Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank You Black02Silverado, yes trucks are high dollar, but think I will keep mine.

 

Thank You m3n00b, I would guess about the same price here in Northern Michigan.

 

Thank You VanguardK2, I think your correct about re-gearing.  With the trailer Dry weight at basically 7500 pounds, I figure loaded about 8000 to 8500, and probably Waaay too heavy for the 3.08 gears without eventually causing damage. 

If it is re-geared, do you feel the 3.42 gear is good enough, or should I go with 3.73 gears???

 

Thank You

Posted

Go with the 3.73s.  That's what the NHTs in the previous generation have and they are towing beasts.

Posted
Thank You Newdude and Garagerog!
So, I have a GM Truck not Capable of Towing the Rockwood that was made for Canada, wow.
And to think I sold my old 72 Ford that could have hauled just about anything, for this GM Truck, what a Shame.
 
You should have done your research. Don't assume all trucks can tow 9000+ . The ones with your 3.08 gears are worthless for towing anything over 5000 lbs.
Don't blame GM for you ignorance. Wow.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Posted

i agree with james , 3.73 is the way to go but the NHTs have a 9.76 carrier and the others have 9.5 so stock gearing wont fit. so cost wise go 3.42 unless you can find a complete rear diff with 3.73

Posted
1 hour ago, silveradosid said:

i agree with james , 3.73 is the way to go but the NHTs have a 9.76 carrier and the others have 9.5 so stock gearing wont fit. so cost wise go 3.42 unless you can find a complete rear diff with 3.73

Whats NHT’s? 😂 wonder if u could find a full rearend with 3.73

Posted

Dieselfan1,  Thank You, I did look at various trucks.  But, GM should not have put tow Capacity at 8500 Lbs., other wise I would not have Bought my truck!

 

Other than towing capacity, I really like like my GM Truck.  In hindsite, I had No Plans on buying a big travel trailer, and would not have, if not for now raising 3 Grandchildren. 

Will admit, it would be nice to afford one of those 2500 Diesel crew cab 4x4 but not in the cards money wise.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank You swathdiver, silveradosid, Frankielozano214.

I will look for a full axle 3.73 rear and front 3.73.  If I am going to spend the money, might as well have extra tow capacity.  Wish I would have bought a truck with the 3.73 in the first place.

 

Thanks Again everyone-

  • Like 3
Posted

You're a hero for giving these children a second chance for a proper upbringing.  Thank you.  I was fortunate to know the towing capabilities of my truck when looking for a trailer and was able to find a proper match.  I knew about the re-gearing option and the various ways to deal with heavier tongue weights.   For the same reason you are hesitant to buy a used vehicle with unknown history is the same reason I wouldn't choose to add red flags to my vehicle. I'd seriously look at trading the truck or the trailer.  If I was looking for a trailer the size of your Rockwood, I'd set my sights on a base 2500/3500.  I find the most basic WT has a list of standard features that exceed the options list on your '72 Ford! 

  • Like 4
Posted

Thank You Donstar,

appreciate the courtesy.  

I will look for a used 2500/3500, have to be a great deal, Gas or Diesel?

 

I like the day to day gas mileage on the 1500, and really took good care of my truck, planning on it being my last.

Posted
1 hour ago, James Beyer said:

Thank You Donstar,

appreciate the courtesy.  

I will look for a used 2500/3500, have to be a great deal, Gas or Diesel?

 

I like the day to day gas mileage on the 1500, and really took good care of my truck, planning on it being my last.

A diesel would be nice but more expensive to buy and maintenance can present some costly surprises.  I'd look for gas.  You are right that you will return to gas consumption reminiscent of your '72 Ford.  However, the experiences you may face towing a trailer with an underrated tow vehicle will likely be more upsetting than higher fuel costs.  

Posted

Thank You Donstar, will see what is available near me.  Under rated truck to tow doesn't sound like fun.

 

Mert Tas, had a 8N for many years, great tractor.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, James Beyer said:

Thank You Donstar, will see what is available near me.  Under rated truck to tow doesn't sound like fun.

 

Mert Tas, had a 8N for many years, great tractor.

James, you are a very nice man, thanking all comments when some are just 🤔🤨

 

The 2500/3500 is a good plan, just for the fact swapping gears, will still put you at your trucks limits with the trailer. Then factor in the truck itself, passengers and gear, full tank of gas, and the trailer, which will have propane tanks, water tanks for fresh and sewer. It all adds up fast.

 

Better to have more truck than you need, mainly because you can not replace passengers like cargo if things go wrong on the highway.

  • Like 2
Posted

Agree with Jim here, a regear would be my fix but I honestly wasn't factoring in people and gear to max out the 3.73s and going waaay past the 3.42s the 2500/3500 gambit is the best choice. I sympathize with O.P as I bought a 16 5.3l because I wanted black, leather and CC short bed with the face-lift model and color match bumpers. My only regret is getting some with an 8 speed but that's what I found that I wanted to the tee and sometimes there's one small change that just isn't perfect for what you need it for.

Fortunately people have a new generation to trade in for, so there's plenty of trucks available. Advise to the O.P, look out of your state for them. I was when looking for mine and found some good deals, but before I pulled the trigger on one from Arizona I found the one I have. Just ask for pictures of the frame for rust and other concerns. I was given many from that particular dealer and I was fully willing to fly out of state and pay for the truck if I hadn't found mine.

To Jim, we all know what comment your referring. I think we all felt the same way about it.

The o.p even stated the owners manual and door sticker didn't match which WOULD make it GMs fault. Not everybody knows about everything to look for on trucks and the propaganda from their respective manufacturers on the model l. They don't know and sometimes it's a problem and sometimes it's not. This just happened to be one of those times.

Sent from my SM-G986U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, James Beyer said:

Thank You swathdiver, silveradosid, Frankielozano214.

I will look for a full axle 3.73 rear and front 3.73.  If I am going to spend the money, might as well have extra tow capacity.  Wish I would have bought a truck with the 3.73 in the first place.

 

Thanks Again everyone-

You do not have to replace the entire 12-bolt rear axle to upgrade to 3.73 gears.  You can purchase a more stout carrier that is stronger than the one you have though and put the 3.73 gears on it.  The front differential will handle 3.73s easily.

 

Go to LKQs website and put in  your vehicle and what you are looking for and they will show you what's available and for how much.  Remember, your K2s have 12-bolt axles, both 9.5 and 9.76 depending on options.  AAM (demandaam.com) was the original supplier to GM.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank You Swathdiver,

if I change to the 3.73 rear, does that also increase my payload?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...