Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, ArTurf said:

Say what, does that apply to all trucks or just the 3.0

All of them. It's included as part of the warranty coverage (dealer submits warranty claim to gm to cover the oil change)

 

They were providing more than that for a while.

Some dealers provide oil changes beyond what GM covers. 

 

The hope is that you will get used to using them and continue the practice after the included ones have been used. 

 

From Chev website:

 Chevrolet includes scheduled maintenance visits with the purchase or lease of new 2018-2020 Chevrolet models.
2019-2020 models receive the first maintenance visit within the first 1-year/12,000-miles (whichever comes first)†
2018 models receive two maintenance visits within 2 years/24,000 miles (whichever comes first)†

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just revisiting this subject...

 

I had a 19 with the 6.2L.   Mostly do a lot of towing my toys.   The 6.2L never did better than 10 MPG towing my enclosed trailer (2000lbs/but 7ft tall).

 

Literally just got the 20 with a 3L Diesel to try and save on fuel.  Remember, the 6.2L required premium fuel which is about .50 cents more than diesel in my area.

 

The gas engines move.  But for towing, man do you pay at the pump.

 

So, it depends on what its used for I guess ....

Posted
On 3/30/2020 at 2:06 PM, steve841 said:

Just revisiting this subject...

 

I had a 19 with the 6.2L.   Mostly do a lot of towing my toys.   The 6.2L never did better than 10 MPG towing my enclosed trailer (2000lbs/but 7ft tall).

 

Literally just got the 20 with a 3L Diesel to try and save on fuel.  Remember, the 6.2L required premium fuel which is about .50 cents more than diesel in my area.

 

The gas engines move.  But for towing, man do you pay at the pump.

 

So, it depends on what its used for I guess ....

How does your overall MPG compare?

Posted
3 minutes ago, AJS2294 said:

How does your overall MPG compare?

Gonna be a bit before I can answer that ...  on lockdown.  I've had it since Saturday and I have yet to reach 50 miles. ?

  • Haha 1
Posted

I've had several 5.3s. A great engine. I now have a 3.0. Best engine yet. 30MPG. The 460lbs of torque make it feel like youi're driving a big block Chevelle. Only extra expense I see is changing the fuel filter every 30,000 miles. After driving the 3.0 if I had a 5.3 I would be trading soon.  

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Just over a 100 miles and averaging about 25mpg with the Duramax.

 

Bottom line, if you're wanting to holeshot the lights, race up the ramps ... but all means get a gas engine.

 

If those days have passed, the Duramax is the only way to go.

 

That's 40%+++ more MPGs than my 6.2L.  You cant make that difference up in fuel savings...  ever!

Edited by steve841
Posted
2 hours ago, steve841 said:

Just over a 100 miles and averaging about 25mpg with the Duramax.

 

Bottom line, if you're wanting to holeshot the lights, race up the ramps ... but all means get a gas engine.

 

If those days have passed, the Duramax is the only way to go.

 

That's 40%+++ more MPGs than my 6.2L.  You cant make that difference up in fuel savings...  ever!

Are you saying the increase in MPG outweighs the extra cost of diesel? I have the 6.2 but part of me wishes I had the 3.0 D

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ArTurf said:

Are you saying the increase in MPG outweighs the extra cost of diesel? I have the 6.2 but part of me wishes I had the 3.0 D

Exactly what I’m saying as related to the 6.2 running premium. The 5.3 not so much.  Hard to make up for a $3k less option.

 

Premium in the area is about $3.10 vs diesel at around $2.60.

My brother got an AT4 at the same time. I told him go diesel.  The color he wanted had a 6.2. He caved.
 

2 weeks later, he’s regretting not listening to me. I’ve had 2  6.2s.  Never again. And only because of mileage.

 

 

Edited by steve841
  • 2 months later...
Posted

I have had several 5.3's over the years.  I just picked up the GMC Sierra version of the Baby Duramax AND love it.  I first started looking at diesels about 5 years ago when I was making regular trips between Scranton PA and Central AL.  The 2500HD's are great trucks but I could not justify it, my occasional towing consists of 2 Harleys on a flat bed trailer about 4000lbs.  The 5.3 is more than capable of pulling the load at highway speeds.  I test drove one and was surprised how much more responsive the truck was.  I have put about 1100 miles on the truck and am averaging 21-22 mpg for my daily commute.  Drove to Denver today to see the grand baby and round trip on the highway was just over 32 mpg, by the DIC.  So far loving the TQ and the MPG.   

  • Like 1
Posted

I have 550 miles on my new 3l denali .averaged 33 mpg on way home from dealer 2 hr ride 68 mph impressive  

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I came over to the 3.0 from the 5.7 hemi.  I loved the ram truck, the ride, the interior, it was a great truck.  I could not find any sort of deal at all on the the ram ecodiesel (generation 3 motor) or I probably would have picked that up just because I love the ram interior and ride.  The 5.7 hemi pulling my rv and snowmobiles every weekend was always redlined over any sort of hill.  I cant even imagine the 5.3 RPMs.  I ended up buying a 06 LBZ just to handle the RV but frankly after riding around in the new 1/2 tons the ride quality on the 06 was crap and I sold it within a year.

Enter the 3.0 and I have to say this thing paired with the 10 speed is a freaking dream drive.  Its quiet, smooth, torquey, and surprisingly quick.  It handles my RV just fine at 1900 rpms cruising on the freeway and no redline everytime I try and go up an incline.  Have not had it in the winter but Im expecting 18+mpg towing 2 sleds couple days a week.

The only real extra expense besides the intitial $2500 will be fuel filters and a couple of dollars for def.  It takes the same quarts on oil as the 5.3 I believe.  Ill make all of that up at the pump easily because it gets about double the MPG towing than my hemi did and probably what the 5.3 would get too.  

All that said, even if I dont tow like I do, Id still probably drive the 3.0.  Its just so damn nice to drive, only wish it had a comparable interior to the new rams.  

  • Like 2
Posted
I came over to the 3.0 from the 5.7 hemi.  I loved the ram truck, the ride, the interior, it was a great truck.  I could not find any sort of deal at all on the the ram ecodiesel (generation 3 motor) or I probably would have picked that up just because I love the ram interior and ride.  The 5.7 hemi pulling my rv and snowmobiles every weekend was always redlined over any sort of hill.  I cant even imagine the 5.3 RPMs.  I ended up buying a 06 LBZ just to handle the RV but frankly after riding around in the new 1/2 tons the ride quality on the 06 was crap and I sold it within a year.

Enter the 3.0 and I have to say this thing paired with the 10 speed is a freaking dream drive.  Its quiet, smooth, torquey, and surprisingly quick.  It handles my RV just fine at 1900 rpms cruising on the freeway and no redline everytime I try and go up an incline.  Have not had it in the winter but Im expecting 18+mpg towing 2 sleds couple days a week.

The only real extra expense besides the intitial $2500 will be fuel filters and a couple of dollars for def.  It takes the same quarts on oil as the 5.3 I believe.  Ill make all of that up at the pump easily because it gets about double the MPG towing than my hemi did and probably what the 5.3 would get too.  

All that said, even if I dont tow like I do, Id still probably drive the 3.0.  Its just so damn nice to drive, only wish it had a comparable interior to the new rams.  
Less oil 3.0 is 7 and 5.3 is 8. I cant wait to see how it does pulling sleds, that sport is expensive as it is, anything helps.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/30/2018 at 11:22 AM, MikeNH said:

Outside of HD trucks, diesels are not fast. It'll be slow but pull like a freight train. The engine will likely add $3000-$4000 to the sticker and as was already said, diesel tends to be more expensive. I'm not sold on diesels in the light duty trucks. It's a tough spot. I want to get back into a pickup myself this spring and I'm a Chevy fan but as much as I like the concept of the Trail Boss, GM has left a lot out of these trucks, including removing stuff 2018s had. Really makes me look toward Ford and Ram. 

Not sure what you mean the Trail Boss is lacking from the 2018 trucks? Are you looking at Custom TB, or LT TB, the LT TB includes tons more stuff than the Custom TB.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...