Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

By share they mean looks wise other wise the Hood/doors/tailgate are Alumy. 

 

Posted

https://www.automobilemag.com/news/2020-chevrolet-silverado-hd-heavy-duty-price-photos-specs/

 

5th paragraph:

 

“While the half-ton full-size GM pickups adapted mixed-material construction for 2019 in order to cut weight, the HD Silverado sticks with all steel for its ladder frame and body.”

 

No aluminum. I also heard one of the engineers say it but can’t locate the video right now.

  • Like 1
Posted

I though that would be the case went I heard the body panels were all different except for the roof.

 

What is really funny is the new Ford Ranger is all steel.

Posted

Yeah, I think that’s because our “new” Ford Ranger has been sold elsewhere in similar form since 2011. That was well before Ford trucks went aluminum-crazy. There’s already a new new one slated for 2021.

 

I like the idea of the 2020 HD being all steel. Hopefully it helps keep the price reasonable...:rolleyes:

Posted

I have been looking at new Super Duty's, and the body panel fit is pretty bad on them.  Lot of uneven gaps, particularly the doors.  Also, lots of complaints about water and wind leaks on the Ford forums.    

Posted
On 3/4/2019 at 2:34 PM, avalonandl said:

Aluminum panels will allow more noise through also.

Very true. Buddies 2017 F150 roof sounds thin to me , like when it rains the noise seems louder on the roof area then steel body roof 

Posted

I've found my 2017 F250 Platinum to be as quiet, if not more, than the 2015 Silverado 2500HD LTZ it replaced. Maybe the upper trims have more/better sound insulation, but it's definitely not louder under any circumstances so far. My panels fit well and look fine from all angles, so I can't relate to those issues, either. 

Posted

Perhaps aluminum doors and hood would be a good addition if they really are steel...

 

I put the order guides linked in my order time post: 

 

Weights are up about 200lbs or more per configuration vs. K2 HD. 

 

Example:

 

K2 2500HD CCSB L96 - 6532lbs.

 

T1 2500HD CCSB gas w/17" wheels - 6880lbs.

 

T1 2500DH CCSB gas w/18 or 20" wheels - 6909lbs.

 

Mind you, that K2 weight is base as base can be. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The T1XX HD is also larger in every aspect compared to K2xx HD. 

 

Yes, interior space improved but the truck is now taller, longer and wider. 

 

I wonder if fuel economy will be less than K2xx, like how people reporting in the half ton T1xx are getting less mpg than their K2xx.

 

Glad GM didn’t downsize the fuel tank in the HD like they did in the LD.

Posted
10 minutes ago, 2009GMC said:

 

Glad GM didn’t downsize the fuel tank in the HD like they did in the LD.

 

All but 2 cab/engine combo.  Double cab standard box diesel now have a 29 gallon tank, and regular cab long box diesel have a 28 gallon tank.  All the rest are 36 gallons.  All gas are 36 gallons.

 

Why the loss in those two?  DEF relocation.  If they left the DEF tank behind the passenger tire, the tanks would still be 36 gallons.  However, by relocating the DEF filler to the gas door, the tank was relocated to in front of the fuel tank to accommodate such a move.  The two short wheelbase chassis reflect this movement.      

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Glad to see the DEF tank hidden. Especially after it grew to an even larger eye sore with the l5p. Running boards couldn’t even hide it like on the LML where it was mostly hidden with nerf bars. 

  • 5 years later...
Posted

I’m hearing more noise around the doors on my 2023 Sierra1500.And it’s not the weather striping, I’ve dusted them with chalk and they are sealing up good.Now I’m thinking it’s filtering up from the rocker panels and up the center door post.For the money of these trucks they should be getting quieter not louder!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Does anyone know if the GM 85628205 and 85628208 are interchangeable?   The 85628205 is an assembly of the seals mated to a thin metal shim and the 85628208 appear to be just the rubber seals without being an assembly. The reason I am asking is that I'm installing a PPE Thermal Bypass Valve and it doesn't come with seals.
    • Thanks @newdude, guess I'll keep looking.  Test driving so many trucks that have obvious things broken, I'm thinking "if they couldn't even be bothered to fix the power seat," what else is broken".   Just drove a 2021 where the power seat motor was grinding/binding and wouldn't do anything but make a terrible sound.   An owner that puts dents on the bumper, doesn't fix a seat motor, and had spotty service intervals (along with missing major services) doesn't give me the best of confidence.   Amazed at the number of people that will finance a $60k+ truck, run it into the ground, then trade with a loan balance (every single one had "loan/lien reported" on the CARFAX at the last year of registration).
    • Not true! I have been runing them since 2006 F250! suspension component that works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring points directly to the RoadActive Suspension (RAS) kit. Works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring.
    • Here's a starter kit:    CC Jensen, a Danish oil testing Concern gives us the following guidelines:   ISO 14/12/10 Very Clean Oil ISO 16/14/11 Clean Oil ISO 17/15/12 Lightly Contaminated ISO 19/17/14 New Oil ISO 22/20/17 Very Contaminated and not suitable for any service.   In addition CC Jensen gives a table showing how engine life is increased by cleaning up the oil. For example cleaning the oil from 19/17/14 to 13/11/8 will extend motor life by a factor of 6X.   But even cleaning it two “Life Extension Classes” will double motor life. So perhaps giving those classes would be useful:   21/19/16 20/18/15 19/17/14 18/16/13 17/15/12 16/14/11 15/13/10 14/12/9 13/11/8   *************************************   https://testoil.com/program-management/setting-iso-cleanliness-targets/   Third paragraph from the bottom will give a starting point.    Your next question should be, okay 10um at what Beta ratio and the answer is in the graph Beta 75.   Then the next question is what is your chosen filters profile? (Purolator PL series below) The red dot is Beta 75. This was the information I obtained from MANN a few years ago. So the best filters, Purolator One, AMSOIL EA, FRAM Ultra, Royal Purple, Bosch Premium should get a doubling engine life over filters like Purolator L, any service filter from any quick lube, WIX, NAPA, STP, Mobil 1, Purolator BOSS.    And as noted by CC Jensen a 2-5 micron @ Beta 200 bypass system has the capability of a six fold improvement. AMSOIL has such a system as does Donaldson.       Now having said all that testing is the touchstone. Test the oil NEW and test it with your chosen filter. Then test over milage. Do the work, get the result. But understand this in NOT absolute BECAUSE this is one factor in isolation.   Example:    A valve spring supplier can state that with cam X and a valve train of Y grams the valves will not float to 7K rpm. is that true if the builder choose a system 20 grams over limit? Common sense must be used and limits understood. 
    • This doesn't look like a GM truck. Not needed on a HD truck
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...