Jump to content

Auto vs 2WD - MPG Question

JAshworth03
 Share

Recommended Posts

JAshworth03 Enthusiast

JAshworth03

Posted
Posted

All,

 

I can't remember what the final verdict was here.  If I am in "Auto" mode do I lose any MPG benefits?  I usually drive in 2WD mode, but with the roads getting a little worse with the weather, I was wondering if I should just leave it in Auto.

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

Yes, slightly less mpg with it in auto as the actuator on the front axle stays engaged.

 

 

 

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

It’s probably not a huge difference but it stands to reason that when in “auto” there is more drag (and wear). The axle shafts and front driveshaft are spinning in auto, everything is engaged and waiting for torque from the transfer case clutch.

  • Like 2
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

.5mpg at best maybe?  As long as it sees no traction loss, only 5% of power will flow to the front end and the diff will be engaged so the rear wheels are still doing 95% of the driving work.  

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
Posted

Like others say, wear and tear. I keep mine 2WD unless it's pouring outside.

  • Like 2
Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted

On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

Auto is perfect for light snow/ sloppy roads with mixed snow cover. I rarely even use 4 high.
 

Auto does allow some brief slip at first and you can still spin a bit, but you’ll never really get stuck unless it’s some nasty stuff.


Auto 4x4 is also my default drag race / gap the car alongside of me at a stoplight mode. 

Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

I used to be like that. Then a semi changed lanes and ran me into the median. It was a nightmare getting to the hubs in the deep snow. Once I did I was able to back right out. I left then locked in winter weather after that until trucks with hubs went awry.

 

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Auto 4x4 is also my default drag race / gap the car alongside of me at a stoplight mode. 

Why not toss in 4 High for that?  Seems like it'd be just a little more slippage and more wear on the clutch.  It's only like 3-4 seconds to swap between.

  • Like 1
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

Why not toss in 4 High for that?  Seems like it'd be just a little more slippage and more wear on the clutch.  It's only like 3-4 seconds to swap between.

Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.

  • Like 1
Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.

LOL.. touche

 

I have made the mistake of forgetting to turn it off and then get the dreaded... "noooo ... I don't wanna turn"

 

Took it up to GLD for a few bone-stock passes.  Hit a 14 flat but I think a ton of that is due to the speed cap at 98.  FWIW, I also brake torqued a few passes and then just stabbed it.  Stabbing knocked 2 tenths off

Edited by Rob Mugs
Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.
And with the clutch slip there is less chance of the front tires bending the tie rods and going full toe in. I know these trucks really don't have the power to do that easily but it can happen. It's common on Duramax powered trucks. Plus when crossing the slick crosswalk lines all the power going to the front end could break something. It's not as heavy duty as it's not intended to be the only one operating.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
LOL.. touche
 
I have made the mistake of forgetting to turn it off and then get the dreaded... "noooo ... I don't wanna turn"
 
Took it up to GLD for a few bone-stock passes.  Hit a 14 flat but I think a ton of that is due to the speed cap at 98.  FWIW, I also brake torqued a few passes and then just stabbed it.  Stabbing knocked 2 tenths off
I was crossing the mountains in Southern Oregon and Northern California a few years ago. It was snowing hard. I was towing my travel trailer with my Duramax. The CHP chain enforcement check point made me chain up the trailer. Not the truck because it's 4WD. Just the trailer. Even though it has BF Goodrich all terrain TAs on it. I was not happy about it. When I stopped to take them off I forgot to take it out of 4WD. I didn't notice it until I got to LA. It was jumping trying to turn backing into the RV spot. As best I can tell it didn't hurt anything. Mostly freeway and it was raining hard the whole time.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

GMP Enthusiast

GMP

Posted
Posted

Even in auto front diff is still engaged. Will wear parts eventually. Brother in law left his in auto for two years blew out his front diff. Only use when needed. 

BigMick2023 Enthusiast

BigMick2023

Posted
Posted

A lot of cars have full time AWD, so why is it such a wear item on this truck to leave it in Auto (AWD)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...