Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Discovered a problem yesterday hauling my dirt bike.  When you are using the MultiPro Tailgate "Step" as a cargo stop it doesn't work as it should.  With the "step" in the "up", cargo stop position as pictured below there is no mechanical stay/lock to keep the "step" in the raised position.  As soon as you hit the brakes the step folds down into the closed position rendering is useless as a cargo stop.  It will only stay up if you have cargo the exact dimensions to wedge up against it to keep it up.

 

After leaving my house the first stop sign I came to I heard a "thunk" and stopped to see what it was.  Low and behold, I found out it was the cargo stop falling into the closed position.  The design is comical at best.  In my case it's somewhat important.  One of the reasons I bought was the tailgate so I could load dirt bikes in straight as I'd now have a cargo stop.  Also wanted the stop to keep all our riding gear in the bed.  It's a pain in the ass loading dirt bikes at an angle so you can get containment by closing the tailgate.

 

I think I'll design/build a rod/support of some sort to just wedge in there to keep it in the raised position.

 

As an engineer myself I don't understand how the GM guys let this shit get into production with these issues.  I really wonder if they do any real world testing.  The fix wouldn't even cost them anything.  They could have just made it with a sliding hinge "lock/stay" to keep the hinge from closing and the cargo stop from falling down.  I might go this route instead of a "prop rod".  The GM guys come up with some really cool stuff but they don't always think it through.  In my company this is called incompetence.  A mediocre operability design review would have identified this issue if one had been done...

 

Image result for multipro tailgate cargo stop  Image result for multipro tailgate cargo stop

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Yes, and apparently when you drop the lower piece it will hit the trailer ball if installed. Gimmick junk in my option anyway.. glad I got the silverado. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, GMC-AT said:

Yes, and apparently when you drop the lower piece it will hit the trailer ball if installed. Gimmick junk in my option anyway.. glad I got the silverado. 

 

It's a personal preference but I disagree that it's a gimmick.  If you have one and use your truck like a truck it's a REALLY cool and useful feature.  You don't realise it until you've had the opportunity to use it in real life activities.  I think the overall design and operability is a fantastic improvement on the "old" traditional tailgate.

 

Also, if you think it's a gimmick and don't want it it's a no cost option to spec out the truck with a traditional gate.

 

Your comment is similar to the comments made back when they added electric start to vehicles instead of a hand crank.  Cranky old men would sit in their rockers on the porch and gripe wondering what they will do when this new fangled electric start thing leaves them stranded.  They'd say screw that, just sell me one with a hand crank and then yell at you to, "GET THE HELL OFF MY GRASS"!!!

 

Rick

 

P.S.  I've a number of friends who bought a GMC instead of a Chevy just to get the new tailgate and they don't regret it even after driving Chevy's their their entire life.

Edited by rikhek
  • Like 5
  • Haha 2
Posted

I think the main motive of the design was to create a step for easy access. After testing, they found that it could be marketed for other uses as well.... such as a load stop. I am not disagreeing with you that they could've easily added a lock but I do not think it is a gimmick at all. I think it was a great idea as far as a step is concerned. First year of production... they will get it right.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Aycock1987 said:

I think the main motive of the design was to create a step for easy access. After testing, they found that it could be marketed for other uses as well.... such as a load stop. I am not disagreeing with you that they could've easily added a lock but I do not think it is a gimmick at all. I think it was a great idea as far as a step is concerned. First year of production... they will get it right.

This. They wanted another step to get into the tailgate without looking like they outright copied Ford. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I hear you guys but it’s still unacceptable from a “professional” engineering perspective. ANY new design in any discipline should be subjected to a design and operability review. First year out with something mew even more so. It’s just the way any design standard/process should function. They dropped the ball, plain and simple. 

 

The GM legal department is going to look to get someone fired. Wait until the first lawsuit from someone behind a GM truck gets damaged/hurt from something falling out of the bed. The GMC owner will state it was marketed and sold as cargo containment, a faulty design was responsible for the damage, not the owner. It will happen...

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/15/2019 at 2:54 PM, rikhek said:

Wait until the first lawsuit from someone behind a GM truck gets damaged/hurt from something falling out of the bed.

 

This is part of the reason these trucks cost $65,000 ... defending such claims

 

BTW I agree it should have a lock for the retracted position.

Edited by Keta
  • Like 1
Posted

I'm surprised this is an issue. Seems like it should have a simple detent in place to hold it up.

Posted

My post from another thread:

 

Automotive prices continue to Rise, while Quality Declines.

The simple fact of the matter is that vehicles are not truly tested enough before being released into production.

Or, assembly lines are relying more on robots to perform repetitive tasks. Robots are not good at quality control however.

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 2/15/2019 at 10:28 AM, GMC-AT said:

Yes, and apparently when you drop the lower piece it will hit the trailer ball if installed. Gimmick junk in my option anyway.. glad I got the silverado. 

 

 

Posted

I just bought a new 2019 GMC sierra with the new tailgate GM needs To add a fix to the tailgate problem to stop the tailgate from hitting the ball hitch when lowering the gate all the way.   I live in the area where most men drive trucks

most of the men  that I showed the problem to

said they would not buy a truck with the new tailgate like this due to the fact most of them keep their hitch on their truck full-time .

Posted (edited)
On 2/15/2019 at 2:54 PM, rikhek said:

I hear you guys but it’s still unacceptable from a “professional” engineering perspective. ANY new design in any discipline should be subjected to a design and operability review. First year out with something mew even more so. It’s just the way any design standard/process should function. They dropped the ball, plain and simple. 

 

The GM legal department is going to look to get someone fired. Wait until the first lawsuit from someone behind a GM truck gets damaged/hurt from something falling out of the bed. The GMC owner will state it was marketed and sold as cargo containment, a faulty design was responsible for the damage, not the owner. It will happen...

Since when has a first year design come out "Bug Free".  I happen to like the tailgate and use it almost every time I load-up the bed.

With the height of the sides, it makes things a lot easier. The first time I used the step I looked for the hinge to lock. When I realized I couldn't lock it, I thought it was odd. I totally agree.

I stopped leaving the hitch ball in after banging my shins a few times and having the pin lock seize-up on me.

BTW, I have the convertible twin of your vette.

 

Edited by FDHog
Posted
I just bought a new 2019 GMC sierra with the new tailgate GM needs To add a fix to the tailgate problem to stop the tailgate from hitting the ball hitch when lowering the gate all the way.   I live in the area where most men drive trucks
most of the men  that I showed the problem to
said they would not buy a truck with the new tailgate like this due to the fact most of them keep their hitch on their truck full-time .



Not to be an instigator, but what your saying is they don’t want to buy a truck because the tailgate but in reality they’re just lazy by not removing their hitch then complaining that it’s GM’s fault.

I don’t pull a trailer enough to justify leaving my hitch in the receiver but I understand the trade off. To get the cool tailgate I’ve got to do my due diligence and remove my hitch. I’m ok with that.
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Another engineering fail, in my opinion, is that with the load stop up, the bed's about an inch too short to hold an 8' sheet of plywood (or any 8' lumber).  Come on man, couldn't gimme another inch?

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have found myself using the MPTG much more than I thought I would.  It's very handing for many task.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • tl; dr I've now reached the 6th floor of hell. I'm chronicling my journey for my morning readers.   Pulling the top of the intake apart was moderately easy but it involved a lot of parts, connections, and minutae. I was preparing for the new fuel lines to arrive ("nut and bolt kit" it's called). The fuel line connections are notched and held in place by the manifold and a metal plate with a T27 screw.   It's on the back of the intake, under the firewall, with little clearance, and two hard metal fuel lines in the way. I was using Franken-tools (weird combinations of 1/4 inch ratchet with/without an extension, with a bit holder for my T27) to get in there. One of my sockets and bits fell off and has yet to emerge on the floor. I lost a second setup and that's when I almost started throwing tools. But that was the point at which I had gotten traction on the Torx head, and it promptly stripped. No more traction.   I started humming "1-877-kars-4-kids" because I was about at that point. You know what? I'm $1500 into this thing and I can make it disappear just as quickly. This isn't fun anymore. I had spent a lot of time already "tidying" around the engine bay: Fixing all the "someone's been here before!" BS. The truck has been exclusively dealer- and shop- serviced and I'm reminded of why I never let other people work on my cars unless absolutely necessary.   Speaking of dealer service. This truck has a 1" stack of records going back to 1995. I put them all in an excel spreadsheet, date/mileage/description.   The CPI spider has been replaced 4 times in 85k miles. The EGR? Another 4. Multiple, multiple O2 sensors. One Cat. 4? Sets of plugs and wires, and I swear half the stack is diagnosis paperwork for "misfire, runs rough, extended crank, dies at stoplights".   GM was producing some proper crap back then. And it was still well within the era of brittle/crappy plastic. (Windows 95 was released the same month this truck was sold new, we HAD the technology!!)   There (was) a plastic shroud around the evaporator core and HVAC fan in the engine bay. I noticed a chunk of it missing so I poked at it some more and it literally shattered. Touched it some more and pieces were crumbling off. Had a good laugh. Clearly whatever plastic garbage they were using had broken down over 30 years and was literally turning to dust. That was a good half hour of using a shop vac to remove the rest of it.   Back to it.   I was going to give up for the evening but then decided I'm already level 10 pissed off at the stripped screw: G* D* it, give me my tools back -- and my JOY. We'll do this the hard way: The whole intake is coming off.   Blazer won Round II. After finally finding and accessing the 12 intake bolts and using a pry bar to unseat it from the heads, it popped loose in an explosion of gunk and grime raining down into open ports. Awesome.   6 times I reminded myself: Be careful of the temperature sender on the front of the intake.   YEAH, I forgot again and snapped it clean off in the removal. Add another $20 to the ever-growing list of new parts this thing is consuming.   The shame is, long before removing the intake, I had changed the oil in prep for Tuesday's momentous fuel line replacement that was going to be the magic fix and I'd have a running Blazer to tool around in this next weekend. The intake removal, including raining gunk, also gushed dirty coolant all over the valley. Of course it did. Welp, there goes another $35.   I now need an intake gasket set, bolt set, coolant temp sensor, another 5 quarts of oil, some RTV. Don't worry, I've already got 3 new jugs of Dexcool and a thermostat waiting. I'll fill it with clean water first to get it running, dump it, and then add the Dex later on in case... well, let's not go there. I'm only tearing this down once, next time the truck is going on Marketplace for FREE.   Oh, and I'm going to need vacuum hose for all the stupid connections placed at the rear of the engine which have since disintegrated. Come on, GM....tell me you don't do that anymore?   Oh, and the ears on the distributor where the cap screws down are both cracked. I mean, why not put a new distributor in it too. You get a distributor, YOU get a distributor, Everyone gets a new distributor!   This truck isn't out of the woods yet...I'm already questioning how much more time I'm willing to sink in.
    • NewDude, thank you for the suggestions!    I did follow up and the dealer indicates he has an open CX case and is working with DPAC (Dealer Parts Assistance Center).   Per the dealer, GM has had a quality spill and is not providing an update for when a replacement engine will be available.
    • That's interesting.   There was a factory wire-hole in the back, top of the rear cab, which had a wire for the third brakelight assembly running through it, as well as several holes (10 of them I believe) for all of the studs coming off of the 3rd brakelight assembly itself.   I sealed all of those holes with RTV/silicone as well.   I found it kind of odd, that none of those holes, were sealed with any kind of sealant by the factory - if there was any there, it wasn't very much.   That said, I've been out in heavy rain and have ran the truck through high-pressure car-washes a few times now and she has been 100% water-tight to this point.   I feel very confident in the repair, we'll see how it holds up.
    • I bought a used 2022 2500hd with 6.6L in February. In March took a 2200 mile trip towing our 6500 lb trailer. Changed the oil day before leaving and when we were arriving at our 1st destination, low oil light came on (roughly 1000 miles) it was 2 qts low. Now it towed like a dream, no issue there, and we did go through the mountains of TN, but still, 2 qts! Luckily I did purchase an extended warranty. Brought it to the dealership in April, oil change and consumption test. Brought it back last week, 1300 miles, no towing, and no oil showing on the dipstick. GM is reccomending a new engine (cheaper than them rebuilding), we'll see if the warranty company comes through. 
    • T3's and Ibuprofen. I do have a cryotherapy unit (ice machine) and a lift chair that will allow me to raise my legs above my heart.  There are topicals that I can use once the wound is fully healed.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...