Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Skip school for a year. So what you graduate at 19. What do they think would happen? Forget everything they learned? 

 (Isn't really about kids, is it?) 

Can't skip the school year. The kids need some form of learning, whatever that may be. They will lose the basics in math and language arts. 

  • Like 2
Posted

We went on a short trip to our favorite casino. It was a first time out since the bug. People were following the mandates in the few states we traveled. Mostly stopped at truck stops. Fast food lobbies were closed. The casinos were full of old people also following the mandates. It was a prelude for our cross country trip in three weeks. I feel much better about it. Testing the water was a success. To all you stay at home sissies. By all means do it. The rest exercise your freedoms. By the way if I get the bug I’ll let you all know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

2 consecutive 4 day periods adding a million world wide cases. Yea, a million cases every four days. 

 

Skip school for a year. So what you graduate at 19. What do they think would happen? Forget everything they learned? 

 (Isn't really about kids, is it?) 

You’re right, the liberal justification for keeping the schools closed is not about the kids. Or the teachers for that matter. If it was, there wouldn’t even be a question to open them. Myself and everyone else in the world knows that’s the right thing to do. The studies aren’t ambiguous, read one. Any one of them.

 

And stop calling them cases. They are positive test results, nothing more. A case to me would at least imply having symptoms, and maybe even requiring medical care. The people who feel just fine but visit the drive thru test out of curiosity (or to get off of work for two weeks) are NOT cases in my view. And there’s a LOT of these people.
 

It may be splitting hairs but I see it as deliberate fear mongering nonetheless.

  • Like 2
Posted

The advantages of staying home in your own state or province is it limits spread, makes for easier monitoring and keeps your money local.    I don't consider myself a sissie and I choose to make decisions that support my provincial efforts.  Containment and contact tracing are terms that make a lot of sense when dealing with this virus. Both are made less effective when we travel out of state/province.   I remember back in January when news specials were illustrating how global plane travel effectively spreads a virus like this all around the world.  In a short time we were all fighting a pandemic that air travel distributed.  We now have a pretty good handle on the air travel spread and can reduce the numbers of infected people arriving and departing at airports.  Travelling through out our vast countries will spread the virus within our countries' borders.  Currently states and provinces have a range in numbers of infections.   Travel will only serve to bring those with low numbers up.  It would be great if it worked the opposite way!

  • Like 1
Posted

^^^All null and void if you wear your mask correct?^^^

We all know how and why the numbers are the way they are. Let’s not kid ourselves here. It’s not because of you and me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

The only ones counting cases are the countries that count and like I have said, "It's all meaningless and useless for infliction that will encounter almost every A$$hole on the planet in a couple seasons"

Fauci, Your MASK...lol yeah, the mask?  Trump, Biden...etc. closing Schools, Gyms, etc.  Yeah..all that is going to keep you SAFE!  Safe from what?  Zombies?

 

It's .8% like I believed it to be the IFR so the sooner you all get over the fear mongering and let the FAT die off we can move on!

These are studies which are finally coming that do keep the noise,trash data out!

Yes, the risk is definitively there on the older generation so You want to maintain distance, less encounters, "MASK UP" inform those people to follow the guidelines etc. and let the VIRUS RUN IT"COURSE the sooner the better FOLKS!  At our present clip....we can have 30-40% USA population already exposed..."MOOT VACCINE POINT" come January 2021.  Also, I will be IDIOT #1 UNO EN NUMERO TRUMP SUPPORTER BIDEN LOATHER not standing in line for your manufactured COVID-19 Vaccine!  That juice is for all you SHEEP get in line!

 

Kilpatrick and others say they are eagerly awaiting large studies that estimate fatality rates across age groups and among those with pre-existing health conditions, which will provide the most accurate picture of how deadly the disease is. One of the first studies to account for the effect of age was posted on a preprint server last week. The study, based on seroprevalence data from Geneva, Switzerland, estimates an IFR of 0.6% for the total population, and an IFR of 5.6% for people aged 65 and older.

  • Like 3
Posted
20 hours ago, txab said:

We had one coach that spread it around to a couple of other adults. Kids have all been fine

hmm...Never heard that before or seen the literature about kids....Close the schools until 2021

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mookdoc6 said:

hmm...Never heard that before or seen the literature about kids....Close the schools until 2021

Kids have been fine.  Coach just passed it on to a couple of other adults that hung around with him

Posted

So, the post rolls on.

 

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but don't you think (remember, just my opinion) it is curious that the masks are being pushed so hard as a "band aid" stop (containment) gap for the virus?

The virus started in a country where their culture has been wearing face masks for years in fear contracting whatever the new flavor of the month virus might be.

 

The Seattle and Vancouver BC areas are very diversified in how many cultures coexist here, and the Asian presence have always wore some sort of face covering while in public for years, so once again, just my opinion, and no I do not like being in a mask all day at work, and everywhere else I go, while still seeing more cases reported each day. 

  • Like 1
Posted

What I don’t understand is these mlb players wearing masks. They are tested daily.

Also if masks are so effective
Then quit closing everything down and open up. Don’t understand this either


Ryan B.

  • Like 3
Posted

1.  Masks aren't perfect.  Only an idiot presents them that way.  It only helps in reducing transmission.

2.  Tests aren't perfect.  The most accurate tests also take the longest to get results.  So getting tested daily over a period of time, the results you get today show you who was infected one or more days ago.

3.  I lived in Vancouver, BC for more than 10 years.  While they have a large Asian population, not a lot of them wore masks on a day-to-day basis.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

So, the post rolls on.

 

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but don't you think (remember, just my opinion) it is curious that the masks are being pushed so hard as a "band aid" stop (containment) gap for the virus?

The virus started in a country where their culture has been wearing face masks for years in fear contracting whatever the new flavor of the month virus might be.

 

The Seattle and Vancouver BC areas are very diversified in how many cultures coexist here, and the Asian presence have always wore some sort of face covering while in public for years, so once again, just my opinion, and no I do not like being in a mask all day at work, and everywhere else I go, while still seeing more cases reported each day. 

Lol...course the posts roll on!  Just like this COVID-19 it's going to roll on in AMERICA until everybody has had enough of the nonsense!  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

Lol...course the posts roll on!  Just like this COVID-19 it's going to roll on in AMERICA until everybody has had enough of the nonsense!  

Let me know where the line starts, I will be there, pretty much done with this crap....

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

1.) There is no KNOWN herd immunity to this virus. 

 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/herd-immunity-and-coronavirus/art-20486808

 

2.) The infection rate required to achieve herd immunity is over 70% of the population. Same article.

 

Even if current infection rates are 10 X higher and we keep the current death count as of today diluting the MR the number of dead to .43%, the number of dead to achieve herd immunity in a world population of 7.8 BILLION is staggering.

23,332,400 DEAD to get immunity IF it can even be done.

You or know one else knows.

 

23.3 MILLION DEAD

 

This is 5th grade math folks not fear mongering

 

Fractions of a percent are HUGE numbers when dealing with pools of BILLIONS.

 

:wtf:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...