Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, J-man67 said:

150k and stock bearings.  I have them ready to go as I know I'm getting close.  I'm extremely pleased with this truck.  She hasn't had an easy life and it's holding up just fine!

Hey Justin,

Good to hear from someone who hasn't had issues with that mileage.

Could you give some more details on your truck?

Interested in oil change intervals you did.

Oil and filter used.

Did you use Top Tier gas?

Did you use fuel system cleaners like Techron?

Catch Can?

 

:)

 

 

 

 

Posted

210,000 on my 04 that I bought brand new. 6 inch lift with 35's and still on the original bearings. Lift has been on since 05.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Gb steel said:

210,000 on my 04 that I bought brand new. 6 inch lift with 35's and still on the original bearings. Lift has been on since 05.

 

Lol well you have an ‘04 which has no “bearing” (pun intended ?) on this thread since we are talking Mexican built post-bailout junkbox GM trucks not ‘04s when GM actually gave a sh*t

Posted

Since the earlier trucks were brought into this discussion...my 99 1/2 GMT800 2500 went about 110k before the left front bearing slowly failed.  I sold my 2008 1500 to my brother with 140k and it was fine.  My 2014 1500 has 65k and no signs of bearing problems.

 

IMO, ball and roller bearing failures of any kind are difficult to diagnose most of the time.  Especially a sealed bearing.  But a sealed bearing has only a finite amount of grease it uses and sooner or later that grease gets to a point where its lubricating ability is below what is necessary, no matter how good the bearing is made. The quality and quantity of grease has as much to do with the bearing longetivity as the bearing itself, IMO.

 

The other thing I noted on my trucks was that I could not hear a bearing in the early to mid stages of failure with off-road tires, since the noise frequency is similar.  The bearing had to be pretty loose before I could tell.  And my experience with the GMT800 was that it took place over more than several thousand miles.

Posted (edited)

2016 GMC Sierra Denali (6.2L) with 70k miles - still on stock wheel bearings with no issues. I've got a 2" level in the front, but everything else is stock. I'll be swapping out my entire suspension this weekend for a 2.5" lift in the front and 1" lift in the rear.

2008 Cadillac Escalade (6.2L) sold with 200k miles - only had to replace 1 wheel bearing around 150k miles and did it with Timken.

2007 GMC Envoy Denali (5.3L) sold with 175k miles - only had to replace 1 wheel bearing around 100k miles and did it with Timken.

 

You made a good choice in replacing with Timken. They make great stuff and I've never had an issue with them. Keep in mind though, there are so many factors that go into wheel bearings failing - road conditions, off-roading, wheel/tire set-up (if spacers are used), etc. If everything is stock and you don't beat up the truck on bad roads or off-road you should get 100-150k miles. But it's also not super uncommon to have one go bad between 50-100k. Like any mechanical part, some just fail prematurely. Sorry for your luck.

Edited by midwestdenaliguy
  • 6 months later...
Posted

Front left wheel bearing on order now to my local mom & pop shop, creating a hell of a racket in noise.  Only 40k miles. 

Posted
On 10/28/2018 at 8:11 AM, J-man67 said:

150k and stock bearings.  I have them ready to go as I know I'm getting close.  I'm extremely pleased with this truck.  She hasn't had an easy life and it's holding up just fine!

Which truck are you talking about your 07 or the 15?

Posted

I had to do them on our Canyon at 80,000km (50,000 miles.) I was pretty disappointed in the OEM quality having to do them that early on a pavement-pounder. But what can you expect, most of the parts these days are made in China using inferior steels, probably by a child. Build them cheaper and charge double, keep up the good work and you will be crying to be bailed out again soon. 

Posted

 I agree the quality may have gone down and all parts can fail.

But a wheel bearing is no big deal to me.

Beats motor or trans issues.

:)

Posted
Which truck are you talking about your 07 or the 15?

The 15, but 90k with 35s on the 07 and bearings never failed. 04 Colorado with 87k and 33s and they remained tight then too. That truck did not have an easy life. This picture was the first day I had it. Temporary tag was submerged once I pulled through that mess.  

As of this weekend everything in the front end of the 15 was silent. I started hearing some chatter/popping similar to the sound of a bad strut or shock. Thought, "well, those lasted longer than I expected." Took a quick look and saw the my drive side sway bar end link sheared off at the control arm. Picked up a new one yesterday and will install today. Back in business. 200k here I come!

 

 

 

7d6b3f8d047109845104a0c7299528a6.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

 

91d808aadcd1a2844bcbcccf34f64fdc.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

The hardest part is loosening the 3 bolts that hold the assembly on. The are like 14 mm bolts but have only 15 mm heads for clearance to the drive shaft. Use a good socket ant try not to bugger them up. Use anti-sieze on everything and the next guy will appreciate you. You do need a 36 mm socket to listen your axle nut. Anti-sieze here to, but a drop of locktite for luck. Get the torque specs from 1A auto video.

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

2013 3500 DRW WT LML,  I am at 481,000 and my drivers side bearing started making noise today. All highway, 70% towing 8-16k lbs. Hope I can make it 500 miles back home.

Edited by Gdaddypops
Truck info added
  • Like 1
Posted

73k on my truck and no issues yet. Labor time should be no more than 1.5 hrs. Identifix says factory time is 1.5.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted

I have a theory on bearing failure on these so called "maintenance free" hubs.  Obviously on older vehicles where you had to pack grease at least everytime you did the brakes it kind of forced you to change them, inspect them or re-pack them and they lasted.  In the police fleet, we see some cars/trucks got 100,000 miles + on the original hubs without failure.  Some fail in as little as 15k.  This is with many sustained high speed runs in pursuits and just routine emergency response where speeds reach triple digit speeds multiple times just in one busy shift.

 

Now I know some designs are just faulty or at least less than desirable.  I think on average the GMT800 trucks showed higher than normal rates of failure compared to other vehicles than came before and after.  That being said, I'm convinced that duty cycle is a huge factor in bearing failure when there is no routine maintenance that can be performed.  In the police car world, I believe it comes down mostly to how many times and or how long the vehicle has been driven in water, mud, etc deep enough to submerge the hubs (which happens all the time on police cars believe it or not) over the life of that particular set of hubs.  Another factor is violent curb strikes, pot holes etc, rough roads, side loads from high speed cornering that occur during the life cycle of that particular hub or hubs.  

 

In trucks, all these same things can be variables with the addition of increased loads caused by larger wheels, tires, left kits etc.  When its just one side that fails, it could be a combo of duty cycle along with an extraordinary wheel strike on a curb, pothole or other road hazard, that you either don't know about because someone else was driving the vehicle, the vehicle was purchased used, or maybe you just forgot about that huge ladder you ran over on the highway 3 years ago that is just now catching up to your bearing hub?  

 

Not too different from someone that has engine failure 5 years and 100,000 miles later because jiffy lube started the engine without oil and let it run for 2 minutes before realizing their mistake, then filling it up with oil and sending it out the door with the customer none the wiser.  Engine is working fine at that moment but just lost 150,000 miles off its expected life...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,826
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tonwantonga
    Newest Member
    Tonwantonga
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 717 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • What I think you're saying is there is supply here at home, and in Venezuela, and we could ease pricing if only it were favorable to do so.   Well, yes?   But that's not the current market. Supply isn't what could someday exist, if only, it's what producers are willing to produce and sell at a certain price point.   The national price of single family homes would come way down if we'd just slap together a few million homes this summer.   RAM and GPUs would get a lot cheaper if we just set up some factories to produce a bunch more and stopped using it to build out AI data centers.    
    • The turn signal/multifunction switch is faulty.  I've seen a few of these go bad at work.  
    • I am experiecing the same issue, I have gone in the setting and disabled rain sensing function but I am still experiencing this. Whe i use my turn signal they will redomly turn on. Sometime they stay on and others times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop. Its super anoying, escpecially after a fresh wash. Anyone have any advice? . rain-sensing function, but I am still experiencing this issue Sometimes they stay on, and other times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop.It's super annoying, especially after a fresh wash.When I use my turn signal, they will randomly turn on. I am experiencing the same issue. I have gone into the settings and disabled the rain sensing function, but I am still experiencing this.
    • If we actually used any significant amount of that source in the USA then I'd agree but we don't. We've had that discussion before. We drill and pump more than we use. Thing is, we sell. We export. Gas and Crude. It's more profitable so any shortage here is self inflicted and LEGAL.    I worked a gas plant that has multiple fuel sources available and I worked in the furnace and boiler plant in that facility. I'd had days we swapped fuel types four times in a twelve hour shift which isn't done on supply but on margin. Two of the fuel sources are internally generated. Tail gas and DAK, both of which are sold as well a consumed. We always had more than we needed to run the process but we chose the fuel that produced the best margin not bought at the cheapest price always. A good bit of math to that and back in the time that was done on a slide rule.     I worked the Shale Oil Semiworks of Chevron Research and CONOCO Research in Salt Lake City. That process never went into production although it was very successful. Why? Did we lack oil bearing shale? Nope. Price of crude never made the margins work. That was in the late 70's early 80's. Remember history? What was happening then was a reaction to that situation. It didn't drive it. If so then it's easy. This isn't a supply and demand thing. This is a profit and margin thing and AI rules that now.    In no refining situation that I was ever in would a bomb hitting a well anywhere in the world 'instantly' interrupt or even distress the supply. Most plants have more than a months worth of crude in the tank field and more in pumping stations. That yo-yo could play out over days, weeks and maybe months and have zero impact on plant operations. How many times has this been off and on in the last few months? These people and not stupid. These plants measure down time in hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. They are not sucking fumes or waiting on the next truckload with baited breath. Besides, as I noted, they are for the most part 'vertically integrated'. They own it from the dirt is sits in to the delivery rack and sometimes to the pump. It has a HUGE shock absorber built in. When production suffers, refining wins and when refining is winning exploration is killing. The rest of that crap in the news is a 'news cycle'. Government dipping in to reserves? Oil is stealing their milk money. There's a reason Chevron abandon Venezuela infrastructure and it had nothing to do with security of US citizens. Nationals run those plants. it has to do with MARGINS disappearing to corruption. They are in no hurry to return. Is there supply there? Oh yea. More than enough to offset what is bought in the middle east. Just isn't ???? Profitable.    We have supply. There are places in Illinois you can drive a pipe into the ground and run your homes natural gas furnace on it.    A refinery fire will gum up the supply works but not a localized war where the market is using a limited supply from. Now Europe, that's something other....
    • $4.00 a gallon here now.   Diesel nearly $5.00 again.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...