Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Truckasaurus said:

Gig-Em! (℅ '95).  Also, notice you have the  painted wheel trim.  Did you install yourself or did you order from the factory?   Do you have a good pic of them, i'm curious how they interact with the (non-painted) mud guards that will remain.

 

Class of 2016 here, they were on the truck when I bought it and it makes it look much better, my 2019 did not have the painted ones and I like the look of the painted ones more. Blends in well with the black. 

7093CAC5-F302-4BC5-9D68-950DFFC80543.jpeg

Posted
7 minutes ago, CarbonProGMC said:

Class of 2016 here, they were on the truck when I bought it and it makes it look much better, my 2019 did not have the painted ones and I like the look of the painted ones more. Blends in well with the black. 

7093CAC5-F302-4BC5-9D68-950DFFC80543.jpeg

Thanks for the photo!  I need these... I liked the plastic ones at first, but have discovered that the rough surface finish on them traps dirt and dust (particularly in the groove portion) and tends to make the whole truck look dirty when it's not.

Posted
On ‎12‎/‎26‎/‎2019 at 10:14 PM, Guy Thompson said:

Yes, I have been stalking this forum looking for this exact answer. I went ahead and ordered a Roll-n-Lock cover of which the manufacturer said that they were not interested in figuring out a way to mount their cover. Well it was easy, just a little drilling to make places to mount. My biggest concern was being able to drill into the carbon bed that GM claims is virtually indestructible. Well, its not, it drills like a plastic/fiberglass compound. Heres some pictures I took for you guys and gals.

IMG_0207D.jpegIMG_0208D.jpeg

 

IMG_0209D.jpegIMG_0198D.jpegIMG_0199D.jpegIMG_0200D.jpeg

 

IMG_0230.jpegIMG_0232D.jpeg

 

IMG_0233D.jpeg

IMG_0202D.jpeg

IMG_0203D.jpeg

Thanks for the info. I'm installing this same cover on my 2020 AT4. I was wondering if you have had any issues with or problems with the carbon bed due to drilling the holes? Cacks, breaking, etc.

Posted

Stoops automotive group figured tha hard cover out!!!! See youtube vid. 

Posted
Stoops automotive group figured tha hard cover out!!!! See youtube vid. 

You have a link?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Check out ACI - Agricover Inc.  (Access) https://www.accesscover.com/

I've been in contact with these folks for a few weeks and they released versions for the Carbon Pro yesterday.  I see their website was updated today to include Carbon Pro box.  I phone ordered one yesterday and it's shipping today!

Posted
Check out ACI - Agricover Inc.  (Access) https://www.accesscover.com/
I've been in contact with these folks for a few weeks and they released versions for the Carbon Pro yesterday.  I see their website was updated today to include Carbon Pro box.  I phone ordered one yesterday and it's shipping today!

Which one did you order? If you’ve gotten it can you tell us how you like it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Here are photo's from install last evening.  ACI did a nice job on the install kit. (P/N 12459 is what is listed on the invoice.)IMG_2862.jpg.20cf5e90efa771940e9fc53387151ab0.jpg
IMG_2859.jpg.ddbc8de309082c34b65174f2f5a8cd29.jpgIMG_2860.jpg.50d2c8fbd706b2b13f28382ba131e052.jpg
 
 
IMG_2858.jpg.22ba2d847f8a4423e78a82ba6e4b2594.jpg

Looks great! Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Here are photo's from install last evening.  ACI did a nice job on the install kit. (P/N 12459 is what is listed on the invoice.)IMG_2862.jpg.20cf5e90efa771940e9fc53387151ab0.jpg
IMG_2859.jpg.ddbc8de309082c34b65174f2f5a8cd29.jpgIMG_2860.jpg.50d2c8fbd706b2b13f28382ba131e052.jpg
 
 
IMG_2858.jpg.22ba2d847f8a4423e78a82ba6e4b2594.jpg

Would you mind taking an up close picture of the clamps and how exactly they work? Looking at my truck I just don’t see how it’s possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 hours ago, CP312 said:


Would you mind taking an up close picture of the clamps and how exactly they work? Looking at my truck I just don’t see how it’s possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pull back the plastic trim cap and you will find a series of molded in holes.  Their kit comes with u-nuts to put in those spots and a 1/4” drill jig to locate the mounting holes you need to drill through the plastic cap.  (You don’t drill into the box).  The bolts pass through the new holes in the plastic box rail cap and thread into the u-nuts that snap into the factory spots in the box.  The box was designed for the kit-included mounting nuts.  If you have a Carbon Pro, they are there, just peek under the trim cap.  

83F82A60-6661-4611-A062-993703741500.jpeg

Posted
9 minutes ago, hackskier said:

Pull back the plastic trim cap and you will find a series of molded in holes.  Their kit comes with u-nuts to put in those spots and a 1/4” drill jig to locate the mounting holes you need to drill through the plastic cap.  (You don’t drill into the box).  The bolts pass through the new holes in the plastic box rail cap and thread into the u-nuts that snap into the factory spots in the box.  The box was designed for the kit-included mounting nuts.  If you have a Carbon Pro, they are there, just peek under the trim cap.  

83F82A60-6661-4611-A062-993703741500.jpeg

Cool, so it’s the same mechanism as the GM “Factory” cover.   I wonder if GM is supplying these parts/specs to aftermarket accessories makers (they should).  

Posted
Pull back the plastic trim cap and you will find a series of molded in holes.  Their kit comes with u-nuts to put in those spots and a 1/4” drill jig to locate the mounting holes you need to drill through the plastic cap.  (You don’t drill into the box).  The bolts pass through the new holes in the plastic box rail cap and thread into the u-nuts that snap into the factory spots in the box.  The box was designed for the kit-included mounting nuts.  If you have a Carbon Pro, they are there, just peek under the trim cap.  
83F82A60-6661-4611-A062-993703741500.jpeg.1e2bb59e6cf49c3f303410ecd7d7e72b.jpeg

Got it, thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...