Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 1/23/2021 at 6:50 PM, Silvestrev88 said:

Took 4wheelparts 2 months to get my wheels and tires in. Had to switch wheels as well, the nv305 are in back order . Readylift 2 in leveling kit . Left the back alone . Tires are a 295/70/18, removed front mud flap and bracket that is inside of the valance .

619EE856-4CEB-4085-9028-D739746E6AED.jpeg

Dang love the look... 

Edited by Jp sierra
  • Thanks 1
Posted



Traded in my 16 All Terrain for this 21 RST. Drove the TB 6.2 but it just didn’t do it for me. Then I found this 6.2 with the performance intake and exhaust on it with the wheels and the hard cover. I had eibach on all 4 corners in my AT and man does this thing ride nice. 10 speed is also light years ahead of that 8 speed. The exhaust is perfect I think, super quiet normal driving and highway, but exercise the right foot and the beast is awakened! Had a Flowmaster on the AT and you just heard it all the time.  Last Chevy was a 95 Silvy, been GMC since, really notice the less options.  Gonna debadge, maybe upgrade the rear view, tint, and burn rubber!
0CC6C927-8B45-4E30-9A47-96B3F5BC2ED2.thumb.jpeg.445c392c4a769b1b515f9b1d5f9823e6.jpeg


I completely agree about the 6.2 with intake and exhaust. I love having it on my truck.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
20 hours ago, Jp sierra said:

?‍♀️ Why be negative... so no apologies needed bro... 

It's in my nature?  Naah.  I just am very disappointed in GM in how they are building ugly looking ******.  Cadillac has gone to hell because of how ugly the things are and no one will buy them, The new Tahoe and Suburban are a joke, so that just leaves Buick?  Which isn't doing well sales wise either.  Yes just my opinion but blah anyway.  

Posted
It's in my nature?  Naah.  I just am very disappointed in GM in how they are building ugly looking ******.  Cadillac has gone to hell because of how ugly the things are and no one will buy them, The new Tahoe and Suburban are a joke, so that just leaves Buick?  Which isn't doing well sales wise either.  Yes just my opinion but blah anyway.  
Actually, Buick is doing very well. You just need to look outside of the US sales number. China loves Buick. People with $100k seem to want the Escalade. It's selling. The Chevrolet Silverado is so ugly that it's gaining marketshare. If the GMC Sierra is ugly, then so is the new F150. If the SUVs are so ugly, then why are they the segment sales leader. If all you do is base your opinion on looks, then I'd hate to ask you about your opinion of people skin color. At the end of the day, it's not looks that determine value and worth, it's function. That applies to the outward appearance of vehicles and people. Just stopping hating and your life will be more positive. After all, nobody would've had anything to say to you about this.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Transient said:

Actually, Buick is doing very well. You just need to look outside of the US sales number. China loves Buick. People with $100k seem to want the Escalade. It's selling. The Chevrolet Silverado is so ugly that it's gaining marketshare. If the GMC Sierra is ugly, then so is the new F150. If the SUVs are so ugly, then why are they the segment sales leader. If all you do is base your opinion on looks, then I'd hate to ask you about your opinion of people skin color. At the end of the day, it's not looks that determine value and worth, it's function. That applies to the outward appearance of vehicles and people. Just stopping hating and your life will be more positive. After all, nobody would've had anything to say to you about this.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

I understand brother we all have are likes and dislikes, I just see the perceptive of someone who’s just signed off on a $50K+  to just have someone poo poo their ride ... and yes I agree GM is lagging behind Ford and Ram, the power in  those engines produce much more power ....makes gm 5.3 look wimpy ...and they have selectable lockers too... GM needs to step it up..but I do enjoy the ride and looks of my TB....I am a chevy loyalist I learned to drive with my dads 1969 C10 three, so I’ll keep buying chevys . 

 

Be well

Edited by Jp sierra
Posted

I don't really care about others opinions. They didn't pay for my truck. I have certain disdain for bad attitudes. It's one thing to disagree. It's another to smear poop all over the wall. Colossus is the latter.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
23 hours ago, Transient said:

I don't really care about others opinions. They didn't pay for my truck. I have certain disdain for bad attitudes. It's one thing to disagree. It's another to smear poop all over the wall. Colossus is the latter.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Dido

Posted (edited)
On 1/25/2021 at 5:51 PM, Colossus said:

It's in my nature?  Naah.  I just am very disappointed in GM in how they are building ugly looking ******.  Cadillac has gone to hell because of how ugly the things are and no one will buy them, The new Tahoe and Suburban are a joke, so that just leaves Buick?  Which isn't doing well sales wise either.  Yes just my opinion but blah anyway.  

 

Yeah, I have zero clue why Chevy has gone in the direction they have. They think it looks futuristic or something but the front ends on most of the new Silverado's & Tahoe's are laughably soft and awkward looking. It's like they are trying to pander to the pocket protector wearing grandpa demographic. GMC $hits all over Chevy in regards to the Yukon & Denali half tons this generation. Part of the problem is that they made the half tons a lot larger and roomier and with the short box like everyone on here has, the proportions are so off. Look frickin terrible. 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 6:14 PM, Transient said:

Chevrolet Silverado is so ugly that it's gaining marketshare. If the GMC Sierra is ugly, then so is the new F150. If the SUVs are so ugly, then why are they the segment sales leader.

 

Chevy has the most loyal customer base in the history of mankind. People would still buy them irrespective of how they look based on that badge on the front. It is what it is. 

 

GMC's are the best looking of all the trucks this go around and it ain't really close. I'd buy a Ford before I bought a Chevy though this gen (actually I would just buy an older vehicle or an SUV) and the RAM's look the worst of that group but sell the best. Again, what people base their decision off of going to be different for everyone. 

 

Yukons look fire this go round FWIW...

 

On 1/25/2021 at 8:35 PM, Jp sierra said:

I understand brother we all have are likes and dislikes, I just see the perceptive of someone who’s just signed off on a $50K+  to just have someone poo poo their ride

 

Isn't this a GM truck forum, to talk about GM trucks? Just because somebody interrupted youlls circle jerk doesn't mean he's wrong. I tried telling people a while back how soft and goofy the CCSB looks and got hit with similar reception. What's funny to me is that if you just spent 50K on something, wouldn't you be pretty assured with what you bought before you bought it? Seems like a lot of folks on here had no clue with what they were buying and get uber insecure when anyone has a differing opinion. 

 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 9:56 PM, Transient said:

I don't really care about others opinions. They didn't pay for my truck. I have certain disdain for bad attitudes. It's one thing to disagree. It's another to smear poop all over the wall. Colossus is the latter.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

 

In life there are plenty of people who are jealous of what others have and are just low life haters. In life there are also plenty of sheep who have never had a thought of their own and just want the flavor of the month. They seem to be tissue paper soft when that flavor is questioned...

Edited by superhighsierra
Posted
8 hours ago, superhighsierra said:

 

Yeah, I have zero clue why Chevy has gone in the direction they have. They think it looks futuristic or something but the front ends on most of the new Silverado's & Tahoe's are laughably soft and awkward looking. It's like they are trying to pander to the pocket protector wearing grandpa demographic. GMC $hits all over Chevy in regards to the Yukon & Denali half tons this generation. Part of the problem is that they made the half tons a lot larger and roomier and with the short box like everyone on here has, the proportions are so off. Look frickin terrible. 

 

 

Chevy has the most loyal customer base in the history of mankind. People would still buy them irrespective of how they look based on that badge on the front. It is what it is. 

 

GMC's are the best looking of all the trucks this go around and it ain't really close. I'd buy a Ford before I bought a Chevy though this gen (actually I would just buy an older vehicle or an SUV) and the RAM's look the worst of that group but sell the best. Again, what people base their decision off of going to be different for everyone. 

 

Yukons look fire this go round FWIW...

 

 

Isn't this a GM truck forum, to talk about GM trucks? Just because somebody interrupted youlls circle jerk doesn't mean he's wrong. I tried telling people a while back how soft and goofy the CCSB looks and got hit with similar reception. What's funny to me is that if you just spent 50K on something, wouldn't you be pretty assured with what you bought before you bought it? Seems like a lot of folks on here had no clue with what they were buying and get uber insecure when anyone has a differing opinion. 

 

 

 

In life there are plenty of people who are jealous of what others have and are just low life haters. In life there are also plenty of sheep who have never had a thought of their own and just want the flavor of the month. They seem to be tissue paper soft when that flavor is questioned...

I was also under the reasonable assumption that this was a forum for GM enthusiasts , Silverado’s and Sierra’s are both great looking trucks ... I guess we need  be losers and troll Ford and Ram forums to tell them how ugly F150’s and Ram’s are ,( which they are not ).. not going to happen because most of us can respect peoples choices .  Silverado’s are amazing looking and riding trucks , quite engines .... well not anymore I installed a S&B Intake and Borla muffler swap.

Posted

Chevy is on record that the goal was to make the Silverado look more sporty by adding some Camaro styling cues. The tabs, or dog ears as I call them, between the headlights and turn signals tied the new look into the look of the last generation Tahoe and Suburban. I hated those dog ears on the last generation utes. I think they did a much better job incorporating that look this time around, but it could've been without. When I look for historical reference at the new front end I see mid-1980s styling cues. Therefore, I think you're correct that Chevy was trying to hold onto the past loyalists, however that doesn't explain an increase in marketshare, imo. The new trucks also converted some people over. Yes, GMC is a sexy truck. They are also showing the most marketshare gains. However, if the Chevy is a pig, then the GMC is a pig with lipstick. Why spend $66k on a pig with lipstick when you can just buy the pig for $60k. Women will preach to us all day long about not judging something based on looks. They'll tell you all about how the perfect woman may be homely in looks. Will your wife win a beauty pageant? Likely not. Neither will mine. However, they look just fine to us, and can be counted on to fulfill whatever their role is, just like our trucks. At the end of the day, whether you insult a man's wife or a man's truck, is not going to end well. After all, the man has made a considerable investment in both (whether it be freedom or money, lol).

Note: the gender roles used above are not an attempt to be sexist, but to make a point. The genders can be interchanged and still make the same point.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Haha my last 3 were GMC and I think the GMC is the pig this time so bought a Chevy. If you just bought a vehicle on online reviews we would all drive rams because their interior is so cool and they have a locker button.  I actually quite like the buttons and not having to drill through menus...but to each their own I had 2 buddies go ram 1500 in the last 4 months, nice trucks, just not for me this time around!

 

Lots of killer rigs on here keep the pics coming so I can find new ways to spend money on my new truck! Cheers!

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Denali_Joe said:

 

Lots of killer rigs on here keep the pics coming so I can find new ways to spend money on my new truck! Cheers!

AMEN! Let’s get back posting pictures! ......Instead of all the other BS!
Have a blessed day people! 

  • Like 2
Posted

First post, bought back in may my 2020 cctb custom. So far I’ve done

k&n cold air intake

gm rear wheel liners

lund rain guards 

Weather guard tool box

debadged ( all but z71 )

 

 

B5D96B54-7B6A-4781-9A2A-5264991C2C76.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Did a photoshop of another Silverado. So had to get some shots of the trucks together 5c121a77f529bf3778fdb78aded1337e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...