Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, econometrics said:

The 2022 Raptor debuts in less than 24 hours. With a 5.2L supercharged V8, it seems. 

 

So... yeah... GM is once again (WAY) behind the 8 ball in this sector. 

But we have new Trail boss commercials! 

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

But we have new Trail boss commercials! 

? ?? 

 

I do think GM greased the sweet spot with the TB/AT4. No doubt about that. Adding a modest 2" lift to a truck and making it appear "off road" for all us city-slickers that love trucks was a good idea. I would never buy a TRX or Raptor, but I would 100% buy an AT4. 

 

Regardless, Raptors and TRXs bring the eyeballs. And it's just not that hard for GM to do this, seriously. They already have the powertrains for it. Just put some Fox or Bilsteins on a TB with some beefier components and the 6.2L whiner under the hood and go enjoy your added profit margins. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, econometrics said:

 

Regardless, Raptors and TRXs bring the eyeballs. And it's just not that hard for GM to do this, seriously. They already have the powertrains for it. Just put some Fox or Bilsteins on a TB with some beefier components and the 6.2L whiner under the hood and go enjoy your added profit margins. 

Would see super easy right ?  And yeh you nailed it , enjoy the profit. We know there are people who have no issues dropping 100k on a truck . 

Posted

Mary is the problem here imo, she has no passion for automotive design, form or function and that lack of enthusiasm rubs off onto all of us customers too. Not saying she is a bad CEO or bad at what she does, just that she lacks the passion that some others seem to have to make a great product like Ford and Dodge right now. As others have said all the parts are already on the shelf to make something great but when the boss doesn't have any interest then we get what we have now.

 

Mary no doubt would make a great coat hanger factory CEO, it's a shame she was handed the keys to one of the most iconic american automotive brands and is turning it into an appliance factory it seems like.

Posted
Mary is the problem here imo, she has no passion for automotive design, form or function and that lack of enthusiasm rubs off onto all of us customers too. Not saying she is a bad CEO or bad at what she does, just that she lacks the passion that some others seem to have to make a great product like Ford and Dodge right now. As others have said all the parts are already on the shelf to make something great but when the boss doesn't have any interest then we get what we have now.
 
Mary no doubt would make a great coat hanger factory CEO, it's a shame she was handed the keys to one of the most iconic american automotive brands and is turning it into an appliance factory it seems like.

I agree. GM usually was on the cutting edge for style and performance. At least they didn’t lag behind when the weren’t. I’ve owned some big engine basic rides the GM had over the years. Besides some of the Impalas I’ve owned. The trailblazer SS was my all time favorite. Basically a corvette SUV at a reasonable price. Ford and Ram will give you a V-8 in a single cab. GM treats the 6.2 like it’s the holy grail. It’s not. There are dealers that will build sport trucks. But you have to buy a package driving up the cost. Probably a lost art anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

A single cab short bed 6.2 in a high trim level would be my pick. All these off road trucks are great but I have no need for them. A good “get around town” street truck is what I need

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with @KARNUT and @Descartian 

I loved my 06 Trailblazer SS. It was unique, fast, could corner very well for an SUV, carry 5 people, and tow my boat. It was a complete package. I on the other hand are in need of a crew cab sport truck because of the size of my family. GM has completely abandoned the sport/high performance market when it comes to their Trucks and SUVs. It’s a shame because I thought the SS truck started out pretty good. The 06-09 Impala SS was a true sleeper sedan, and the Trailblazer SS was an all time favorite of mine. And I might get ridiculed for this but the Cobalt SS with its turbo 4 cylinder was no slouch either.  Just not my cup of tea. 
I also think the new blazer (which I drove in RS trim) does very well and GM is crazy for not putting a 5.3L in that or a twin turbo 3.6L for SS trim. It’s a real shame and it really upsets me

 

Btw. I talked to a good friend who is a salesman today and stated just wait for the Hummer. It can go 0-60 in 3 secs. That’s fine and dandy but here in the Midwest we don’t have the electric charging stations anywhere around here in Iowa. It’s not feasible for us to have something like that.  Plus, I’d rather have a good old fashioned V8 supercharged with a nice exhaust tone. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is a pic of my SS. I had running boards on it for winter to keep down on the road debris and rock chips. They were notorious for rock chips. Had the TSB rock chip repair done on it once. I miss this thing!

DA2E3E6B-4C1C-47CA-BD5D-23D058E822F4.jpeg

DF40E44C-24DD-4CDA-99FB-21BF655E4E75.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

A Colorado Extreme with a twin turbo V6 would make more sense than a V8. The first green Colorado chassis was not meant to have a V8, so they had to notch it in order to cram the 5.3 under the hood. Assume the same with the current generation.

About a year ago The Fast Lane truck asked a GM senior executive about the possibility of a Raptor fighter. The only words out of the executive's mouth was, "The Raptor is dead." Furthermore, Chevy has been testing a Silverado in Nevada at an offroad racing event called Mint 400. The test mules have supercharged 6.2 V8s and larger multimatic socks on it like the Colorado ZR2 has. Is love to know which supercharged V8 is under the hood. Could it be pumping 750+bhp? It was allegedly going to debut in 2021, but COVID pushed it back to 2022. GM has event it needs on the shelf to do this. They just need to do it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

With all this electronic talk of late, I told the wife we’re buying the supercharged V8 within the next year or two. It most likely will be a ZL1 because the price is great but I’ll be entertaining the Hellcats, the Shelby GT500, and now the Cadillac. 

Posted

image.png.bfe1212b2df4a8bdfa669c2fab601437.png

 

This is my 07 awd Trailblazer SS with an "intake and tune only" maybe on the way to a 13.08 pass.

 

 

image.png.c5edd32a33e8265811723f899569c08a.png

 

This is my 06 Impala SS, with just a tune (and the front headlight out) it ran 14.0.  I didn't like that car that much, only had it a little over a year.  

 

  • Like 1
Posted

When I bought my 06 trailblazer SS I was doing sales and training. I still had my 04 Z-71. In the garage was our 94 Impala SS and the Acura intagra type R. My wife was driving her recently purchased Elantra. My son was driving our 94 Z-28. Having the trailblazer for my work vehicle I felt the I was in car heaven. Driving 50-60K miles a year I was never happier with my long distance driving.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, SILVER SLED said:

image.png.bfe1212b2df4a8bdfa669c2fab601437.png

 

This is my 07 awd Trailblazer SS with an "intake and tune only" maybe on the way to a 13.08 pass.

 

 

image.png.c5edd32a33e8265811723f899569c08a.png

 

This is my 06 Impala SS, with just a tune (and the front headlight out) it ran 14.0.  I didn't like that car that much, only had it a little over a year.  

 

My best friend who owns his tint business bought his son a 2007 silver SS impala and has it tuned, CAI, and rebuilt beefed up tranny and that thing runs hard. He loves it. May I ask what you didn’t like about yours???

btw.  Love the white SS trailblazer 

Posted
12 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

My best friend who owns his tint business bought his son a 2007 silver SS impala and has it tuned, CAI, and rebuilt beefed up tranny and that thing runs hard. He loves it. May I ask what you didn’t like about yours???

btw.  Love the white SS trailblazer 

I had just had my second child.  Rear facing car seats didn't fit well, front wheel drive was a challenge launching.  I realized I just don't like front wheel drive cars much.  Then as the Trailblazer SS's came out I really wanted one of those, the car seats fit and I saw how well they ran, so I offed the loaded with leather Impala SS and got a cloth 1SS Trailblazer.  The Trailblazer SS will go down as one of my favorite cars.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 414 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...