reading thinking I'm only going to do a 2" level up front and 1" block in the rear. 

 

Still unsure about adding shock extenders for the rear by adding the extra 1"

Posted
On 5/12/2017 at 7:36 PM, HoosierZ said:

285/65/18 Mastercraft Courser CXT, 2" level

 

13305942-4D5B-4CFC-B4CA-C0DB7F7E8BBA_zps

 

091C1793-AFBF-49DE-8784-B8F3774AE4D9_zps

i really like the looks and sits.whats your set up?

Posted
10 hours ago, MIDNITEZ71 said:

i really like the looks and sits.whats your set up?

It has a 2” level in the front, 18x9 +12 offset Black Rhino “Lucerne” wheels. I removed the plastic from the front bumper and built the skidplate. It has the GM aluminum skidplates and the running boards are DeeZee NXT crew cab length. 

Posted

So is most people running the 285/65/18 vs. 275/70/18? is that because the 275/70/18 is narrower?

Posted
On 11/29/2017 at 3:27 PM, FH212 said:

So is most people running the 285/65/18 vs. 275/70/18? is that because the 275/70/18 is narrower?

Yes.    Looks odd to me being so tall and narrow. 

Posted (edited)
On 11/29/2017 at 10:01 AM, chris15706 said:

IMG_0512.JPG
This is with a 2 inch level.

Looks perfect. Those are 285s? Taller rear block?

Edited by TravHaus
More questions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...