Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did a short interstate run today, amazing what a little tail wind can do. Normally have gotten 23-24 at 80 mph which I still think is pretty good for a pickup at that speed493a3cc189c4811f2e9afe080fb3abd6.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted
On 9/29/2019 at 9:14 PM, becker87 said:

Did a short interstate run today, amazing what a little tail wind can do. Normally have gotten 23-24 at 80 mph which I still think is pretty good for a pickup at that speed493a3cc189c4811f2e9afe080fb3abd6.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 

Hmm so you see low to almost mid 20s at 80mph?

Posted
39 minutes ago, SkiDooNick700 said:

Hmm so you see low to almost mid 20s at 80mph?

The few 40 mile sprints I have done in the week i have had it, yes seeing 23-24 mpg

Posted

I was probably expecting too much but was hoping to see 27-30mpg highway doing 70-75mph.  If you're getting 23-24 in a Silverado, I wonder if the Sierra gets even less then that, since it is rated less from the EPA to begin with.

 

Will have to see what others get as more people buy them and get miles on em.

Posted
I was probably expecting too much but was hoping to see 27-30mpg highway doing 70-75mph.  If you're getting 23-24 in a Silverado, I wonder if the Sierra gets even less then that, since it is rated less from the EPA to begin with.
 
Will have to see what others get as more people buy them and get miles on em.
At 70 the mpg get to around 26-27 but on interstate I don't drive 70, mainly do that on back highway roads. When is the last time you've seen a vehicle reach the EPA estimate at 80 mph anyway?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted
6 hours ago, becker87 said:

At 70 the mpg get to around 26-27 but on interstate I don't drive 70, mainly do that on back highway roads. When is the last time you've seen a vehicle reach the EPA estimate at 80 mph anyway?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 

Totally do agree with you... whats the window sticker say on your truck? I think you have CC std bed 4wd? 

Posted
Totally do agree with you... whats the window sticker say on your truck? I think you have CC std bed 4wd? 
Yes, 23/29

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted
6 minutes ago, becker87 said:

Yes, 23/29

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 

I guess I wasnt expecting the mpg to be as high as 5mpg off highway number.  My truck never got 21mpg per the sticker highway but consistently gets 19mpg even running 75 to 80. 

 

I know we're  comparing apples to oranges with our trucks.  Like you mentioned 80mph is a different ball game than 70mph.  

 

Ill be curious to see other peoples experience as we see more owners. 

 

Either way,  Im still jealous i don't have one lol ?

Posted

I thought I read that Car and Driver got 40 mpg highway with this engine. Not sure what speed that was at, though. That combined with the fact that it towed an 8000 lb, 24 ft box trailer up a grade like a champ would be enough to make me want one if my commute was longer than 5 miles. 

Posted
I thought I read that Car and Driver got 40 mpg highway with this engine. Not sure what speed that was at, though. That combined with the fact that it towed an 8000 lb, 24 ft box trailer up a grade like a champ would be enough to make me want one if my commute was longer than 5 miles. 
I read a few articles like that as well and I believe they where hyper-miling them, I believe that's what you call it. Ya know, mirrors in, drafting, low speed, things like that.

Hoping with a little more break in things only get better. I'm still averaging about 27-28 driving from job site to job site in town and that's the main reason I got it as some days I put on 70-80 miles just in town and saving that much in fuel costs is big to me

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Did you guys see that TFL did a 70mph highway run with an EcoDiesel tradesman?  Hand calced to 40mpg!  DIC said 32 or 33 I think.  It's hard to say it actually got 40mpg, even they are skeptical and plan to run the truck again.  These guys are pretty good at these kind of things tho, they try to remove as many variables as possible and keeps things as constant as possible for each vehicle they test.

 

Hoping the EPA comes out with their numbers for the EcoDiesel soon!

Posted
On 10/1/2019 at 11:04 AM, becker87 said:

At 70 the mpg get to around 26-27 but on interstate I don't drive 70, mainly do that on back highway roads. When is the last time you've seen a vehicle reach the EPA estimate at 80 mph anyway?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 


my 2018 Camry has an EPA rating of 38. I typically get 40 MPGs. Will always get 38 and have even pulled in 42 once. 

Posted

my 2018 Camry has an EPA rating of 38. I typically get 40 MPGs. Will always get 38 and have even pulled in 42 once. 
I guess I should have said what "truck" then

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

Anyone have anymore updates on this?  I think iI am picking one up Monday.  Trading out 2019 LT Z71 with the 5.3.  I drive approx 35k-40k miles a year and the fuel mileage difference is selling me on it.  Has anyone towed much with it yet?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I am experiecing the same issue, I have gone in the setting and disabled rain sensing function but I am still experiencing this. Whe i use my turn signal they will redomly turn on. Sometime they stay on and others times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop. Its super anoying, escpecially after a fresh wash. Anyone have any advice? . rain-sensing function, but I am still experiencing this issue Sometimes they stay on, and other times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop.It's super annoying, especially after a fresh wash.When I use my turn signal, they will randomly turn on. I am experiencing the same issue. I have gone into the settings and disabled the rain sensing function, but I am still experiencing this.
    • If we actually used any significant amount of that source in the USA then I'd agree but we don't. We've had that discussion before. We drill and pump more than we use. Thing is, we sell. We export. Gas and Crude. It's more profitable so any shortage here is self inflicted and LEGAL.    I worked a gas plant that has multiple fuel sources available and I worked in the furnace and boiler plant in that facility. I'd had days we swapped fuel types four times in a twelve hour shift which isn't done on supply but on margin. Two of the fuel sources are internally generated. Tail gas and DAK, both of which are sold as well a consumed. We always had more than we needed to run the process but we chose the fuel that produced the best margin not bought at the cheapest price always. A good bit of math to that and back in the time that was done on a slide rule.     I worked the Shale Oil Semiworks of Chevron Research and CONOCO Research in Salt Lake City. That process never went into production although it was very successful. Why? Did we lack oil bearing shale? Nope. Price of crude never made the margins work. That was in the late 70's early 80's. Remember history? What was happening then was a reaction to that situation. It didn't drive it. If so then it's easy. This isn't a supply and demand thing. This is a profit and margin thing and AI rules that now.    In no refining situation that I was ever in would a bomb hitting a well anywhere in the world 'instantly' interrupt or even distress the supply. Most plants have more than a months worth of crude in the tank field and more in pumping stations. That yo-yo could play out over days, weeks and maybe months and have zero impact on plant operations. How many times has this been off and on in the last few months? These people and not stupid. These plants measure down time in hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. They are not sucking fumes or waiting on the next truckload with baited breath. Besides, as I noted, they are for the most part 'vertically integrated'. They own it from the dirt is sits in to the delivery rack and sometimes to the pump. It has a HUGE shock absorber built in. When production suffers, refining wins and when refining is winning exploration is killing. The rest of that crap in the news is a 'news cycle'. Government dipping in to reserves? Oil is stealing their milk money. There's a reason Chevron abandon Venezuela infrastructure and it had nothing to do with security of US citizens. Nationals run those plants. it has to do with MARGINS disappearing to corruption. They are in no hurry to return. Is there supply there? Oh yea. More than enough to offset what is bought in the middle east. Just isn't ???? Profitable.    We have supply. There are places in Illinois you can drive a pipe into the ground and run your homes natural gas furnace on it.    A refinery fire will gum up the supply works but not a localized war where the market is using a limited supply from. Now Europe, that's something other....
    • $4.00 a gallon here now.   Diesel nearly $5.00 again.
    • If we're talking futures, yes, it's speculation.   The spot price of a delivered barrel is elevated now compared to before the conflict. And that is related more to current supply/demand.
    • SPECULATION on the wars effect raised prices. AI is maximizing the profit. Refining is vertically integrated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...