Jump to content

Disappointed with 2019


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Zeker said:

I had emailed Rangetechnology about if theirs would disable both the AFM and the start/stop. This was their reply:

 

"The AFM Disabler is compatible and should disable the AFM and the start/stop for you.

Please be sure to order directly from our website (www.rangetechnology.com) in order to get the latest and greatest firmware which you will need to work on a 2019 Chevy

Silverado Trail Boss."

 

So from that I would say it's been released but there's always the chance the rep didn't pay attention to the year...
 

I checked the Rangetechnology website, and they seem to have an OBDII based stop-start disabler but you have a dongle plugged into your OBDII port just to disable the stop-start. With the Auto Stop Eliminator, you're just plugging a wiring harness into the existing one of the truck behind the button and you'll never know it was installed unless you pulled the trim panel off and looked behind the switch. Plus you maintain the functionality of the system if you ever want to turn it back on. Rangetechnology doesn't support the 2019's for the AFM disabler as per their website yet. I attached a screenshot.

Screenshot (10).png

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
9 hours ago, GM Canadian Guy said:

I checked the Rangetechnology website, and they seem to have an OBDII based stop-start disabler but you have a dongle plugged into your OBDII port just to disable the stop-start. With the Auto Stop Eliminator, you're just plugging a wiring harness into the existing one of the truck behind the button and you'll never know it was installed unless you pulled the trim panel off and looked behind the switch. Plus you maintain the functionality of the system if you ever want to turn it back on. Rangetechnology doesn't support the 2019's for the AFM disabler as per their website yet. I attached a screenshot.

Screenshot (10).png

And if you keep scrolling down the page they are released and supported. I attached a screenshot

 

I like the module will disable both and can be easily removed should you need or want to.  Just my preference....

Range.JPG

Posted
1 hour ago, Zeker said:

And if you keep scrolling down the page they are released and supported. I attached a screenshot

 

I like the module will disable both and can be easily removed should you need or want to.  Just my preference....

Range.JPG

I think I like the obd one more. The installation process for the plug in module for disable start stop I feel like I could ding up some panels or make some rattling that I wouldnt want for the rest of my trucks life

Posted
And if you keep scrolling down the page they are released and supported. I attached a screenshot
 
I like the module will disable both and can be easily removed should you need or want to.  Just my preference....
Range.thumb.JPG.ae69903463d40a0cf99e3fb514cf6bb9.JPG
Hey there ya go! I must not have looked very hard. Yes if you don't care about being able to use your stop-start system the dongles a great way to go. Especially if it disables AFM/DFM. [emoji106][emoji6]
Posted
I think I like the obd one more. The installation process for the plug in module for disable start stop I feel like I could ding up some panels or make some rattling that I wouldnt want for the rest of my trucks life

Yes definitely, interior trim can be temperamental. I don't blame you for not wanting to take your dash apart.

 

I guess for me I like the factory look of not having a dongle with a bright LED in my truck all the time. Plus they will put a "slight" power draw on your system, although it would be minimal. I suppose if you don't like the LED at night you can always put electrical tape over it.

 

Posted

Hello all, I am in the market for my first truck and forums like these: GMC and Ram makes it difficult to get an objective review of the trucks because of the incredible amount of sour-grape/sweet-lemon rationalization.  Reminds me of the Harley Davidson forums where arguments surrounded Road Glide vs Street Glide, Touring vs Dyna, HD vs BMW vs Honda vs every other bike.  I think we forget these forums only represent a small sample size of vehicles sold yet every issue seems to be exaggerated.   And... the rationalization and comparisons continue beyond Ram vs Sierra to Sierra 6.2 vs Sierra 5.3.  

Here is my question... Would you purchase your Sierra for the price you got it for again?  I have been looking at the 19’ Sierra Denali—trying to get an out the door price around $55k... Is that reaching? Thank you in advance for your assistance.  Airborne all the way! 

Posted

I only buy GM trucks and used at that.

I would buy my truck again.

Denali? Not for me. The magneride would scare me due to repair costs.

Go one model lower.

:)

Posted

I overpaid for mine way back when there were 100s of 18s left on the lot. I’d buy it again but would prefer to pay 2019’s pricing!

 

55k for an Ultimate would maybe be reaching a by a grand or two, but a lesser equipped one should be doable.

Posted
4 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

I only buy GM trucks and used at that.

I would buy my truck again.

Denali? Not for me. The magneride would scare me due to repair costs.

Go one model lower.

:)

But it is like driving on a cloud :D I actually agree, active dampers are expensive when they go out.

Posted
1 hour ago, diyer2 said:

I only buy GM trucks and used at that.

I would buy my truck again.

Denali? Not for me. The magneride would scare me due to repair costs.

Go one model lower.

:)

The SLT would be a better buy in your opinion? I appreciate your response. Thank you. 

Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

I overpaid for mine way back when there were 100s of 18s left on the lot. I’d buy it again but would prefer to pay 2019’s pricing!

 

55k for an Ultimate would maybe be reaching a by a grand or two, but a lesser equipped one should be doable.

So 57k for an Ultimate? 55k for an SLT premium plus would be doeable? 

Posted

I’ve seen loaded SLTs with the 6.2 for 49. I would think a regular Denali without the 22s and power running boards could be had easily in the low to mid 50s from what I’ve seen people pay...

Posted
14 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

I’ve seen loaded SLTs with the 6.2 for 49. I would think a regular Denali without the 22s and power running boards could be had easily in the low to mid 50s from what I’ve seen people pay...

I never considered an SLT but I am currently considering one.  For me, I am not willing to pay over 55k out the door for the Denali - My thoughts are 2020s May drive the prices down a bit. ? I drove the Ram, one of best friends bought a loaded Longhorn and they are nice but I love the exterior of the GMC.  I do appreciate the input. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Wmoor004 said:

Hello all, I am in the market for my first truck and forums like these: GMC and Ram makes it difficult to get an objective review of the trucks because of the incredible amount of sour-grape/sweet-lemon rationalization.  Reminds me of the Harley Davidson forums where arguments surrounded Road Glide vs Street Glide, Touring vs Dyna, HD vs BMW vs Honda vs every other bike.  I think we forget these forums only represent a small sample size of vehicles sold yet every issue seems to be exaggerated.   And... the rationalization and comparisons continue beyond Ram vs Sierra to Sierra 6.2 vs Sierra 5.3.  

Here is my question... Would you purchase your Sierra for the price you got it for again?  I have been looking at the 19’ Sierra Denali—trying to get an out the door price around $55k... Is that reaching? Thank you in advance for your assistance.  Airborne all the way! 

Yes, I'd purchase mine again. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...