Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I picked up the truck this evening. So far everything looks good. They knew I was going to be anal about the appearance and fit and function of this from the beginning and they did a real good job of preventing interior scratches and damage. They removed the rear seats and side pillars completely to do the work. Everything was put back well. I did see a slight bit of damage to the extreme rear edge of the headliner on the drivers side corner that looks like it was touching the cardboard and got a slight abrasion during transport in the cardboard box. That’s not worth complaining about. I will be bringing the rust I found up with GM and I’ll find out what if any compensation they offer if any  and counter with real world actual cost I’ve incurred.  After all of this it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they have sudden amnesia about all of this compensation they’ve been blowing up my tail for the last two months. 

  • Like 1
Posted
I picked up the truck this evening. So far everything looks good. They knew I was going to be anal about the appearance and fit and function of this from the beginning and they did a real good job of preventing interior scratches and damage. They removed the rear seats and side pillars completely to do the work. Everything was put back well. I did see a slight bit of damage to the extreme rear edge of the headliner on the drivers side corner that looks like it was touching the cardboard and got a slight abrasion during transport in the cardboard box. That’s not worth complaining about. I will be bringing the rust I found up with GM and I’ll find out what if any compensation they offer if any  and counter with real world actual cost I’ve incurred.  After all of this it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they have sudden amnesia about all of this compensation they’ve been blowing up my tail for the last two months. 
If you clearly qualify for lemon law, why not just ask for a repurchase with a replacement vehicle? The rust on the seats was what put mine over the edge as soon as I told them I wanted the rear seats replaced too or I was going to lemon law it. Repurchase followed shortly after that.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I might try that. I took lots of pictures. I’ve already sent in the lemon Law notice.  What bothers me more it the rust on the air bag actuators over the doors.  My dealership is telling me GM id going to have to replace the truck if it leaks again and that 79 days is way too long and should have had the parts within a week or two. 

Posted

Ok fellows. Just received a call from my Executive Customer Service Advisor.  She wanted to make sure the truck was repaired and I was satisfied.  I told her about the rust and she is trying to tell me that temperature changes cause the metal to rust.  She wants me to go back to the dealership and let them talk with GM Engineering about the rust.  I asked her about the compensation she touted throughout the entire process and she insulted me with a $100 GM Service Voucher offer.  I let her know that I'm used to being fed and having a few drinks before getting screwed.  She is now saying she never offered compensation and was only offering the service voucher as a gift.  I asked her about the two months of onstar and data and XM I've paid for but not received due to being in a loaner that didn't have said packages and she is saying she can offer 12 months of onstar but not data or XM and that's the best she can do.  I'm not at all satisfied with this and I'm now supposed to get a call from her manager within 48 hrs.  Who wants to take bets that said manager will never call me?  

  • Like 2
Posted

Quick update on my situation.  Took it to a new dealership after the previous dealership attempted to "seal" it with no success.  I was told if I took it to a new dealership they'd have to do a new diagnostic on it.  New dealership referenced a service bulletin that was out in January that said to apply sealant all the way across.  They said that the previous dealership only applied sealant in a three-inch section.  Picked it up last night, we'll see what happens when it rains.  I asked what the next step would be when it leaks again and they said they'd have to contact GM.  The saga continues...

Posted
15 hours ago, JohnCasey said:

I picked up the truck this evening. So far everything looks good. They knew I was going to be anal about the appearance and fit and function of this from the beginning and they did a real good job of preventing interior scratches and damage. They removed the rear seats and side pillars completely to do the work. Everything was put back well. I did see a slight bit of damage to the extreme rear edge of the headliner on the drivers side corner that looks like it was touching the cardboard and got a slight abrasion during transport in the cardboard box. That’s not worth complaining about. I will be bringing the rust I found up with GM and I’ll find out what if any compensation they offer if any  and counter with real world actual cost I’ve incurred.  After all of this it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they have sudden amnesia about all of this compensation they’ve been blowing up my tail for the last two months. 

i'm very curious what they offer.  I just want an extended warranty so I don't have to worry about other garbage from all of this. 

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Smitty said:

i'm very curious what they offer.  I just want an extended warranty so I don't have to worry about other garbage from all of this. 

I agree...I'm concerned just how long this "sealant job" is going to last. I don't want to be on the hook for all this myself in a few years...

  • Like 1
Posted

Just a little update on my situation. Truck been in the shop for the past five days trying to determine where the leak is coming from after my new window installation. No loaner car, what a pain. I got a call from GM today and I am quickly losing faith with them. My advisor seems to have his notes mixed up, does not listen to details. From my first call with him I told him I would like an extended warranty, he keeps saying I don't think we can do that. I told him, this cost GM $0.00 but gives the customer great piece of mind. Anyway, as i was talking with him today he out of the blue mentions he he going to send an email to one of his managers about a buyback. I'm certainly not holding my breath on that ever happening. So is this his thought process. No extended warranty but maybe a buyback? Funny!

  • Sad 1
Posted

My saga continues as well.  Over a week in the shop.  They did the initial "seal" per bulletin and that failed in less than 24 hours.  They removed the window and resealed it again let "cure" for 3 days, still leaks.  They wont give my truck back because it still leaks and  they have ordered a new window which is on back order for two weeks.  I have no faith in the replacement windows.  Ive opened a case with GM over a week ago but they have yet to call me back.  I feel like i have no options at this point.

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Ethan Fernaays said:

My saga continues as well.  Over a week in the shop.  They did the initial "seal" per bulletin and that failed in less than 24 hours.  They removed the window and resealed it again let "cure" for 3 days, still leaks.  They wont give my truck back because it still leaks and  they have ordered a new window which is on back order for two weeks.  I have no faith in the replacement windows.  Ive opened a case with GM over a week ago but they have yet to call me back.  I feel like i have no options at this point.

 

I just got mine back yesterday too, it's raining today so haven't seen if it leaks yet. If it does, I am trading it in on something else this weekend. Definitely not going to go through the BS GM and dealers are putting us through. I realize the grass isn't always greener but my truck has other issues on top of the window leak so I think it might be time to cut my losses. 

Edited by hotrodz37
  • Like 2
Posted

The lemon law lawyer I spoke with today has plenty of experience with Dodge and Fords. I can’t remember which but one has problems with the windshield leaking and the other with the Rear window.  It seems like a crap shoot whether you get a decent vehicle or a lemon these days. 

  • Like 1
Posted

So far so good here still. 6300 miles now, 2019 RST 2/19 build. Did my usual every 5th day hand wash and still no leaks. Not holding my breath though I know it’s gonna happen eventually [emoji58]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Ethan Fernaays said:

My saga continues as well.  Over a week in the shop.  They did the initial "seal" per bulletin and that failed in less than 24 hours.  They removed the window and resealed it again let "cure" for 3 days, still leaks.  They wont give my truck back because it still leaks and  they have ordered a new window which is on back order for two weeks.  I have no faith in the replacement windows.  Ive opened a case with GM over a week ago but they have yet to call me back.  I feel like i have no options at this point.

Get them to install a solid glass rear window  

Posted

My leak was "repaired" about 4 weeks ago on my 2019 Silverado 1500 at 5k miles.  It's been raining a lot here in Memphis recently and so far no more leaks, but it sucks that I have to check my back seat every time it rains just to be sure.  The sealant looks pretty good along the seam, but they put some scratches in the plastic panels beside the rear seat.  The dealership also completed the 4 recalls at the same time as the leak, and now my seat belt holders in the pillars rattle.  Highest in initial quality awards...give me a break!!    

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...