Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/9/2019 at 7:48 AM, Cpl_Punishment said:

Isn't that why the "fast idle stick" was invented? ?

 

 

The ‘Bertan in me loved every minute of that

 

  • Like 1
Posted

3.0L Duramax - who owns or has driven one

 

 

 

 

3.0L Duramax - who owns or has driven one

  • Like 1
Posted

Chad Ivan just did a 103mile loop at 70mph showing him topping off before and after the loop at the exact same gas pump to check MPG, the truck also did a regen right at the beginning of the trip.

 

He has a crew cab short bed max tow 4x4.

 

DIC said 29mpg, hand calc was 30.  Video is worth a watch.  

Posted

Chad makes great video's about his new 3.0 truck!

 

What does the 3.0 "max tow" equipment include?

Posted
4 hours ago, Rubyralph said:

Chad makes great video's about his new 3.0 truck!

 

What does the 3.0 "max tow" equipment include?

 

That's a good question... I haven't tried it recently but I recall that the Max Tow package isn't even available on the 3.0 Duramax.  I think the only thing you can do is get the Trailering Equipment packages and Tow Mirrors are an independent option which you can select.  The 3.0 Duramax must not require the enhanced cooling/gearing which is offered on the Gas trucks for Max Tow package.

Posted
42 minutes ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

 

That's a good question... I haven't tried it recently but I recall that the Max Tow package isn't even available on the 3.0 Duramax.  I think the only thing you can do is get the Trailering Equipment packages and Tow Mirrors are an independent option which you can select.  The 3.0 Duramax must not require the enhanced cooling/gearing which is offered on the Gas trucks for Max Tow package. 

"Very interesting" ?

  • Like 1
Posted

So, there was a lot of posts on there, one post said the timing belt only lasts 150,000 miles and that the engine is done at 150,000 miles.

 

Is there any truth to either one of these?

Posted
45 minutes ago, jaslon said:

So, there was a lot of posts on there, one post said the timing belt only lasts 150,000 miles and that the engine is done at 150,000 miles.

 

Is there any truth to either one of these?

Yes, it is said that the belt, which I think runs the oil sump, will most likely require service at or around 150,000 miles.  The transmission has to be dropped to get to it I guess.  Guessing it would be more than few hundred to get that fixed haha... for someone like me who drives 10-15k miles per year... it isn't something that makes me want to say a hard No to this engine.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

Yes, it is said that the belt, which I think runs the oil sump, will most likely require service at or around 150,000 miles.  The transmission has to be dropped to get to it I guess.  Guessing it would be more than few hundred to get that fixed haha... for someone like me who drives 10-15k miles per year... it isn't something that makes me want to say a hard No to this engine.

Yeah, right now I am averaging 20k miles a year. My Pilot averages 25 mpg. If I can get a truck that gets 30 plus mpg, that almost sounds like a winner, but maybe the servicing a diesel engine is a lot more expensive.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, jaslon said:

Yeah, right now I am averaging 20k miles a year. My Pilot averages 25 mpg. If I can get a truck that gets 30 plus mpg, that almost sounds like a winner, but maybe the servicing a diesel engine is a lot more expensive.

 

Me either, but if I was using this new engine to tow across country or use as a high mileage work truck, it would be a service cost consideration.

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

Yes, it is said that the belt, which I think runs the oil sump, will most likely require service at or around 150,000 miles.  The transmission has to be dropped to get to it I guess.  Guessing it would be more than few hundred to get that fixed haha... for someone like me who drives 10-15k miles per year... it isn't something that makes me want to say a hard No to this engine. 

Not sure why GM engineered a diesel engine oil pump drive belt to last only 150K miles?

The Engineer's were up front speaking about the design of this new Duramax engine, but when I heard about the limit on the oil pump drive belt it was a big "red flag" for me.

I think the 3.0 Duramax engine with the 10 speed transmission sounds almost too good to be true.

 

We will see, only time and miles will prove its reliability, that said I can't wait to test drive one!

   

Edited by Rubyralph
grammer
Posted
8 hours ago, jaslon said:

Yeah, right now I am averaging 20k miles a year. My Pilot averages 25 mpg. If I can get a truck that gets 30 plus mpg, that almost sounds like a winner, but maybe the servicing a diesel engine is a lot more expensive.

 

First thing is come to the realization you will not get 30mpg plus with this truck unless you are driving 55mph everywhere.  I bet you could have a good chance of at least matching your Pilots mpg.

 Im not exactly sold on diesels being a lot more expensive to maintain,  however,  when something breaks,  count on it being more expensive!

 

 

6 hours ago, Rubyralph said:

Not sure why GM engineered a diesel engine oil pump drive belt to last only 150K miles?

The Engineer's were up front speaking about the design of this new Duramax engine, but when I heard about the limit on the oil pump drive belt it was a big "red flag" for me.

I think the 3.0 Duramax engine with the 10 speed transmission sounds almost too good to be true.

 

We will see, only time and miles will prove its reliability, that said I can't wait to test drive one!

   

I'm not sure either but like you said lets see what happens as they are around longer.  

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Rubyralph said:

Chad makes great video's about his new 3.0 truck!

 

What does the 3.0 "max tow" equipment include?

 

11 hours ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

 

That's a good question... I haven't tried it recently but I recall that the Max Tow package isn't even available on the 3.0 Duramax.  I think the only thing you can do is get the Trailering Equipment packages and Tow Mirrors are an independent option which you can select.  The 3.0 Duramax must not require the enhanced cooling/gearing which is offered on the Gas trucks for Max Tow package.

Order guide still shows no max tow for the 3.0L

 

NHT         Max Trailering Package, includes 9.76" rear axle, (GU6) 3.42 axle ratio, enhanced cooling radiator, revised shock tuning for increased control, heavier duty rear springs, increased RGAWR and (KW5) 220-amp alternator
On SLE and Elevation - Requires (L84) 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 engine, (Z82) Trailering Package, (G80) locking differential and 18" or 20" wheels and tires. Includes (JL1) trailer brake controller. Not available with 22" LPO wheels or (X31) X31 Off-Road Package.
On SLT  - Requires (L84) 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 engine or (L87) 6.2L EcoTec3 V8 engine and 18" or 20" wheels and tires. Not available with 22" LPO wheels, or (X31) X31 Off-Road Package. 

 

NHT not available on other trims

 

But as mentioned, tow mirrors are now available without the NHT package.

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

First thing is come to the realization you will not get 30mpg plus with this truck unless you are driving 55mph everywhere.  I bet you could have a good chance of at least matching your Pilots mpg.

 Im not exactly sold on diesels being a lot more expensive to maintain,  however,  when something breaks,  count on it being more expensive!

 

 

I'm not sure either but like you said lets see what happens as they are around longer.  

If you are saying that the diesel engine will not get better than 25 mpg, what is point of getting one, if one is using this for mainly mileage, you are better off buying a gas engine.

Posted
8 minutes ago, jaslon said:

If you are saying that the diesel engine will not get better than 25 mpg, what is point of getting one, if one is using this for mainly mileage, you are better off buying a gas engine.

I was just trying to make a point that I wouldn't say the truck will get 30+ consistently, and don't trick yourself into buying one if you think you will get 30+ unless you purely drive ideal conditions.  I believe that upper 20s are certainly realistic. An owner on YouTube has proven this with his experience so far.  Not trying to downplay the mpg numbers.  Heck I hope more and more owners experience and can share their great MPG numbers with real world driving!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...