Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Likarok said:

We have seen it exactly the opposite of that in Alberta. I don't think I have seen friends helping friends and neighbors like we are right now. Maybe from being locked up but I have spoken to neighbors that I have not spoken to in years. And the store people seem so grateful that you have come in to buy something and help them get through. 

Are they blaming your highest elected official in your country for this outbreak?

Posted

It's hilarious that they blame the US president for this.

The virus got out from accidental exposure from a lab in China.

China starts buying up all the medical supplies, while telling the world it was from a wet market and that they're containing it.

Trump wants to close the US from international travel. "You can't, thass rayciss, etc."

Then it's Trump's fault when there aren't enough supplies?

[emoji23]

It's China's fault and they deserve to be punished brutally for this.

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, HeySkippyDog said:

It's hilarious that they blame the US president for this.

The virus got out from accidental exposure from a lab in China.

China starts buying up all the medical supplies, while telling the world it was from a wet market and that they're containing it.

Trump wants to close the US from international travel. "You can't, thass rayciss, etc."

Then it's Trump's fault when there aren't enough supplies?

emoji23.png

It's China's fault and they deserve to be punished brutally for this.

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk
 

A handful of countries have stated they are going to hold China accountable, everybody knows what went wrong here. China and the WHO are dirty. Only in the US could it be possible that our own media and politicians are blaming the president. This was predictable from the start.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/16/2020 at 7:22 PM, graystonelbz said:

Gmtruck.com communist regime.

Thinking you might have come up with the name for the Chinese market's website.....

 

Remember, this is just a free forum, only 3 things that are guaranteed on here are, we all have Aholes, trucks, and opinions. 

 

Hoping for your sake, you are having some fun with your remarks, because none of us are in a position to change the outcome of what is happening. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, graystonelbz said:

Are they blaming your highest elected official in your country for this outbreak?

The morons here find a way to blame Trudeau for everything. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

The morons here find a way to blame Trudeau for everything. 

Mostly just because he has a funny title, "Prime Minister", sounds like a steak, or a drink at Outback.

  • Haha 1
Posted
It's hilarious that they blame the US president for this.

 

The virus got out from accidental exposure from a lab in China.

 

China starts buying up all the medical supplies, while telling the world it was from a wet market and that they're containing it.

 

Trump wants to close the US from international travel. "You can't, thass rayciss, etc."

 

Then it's Trump's fault when there aren't enough supplies?

 

[emoji23]

 

It's China's fault and they deserve to be punished brutally for this.

 

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk

 

 

Just because it came from China doesn’t excuse the fact that the US federal administration didn’t do anything in the month of February to proactively stop the spread of the virus. They waited until it got bad to do anything. Look at all the articles that said they knew about it in November and dismissed it. Well look where we’re at today and tell me if they had handled it differently, that we would be in the same position.

 

Was the pandemic trumps fault? Absolutely not. Did he mismanage the handling of the pandemic? Yup. Same as other countries. We had a chance to start in February but we didn’t start until March. That’s a whole month gone to waste, that could have lead to a quicker “reopening” of the US

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
Just because it came from China doesn’t excuse the fact that the US federal administration didn’t do anything in the month of February to proactively stop the spread of the virus. They waited until it got bad to do anything. Look at all the articles that said they knew about it in November and dismissed it. Well look where we’re at today and tell me if they had handled it differently, that we would be in the same position.
 
Was the pandemic trumps fault? Absolutely not. Did he mismanage the handling of the pandemic? Yup. Same as other countries. We had a chance to start in February but we didn’t start until March. That’s a whole month gone to waste, that could have lead to a quicker “reopening” of the US
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you think he should have done?

He wanted to shut the borders down back then. But nooooooo. Can't do that. It's racist.

If we want to talk mismanagement, let's look at Congress resisting. Not the president.

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
What do you think he should have done?

He wanted to shut the borders down back then. But nooooooo. Can't do that. It's racist.

If we want to talk mismanagement, let's look at Congress resisting. Not the president.

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk


You’re 100% correct, it wasn’t just the White House that mismanaged, the government as a whole mismanaged. Both parties, not just one.

As for what we should have done, access to testing way earlier, and contact tracing from those who tested positive. Socially distance and prevent large gatherings long before the CDC “recommended it”. Hell, we still don’t even have the amount of testing we need. First week of March the White House promised millions of tests available, they’re still not available. The entire US only tests 120k/day according to the CDC.

The virus was going to come regardless, we could have “flattened the curve” way before with mass testing and earlier social distancing rules. Could have prevented a total lockdown that we’re seeing today


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted

I'm not so sure. As you said, the virus was coming. We all knew that.

Without a vaccine, it's yet to be seen if this lockdown is actually gonna help. There are still so many essential things we have to do that open us to infection.

Really no way to know.

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk

Posted

Shut down the Wet Markets and bring back manufacturing to the homeland.

Just my humble opinion.

 

:flag:

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s been stated here repeatedly. Our elected leaders and highly regarded doctors in the beginning said nothing to worry about. When they found different the shut down began. At the time politics kicked in the opposition said it was racist. It all well documented. A few days ago at the nightly presser it was a well documented power point presentation. It got out of hand and the president corrected it for the record. Using the opposition own words. Disingenuous ( news) people they are. The one time politics should be out. If you’re not watching those and your propaganda news stations. You’re not informed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm all for more testing and having tests available when you need one but that only means so much in the situation we are in now. You could test Billy Bob on a Monday and it's negative so he's all clear and good, then on Friday he gets the virus and shows no symptoms. Now that Monday test still says he's good and he feels completely fine for the next two weeks while possibly infecting others. So his Monday test was kinda pointless. This is kinda just the way it's going to have to be while they re-open the country.

  • Like 1
Posted

It was bound to happen, it appears to becoming more widespread. From over reaching governors letting power go to their head. The sheep are resisting. You saw the stories. A father in hand cuffs in front of his young daughter. His crime playing with his daughter in an empty park. Fining drive through church goers on Easter, in their cars. Restrictions on purchasing seeds and garden supplies in open stores. While you can buy pot and booze. Next week it’s going to grow. I hope they start emphasizing mask and gloves. And stand back. Otherwise it will get ugly. They better ease it up a little.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
What he's doing in putting mud in the water. 50 states use stats to guide them. My numbers are in lock step with theirs. Imagine that. We use the same data bases. We work with what we CAN know. He's working with what he believes. If he could put a number to his ranting he might be credible. As is, he's noise. 
 
Everyone knows there uncounted cases and deaths. That part he is not wrong about. Stat people know it doesn't matter. There are 7.8 billion people on this planet. 100,000 cases is a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent. These fellas attempt to persuade people that this noise will make a HUGE impact on the results when the truth is at the current ratios it is drown out. He says there are cases and yet can not put a working value to his claim. Well they can and have. They have no need nor wish to publish those numbers because? It didn't make a significant impact on the result. 
 
Let me show you how easy this is. Test 100,000 random people. In that population every possible case to make will be made. I track those people to whatever their end result might be. (Mind you that sample INCLUDES people walking around infected like nothing is wrong who might otherwise have been untested.) From that data, which takes less than a month to clear and a few days to process they now know to a 99.7% certainty  how much of general population is infected. How many are asymtomatic. How many are what race, age, have what secondary condtions. How many will die and how many will live. How many will need vents. What mitigations are in place. 
 

Currently the USA has performed 3.4 MILLON test and have under 700,000 cases. Those numbers are known. 

 

It isn't rocket science. It's statistics.  

 
Some of the states are now publishing testing results. Two and three times the infected population. Has it resulted in some major shift in the results? No! An up tick but nothing that moves the numbers that matter. 

 

He can claim anything but he can't put a number to it......can he....has he. Just noise. 

 

 

You are just plain wrong. Testing (until VERY recently) has required the patient to have severe symptoms for a vast majority of cases skewing the stats. Why you cant see this fundamental statistical flaw is on you. As testing expands, the MR drops. And drops. And drops...

Your response to the actual decline in total deaths is: I dont buy that (a CDC graph mind you). So scientific! I dont buy that all the deaths are caused by covid...

An actual random test on covid antibodies done in CA suggests 55-85x the number of total infections vs. positive tests. Run your CNN/MSNBC fear mongering stats with those figures in mind and we have - what Trump said from the get go - a flu...

Funny how this got ramped up right after the impeachment vote failed. I stated this VERY EARLY in this thread:

SOMEONE WITH AN AXE TO GRIND AT THE CDC HAS THEIR FINGER ON THE PANIC BUTTON.

Doctors will never go against the CDC, as they can be sued, but they know. Also dont believe the BS "front line" instagram posts from drama queens - we have one at my work - and its 100% embelished attention grabbing mellinialism. RULE 1 ‐ You never take out your phone in full PPE...

Antibody testing will expose all of this - will you then admit you are wrong?

(Sorry - I had to jump back in this post, as Im really bored at my huge empty hospital today. We should be getting very busy soon with all the posponed real medical needs finally getting addressed next week. God bless Texas...)





Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...