Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just got my 2019 Silverado Trail Boss, absolutely love the truck, it's a pleasure to drive. These trucks are supposed to be 450 pds lighter than the previous trucks , they have a new furl management system that actually works very well you don't notice it when it works. You do have the option to turn 

to turn it off. The truck has the same 5,3 L engine but the MPG is less than my 2014 truck. I guess my question is how come the mileage is less with all this less weight n better fuel management . I just put 500 miles on it all highway driving and the average fuel mileage was 18 

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
10 minutes ago, towdog333 said:

Just got my 2019 Silverado Trail Boss, absolutely love the truck, it's a pleasure to drive. These trucks are supposed to be 450 pds lighter than the previous trucks , they have a new furl management system that actually works very well you don't notice it when it works. You do have the option to turn 

to turn it off. The truck has the same 5,3 L engine but the MPG is less than my 2014 truck. I guess my question is how come the mileage is less with all this less weight n better fuel management . I just put 500 miles on it all highway driving and the average fuel mileage was 18 

 

It may have to do with the lift.  Was your last truck lifted?  The Trailboss does not get the same mpg as a non-lifted Silverado.

Posted

tires, lift, speed, wind conditions, winter gas blend

many things affect mileage. Give it a while longer to compare fully. You said it was all highway miles, at what speed? over 70 mph the mileage drops like a rock.

Posted

What was the average MPG on your '14?

The K2's range anywhere from 15-16mpg to 18-19mpg average depending on driving habits, engine and ratio.

Posted

Break-in, stock 33" tires, gearing, drag, winter gas, colder/more dense air, increased resistance from cold oils/fluids etc. 

 

Reasonably i would not expect more than a .25mpg improvement over a similar equipped K2. I used to do a 4 hour run with my old 4 speed 1998 5.7L 350 DCSB and would burn about 45L (11.8 usgal), My 2010 5.3L 6spd and AFM did roughly the same on 33" tires. My 2015 6.2L in the same trim with fuel management and 8 speed trans burns closer to 50L of Premium (13.2 usgal). Mind you i am making almost 200hp more than my 98 and am running larger 33" 10ply tires. My point is that fuel economy has not come a long way in reality, so in my opinion it is unreasonable to expect changes of 2 or 3 mpg out of such minor changes. You may see slightly better results in the V6 and V4 department, but most likely not in Trail Boss trim. 

Posted
22 hours ago, aseibel said:

tires, lift, speed, wind conditions, winter gas blend

many things affect mileage. Give it a while longer to compare fully. You said it was all highway miles, at what speed? over 70 mph the mileage drops like a rock.

The Trail Boss does have a 2" lift n the bigger tires and I understand that does factor in the mpg's

fuel mileage n yes the average speed was over 70. If anything you would think at least the mileage would be the same as my 2014 with the weight loss and fuel management n the 8 speed tranny

Posted
20 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

What was the average MPG on your '14?

The K2's range anywhere from 15-16mpg to 18-19mpg average depending on driving habits, engine and ratio.

My 14 got an average of 23 mpg on the highway

20 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

What was the average MPG on your '14?

The K2's range anywhere from 15-16mpg to 18-19mpg average depending on driving habits, engine and ratio.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, towdog333 said:

The Trail Boss does have a 2" lift n the bigger tires and I understand that does factor in the mpg's

fuel mileage n yes the average speed was over 70. If anything you would think at least the mileage would be the same as my 2014 with the weight loss and fuel management n the 8 speed tranny

your weight loss and transmission make less effect travelling at constant highway speeds. Those changes do more for city driving.

At 70+ you are fighting air resistance more than anything. your lift and tires hurt a lot in that instance. Remember the posted highway mileage on the window sticker is based on tests at 55mph. I'm sure you would have better mileage at lower speeds, and in town this truck should be pretty comparable if not better than your old one.

Posted
12 hours ago, Cmillerjr said:

I’m at 2200 miles on my Trail Boss, still averaging about 18 mpg. 

Your average is what highway or city driving or both

Posted
3 hours ago, aseibel said:

I'm sure you would have better mileage at lower speeds, and in town this truck should be pretty comparable if not better than your old one.

100% true. The highest speed limit in my neck of the woods is 55mph. My truck does good if you're around town and your average speed is around 40mph, i get readings as low as 11L/100km (21.4 us mpg) with the best ever being 9.9L/100km (23.75 us mpg) for the trucks first 500km, not lifted and on stock tires. As soon as i go on a highway drive, i drive around 67mph in the 55 zones with a few full throttle passes, my mileage takes a dump. I run around 12.8 to 13.5L/100 (18.4 and 17.4us mpg). When working the math by hand, actual fuel economy is usually 1mpg worse than the DIC states, in my experience anyway. 

 

I find it hilarious when people claim their lifted 6.2L with bolt-ons and a tune on 35" tires gets 25mpg.

 

If your 2019 is getting a hand calculated 18mpg on 33" tires while frequently seeing speeds North of 70mph, i would say that is pretty impressive, i know my truck wouldnt get that. Are your tires a D load or an E load? 

Posted
11 hours ago, towdog333 said:

Your average is what highway or city driving or both

That’s the average of both. 

Posted

The 2019 mpg ratings are lower or the same as the 2014-18 trucks depending on engine gear ratio.  This has been one of the main criticisms other than interior from the media.  GM says even though they are lighter trucks the size is larger and has to push more air out of the way.  I think GM really screwed up big especially toting the weight reduction and all the tech they put into the new engine cylinder deactivation but they have no improvements to show for it.  HP/TQ is same and MPG same or less.  GM trucks were always lower ride height than the competition and and now the 2019 GM trucks are now the same ride height as Ford, Ram, Nissan and Toyota but have less MPG than Ram and Ford.

Posted

My average over 2150 miles is 20.8 mpg.  I have gotten close to 24 mpg on the Highway!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...