Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey folks,

 

Just wondering what the biggest tire is I can fit on the factory 20s without rubbing or any issues.

 

I plan on changing the shocks to 5100s when they become available and will raise the front a little also. Will that help with clearance much? I just want more sidewall for a better ride and a tougher tire.

 

Currently have the 275/60R20 tire size. Thanks.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

741994584f0f80189e049a10a2e45923.jpg
285/65/20 with only 2 inch level from ready lift

About a 34.5 inch tall tire and 11.5 inches wide
Very light rub on plastic mud flap when reverse at full lock, not enough for me to trim.

  • Like 4
Posted

I put KO2’s 275r60 20’s on mine the first day. I know that is the stock size but look more aggressive and in my opinion the 33” tire looks good. 

 

I looked at the 275r65 which is 1” taller and .54 more sidewall but Discount Tire steered me away from them.

 

Mine have a D rating which is plenty for a 1/2 ton truck.

Posted
I put KO2’s 275r60 20’s on mine the first day. I know that is the stock size but look more aggressive and in my opinion the 33” tire looks good. 
 
I looked at the 275r65 which is 1” taller and .54 more sidewall but Discount Tire steered me away from them.
 
Mine have a D rating which is plenty for a 1/2 ton truck.


Mind if I ask why they steered you away from them?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
741994584f0f80189e049a10a2e45923.jpg
285/65/20 with only 2 inch level from ready lift

About a 34.5 inch tall tire and 11.5 inches wide
Very light rub on plastic mud flap when reverse at full lock, not enough for me to trim.


Good looking truck...are those KO2s? 285/65 is what I was after so that’s good news. Torn between the KO2 and Nitto Terra grapplers G2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

They were afraid they would rub and would not offer their 30 return policy. I like the bigger tire but at 67 years old every 1” gets tougher!

Posted


Good looking truck...are those KO2s? 285/65 is what I was after so that’s good news. Torn between the KO2 and Nitto Terra grapplers G2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
its changed from then now lol

Yes KO2, I would do KO2
That particular nitro isn’t the best in wet conditions. I’ve had them all
My go to tires are KO2 or Toyo RT
Posted
On 8/14/2019 at 11:30 AM, JimTX said:

 

Hey folks,

 

Just wondering what the biggest tire is I can fit on the factory 20s without rubbing or any issues.

 

I plan on changing the shocks to 5100s when they become available and will raise the front a little also. Will that help with clearance much? I just want more sidewall for a better ride and a tougher tire.

 

Currently have the 275/60R20 tire size. Thanks.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

So do your 275/60r20s rub currently without any modifications?  That is the size I am trying to put on mine.  I do not want to lift or level currently.  I am under the impression that is the biggest size I could go without rub.

Posted
1 hour ago, Bluerado23 said:

These come stock with 275/60/20 ....
So there is no rubbing with the tires that these trucks come with from the factory

Gotcha.  Wasn't sure if that would be the same for a 2014 Sierra 1500 4x2.  Had 275/55r20 when I bought it.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Enthusiast,

 

Truck looks nice with the KO2's.  I just bought a RST and will be installing the 2 inch level kit from ReadyLift this weekend.  Tires are next but like many others was not sure exactly which ones I want to purchase.  Is there any way you can post a few more photos of your truck that has the 285/65r20 KO2's, including a side view?  I was thinking about purchasing the 285/60r20 tires but from the one photo you posted I might go with the 285/65r20's.

 

Thanks in advance?

Don

  • 4 months later...
Posted

That truck looks good with that tire set up ??. 285 65 20. I got a 19RST with a 2 inch southern truck level kit and went to discount today. They are getting some 285 60 20(33.46 inch tires) Nitto Ridge Grapplers in on Monday which I am going to test fit to see if I like it. I’m not wanting any rubbing. I’ll post pics if I end up getting them. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jay Teez said:

That truck looks good with that tire set up ??. 285 65 20. I got a 19RST with a 2 inch southern truck level kit and went to discount today. They are getting some 285 60 20(33.46 inch tires) Nitto Ridge Grapplers in on Monday which I am going to test fit to see if I like it. I’m not wanting any rubbing. I’ll post pics if I end up getting them. 

You should be fine. 

  • Like 1
Posted

2019 RST Z71 2 inch Southern Truck Level 

Stock 20 inch Wheels

285 60 20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

No Rub!!! ?

4A58DBED-376F-488C-A42A-7086CA0EB21D.jpeg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...