Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What's your take on having the Rally this year?

I think it is without a doubt the dumbest idea yet this year.

Too bad if this is your only income of the whole year. Risk the lives of literally thousands of people just so a handful of people get rich. Sad with a capital S. Greedy fu  ckers.

I'll never go there again. I'll go to the Black Hills but avoid Sturgis.

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s pretty simple. There’re adults. If people don’t want to be involved don’t. Stay away from the area. It’s called freedom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted

Haven't been there since sometime in the late 70's. Was riding a Shovel then. SuperGlide FX. It wasn't that great an idea then. 

:crackup:

Posted

It's up the person at this point, go if you want or don't.

 

I think if you said the " Too bad if this is your only income of the whole year" to a person that owned a said business, you'd be in for a ear full. Telling someone that they won't have any money for bills, food or kids, possibly lose their business and livelihood isn't going to go over well with them.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

I’ve owned a few business. They were my life, everything was in them. If someone was willing to come to it I’d be there. This damn bug wouldn’t stand in my way. I worked on old pipelines one false move it’s over. This bug id be laughing. I’m older I’d stay away now. Ten years ago and back, no problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I say adults can make the decision to go or not. People need to decide to risk it or not. It is the same thing as going to a grocery store. I also think people need to take care of themselves how they see fit. If someone wants to where a mask for protection, they can, if they dont want to they can choose not to.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Just call it "Sturgis Protest 2020". Problem solved. No Covid transmission whatsoever.

 

According to the media, protests haven't caused a spike, but a political rally infected 100's most likely

Edited by txab
  • Like 4
Posted
12 hours ago, Bash74 said:

I say adults can make the decision to go or not. People need to decide to risk it or not. It is the same thing as going to a grocery store. I also think people need to take care of themselves how they see fit. If someone wants to where a mask for protection, they can, if they dont want to they can choose not to.

I agree that adults can make decisions  as long as they don't negatively impact others.  Wearing a mask, for example, isn't for your protection. Your protection is from others wearing masks. The way you can choose not to spread the virus is keeping distant from others, frequent hand washing and wearing a mask in public. You have the right, imo, not to wear a mask or wash your hands if you don't touch anything or get within 6 feet of anyone not living with you   Choosing to attend festivities at Sturgis is deliberately putting family, friends and strangers at high risk.  I was a fan of the Sturgis event but my opinion has plummeted knowing that it is a go this year.  We all know there are people who only care about themselves and providing an opportunity to potentially create a significant spike in our Covid 19 death count should not be passed off as "adult choice". 

  • Like 1
Posted
I agree that adults can make decisions  as long as they don't negatively impact others.  Wearing a mask, for example, isn't for your protection. Your protection is from others wearing masks. The way you can choose not to spread the virus is keeping distant from others, frequent hand washing and wearing a mask in public. You have the right, imo, not to wear a mask or wash your hands if you don't touch anything or get within 6 feet of anyone not living with you   Choosing to attend festivities at Sturgis is deliberately putting family, friends and strangers at high risk.  I was a fan of the Sturgis event but my opinion has plummeted knowing that it is a go this year.  We all know there are people who only care about themselves and providing an opportunity to potentially create a significant spike in our Covid 19 death count should not be passed off as "adult choice". 

The same could be said for everything we do in life. I don’t need to make a list it’s just about everything. It’s up to the individual to make a person choice. This is the hot button right now. Don’t worry after the election it will go away. Those riders are very brave. If you don’t want to be around that it’s your choice. They made theirs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:


The same could be said for everything we do in life. I don’t need to make a list it’s just about everything. It’s up to the individual to make a person choice. This is the hot button right now. Don’t worry after the election it will go away. Those riders are very brave. If you don’t want to be around that it’s your choice. They made theirs.

People gathering in large close groups during a pandemic for a social event is a display of selfish behavior and/or ignorance.  I think bravery is a term best used for those demonstrating more selfless behavior.

  • Like 1
Posted
People gathering in large close groups during a pandemic for a social event is a display of selfish behavior and/or ignorance.  I think bravery is a term best used for those demonstrating more selfless behavior.

Most of them are outside. Business owners can practice safe business practices. Unlike the democratic backed violent protests and destruction we see nightly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I agree that adults can make decisions  as long as they don't negatively impact others.  Wearing a mask, for example, isn't for your protection. Your protection is from others wearing masks. The way you can choose not to spread the virus is keeping distant from others, frequent hand washing and wearing a mask in public. You have the right, imo, not to wear a mask or wash your hands if you don't touch anything or get within 6 feet of anyone not living with you   Choosing to attend festivities at Sturgis is deliberately putting family, friends and strangers at high risk.  I was a fan of the Sturgis event but my opinion has plummeted knowing that it is a go this year.  We all know there are people who only care about themselves and providing an opportunity to potentially create a significant spike in our Covid 19 death count should not be passed off as "adult choice". 
Wrong. The wearing mask for others protection is just some stupid thing thought up to control and get people to wear masks because they knew people wouldn't. They went with the emotional unselfish route to get people to wear one. If I am wearing a mask next to a person that is wearing one, and he is standing next to someone wearing one, then we all choose to protect ourselves. If I am wearing one and the person next to me isn't I protected myself because I choose to, and he made the adult decision not to, and accepted the risk. His protection is not my responsibility because of his own decision. See that's the problem these days and not just with the virus. People look at others to take care of them instead of taking care of themselves. If everyone would just take care of themselves if they can then everything would be so much better.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
Wrong. The wearing mask for others protection is just some stupid thing thought up to control and get people to wear masks because they knew people wouldn't. They went with the emotional unselfish route to get people to wear one. If I am wearing a mask next to a person that is wearing one, and he is standing next to someone wearing one, then we all choose to protect ourselves. If I am wearing one and the person next to me isn't I protected myself because I choose to, and he made the adult decision not to, and accepted the risk. His protection is not my responsibility because of his own decision. See that's the problem these days and not just with the virus. People look at others to take care of them instead of taking care of themselves. If everyone would just take care of themselves if they can then everything would be so much better.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk


Every thing I’ve seen or read about most mask are. You wearing a mask knocks back most of your germs. It’s not protecting you from the non mask wearing individual. Otherwise who would care. I wear one for the comfort of the other individual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
8 hours ago, Bash74 said:

 If I am wearing one and the person next to me isn't I protected myself 

The non-surgical masks you see in general use are intended to divert the user's breath from spreading their "germs".  Masks are particularly helpful during the period of time when the user is unknowingly infected.  "Non-surgical" masks provide little personal protection for the user.  If you want to ensure your safety,  yet choose to stand next to people not wearing a mask,  you need a much higher level of protection.   

There is a lot of medical advice that comes from trusted buddies and/or politicians.  However, you will find more helpful information is available to help you determine the safest path.   "Masks" vary in their uses and effectiveness.  The ones you see worn in the general public help reduce the spread.  The informed user will still strive to maintain a distance from others, especially people who are bare faced. 

The impact of this virus is a global issue and is commonly used as a political football.  However, the threat is serious for everyone and there are basic, common sense, steps you can take to reduce the impact to you and your loved ones.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
    • The use of absolutes like "always" to describe gear selection, and giving free advice at a boat ramp sounds like a recipe for disaster. It's a boat ramp, not a farm, for starters.   IMO gear selection should depend on the obstacle. If low range is working and this is a slower speed, controlled ordeal, I'd keep using that.
    • I had a boat for many years, never had a problem even with a 2 wheel drive 93 Silvy for 20 years. Good tires, proper use of the gas pedal worked.
    • I read through that and I won't lie, my eyes rolled at some of the quirks about how it can turn off the trailer braking for example but I can see how it could help control or even up the torque applied to the ground with each wheel in a boat ramp scenario. But of course what it can't do is increase the torque to the wheels if the need is there as it ends up being like driving the four wheel drive version of a two wheel drive ( high range that is ). So far the neighbor that ended up with the 3.0 duramax with the max tow package which meant the 3.73 gears and high range only, I think its been doing ok for what he has been towing but doubt he ventures off into the soft stuff with his holiday trailer. He may have towed his dads river boat locally with it ( he always used his 6.6 duramax before ), I'll have to ask him sometime if he got into a lack of power to the wheels situation as after all that engine produces a lot of torque at low speed once the turbo winds out a bit and I think it has the 10 speed and if so they have a pretty good first gear ratio at 4.70 I see which is vastly better than the 3 or four speed overdrive models of years ago. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...