Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think all of the upgrades pretty much addressed what GM was getting hit over the head for in the first place. For me and just for me personally, I'd want the F/R lockers with ventilated seats (living in Arizona and all). 

 

8" screen is fine, column shifter I prefer, and the interior is tough enough for my Siberian Husky and my 15 month old. Those two do a number on cars.

 

The HC and Denali needed a nicer interior to be more "competitive" with the other luxury trucks and initial impressions are showing it will be class leading.

 

This refresh will be a winner and compliment an already very good/excellent truck.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

Can confirm TRX is dumb. And hilarious.

 

E9976DE3-CC63-417E-9791-78E743BCB9D1.thumb.jpeg.a1b42ee9f00f4dbd7c4b26e76ff6bfab.jpeg

Did you finally get your TRX?  If you did congrats. Wish GM had the b@lls to put a supercharger on the 6.2L.  Atleast as a factory option. What a waste!  Anyone saying 420HP is enough haven’t been in any really fast cars/trucks. It’s addicting and a glorious hoot!!!  
 

buddy has an Avalanche with a supercharged 6.2L, forges pistons, and race cam, and 4.10 rear end and that thing screams. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

Did you finally get your TRX?  If you did congrats. Wish GM had the b@lls to put a supercharger on the 6.2L.  Atleast as a factory option. What a waste!  Anyone saying 420HP is enough haven’t been in any really fast cars/trucks. It’s addicting and a glorious hoot!!!  
 

buddy has an Avalanche with a supercharged 6.2L, forges pistons, and race cam, and 4.10 rear end and that thing screams. 


Yeah, it came in last month. Well worth the 4 month wait. It’s ridiculous and way quicker than anything this size deserves to be.

 

Nothing stopping GM from doing the same except their leadership. CEO and half the people in that video are women. They don’t understand that we men are dumb and need high horsepower in everything for no good reason.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 3
Posted

To be honest, I'm happy they went with the stock 6.2 in the ZR2. That means it's more likely to be priced well below a TRX or Raptor for those of us who want a better overlanding/trail rig and leaves room for Chevy to do a ZR2 Bison with a blown 6.2 and a redone high-articulation suspension (rather than just REALLY good shocks on the stock TB suspension that is the Silverado ZR2)

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, econometrics said:

 

LOL, wow. You really have a bias against the T1s. 


I’m still not over dropping Cocoa/Dune interiors. If I wanted to be ensconced in all black, I’d become a mortician. 🙃

 

This new interior upgrade looks great, I just question whey they weren’t launched with it. GM management never misses a beat to miss a beat.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Mandalorian said:


I’m still not over dropping Cocoa/Dune interiors. If I wanted to be ensconced in all black, I’d become a mortician. 🙃

 

This new interior upgrade looks great, I just question whey they weren’t launched with it. GM management never misses a beat to miss a beat.

 

 

GM management is about every last penny, simple as that. But hey that’s their business model and it makes them millions so who am I 

Posted
15 hours ago, OnTheReel said:


Yeah, it came in last month. Well worth the 4 month wait. It’s ridiculous and way quicker than anything this size deserves to be.

 

Nothing stopping GM from doing the same except their leadership. CEO and half the people in that video are women. They don’t understand that we men are dumb and need high horsepower in everything for no good reason.


Glad you’re staying around here on the forum. It’s always nice to have your input. 
 

Does the TRX rear window leak?! 😂🤦🏻‍♂️

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 hours ago, econometrics said:


Glad you’re staying around here on the forum. It’s always nice to have your input. 
 

Does the TRX rear window leak?! 😂🤦🏻‍♂️


I do keep checking it…old habit I guess. 😁

  • Like 3
Posted

Over I like the new interior, I think the previous exterior design was nicer but I am sure I will like it eventually. Really excited to see the gmc Denali reveal..  A couple interesting things I’ve noticed in pictures, looks like we finally get power steering column, don’t see adjustable pedals button anywhere, still miss that from the k2s. Also don’t see an ac outlet in the centre console, although it could be somewhere else. Would definitely miss that for my laptop. Don’t see a 12 v plug, but most people probably don’t use that. Also wondering where/if the aux buttons would go in this version. Sure hope they didn’t forget that... Looks like no room to left of steering wheel anymore, which wasn’t a great spot. Would like to see them on ceiling like Ford has had for a long time. Hate the centre console shifter just such a bad waste of space. But the wireless charger is in a better spot, guess they had to with that shifter taking all the room now.  

1993DA60-3C84-41C9-9EC6-7BB52E5A70F0.jpeg

Posted
9 hours ago, f8l vnm said:

GM management is about every last penny, simple as that. But hey that’s their business model and it makes them millions so who am I 

 

Other automakers operate the exact same way, yet they still manage to launch with better interiors

  • Like 1
Posted

They were just in a complete rush to get the GM trucks out for 2019, and it shows. Not only in the interior, but with the overall build quality we saw early on. I loved my 2016 Sierra but my 19 Silverado was…ehh…very difficult.
 

GM spent a lot on the chassis and powertrains. So the T1 has always had the bones to be the best. I think this refresh will take it there.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It's not bad, and as others have said it addresses some things people have complained about.  Lockers are great, the extra lift is just 33's instead of 32's it should have had in the first place.   It does have some extra wheel travel and articulation but still significantly less than a Raptor.   Suspension should be improved, but still vastly inferior to the computer controlled on the fly dampening and linkage rear the Raptor has.   It will be interesting to see if it still has the 2+" front end nose dive the Trail Boss/AT4's do, on the commercial they all look very level, but many times what's in the ads/commercial isn't want shows up on dealer lots.   That might be great for a work pickup, but a real off road package truck should sit very close to level.   Front bumper is a good start, they could have done more with the rear.   It should have had 35's, but that would take some major work. Console shifter I could take or leave, to me it takes up a lot of room that could be used for storage, I'd' rather see it stay on the column or be a knob.  Interior is fine, screen looks like what the Buick's have had for awhile.  Hopefully they made the seats more comfortable than my AT4.  They need to step into 2015 and offer a panoroof. 

 

GM is in a bad position, they basically have to keep the price low, and the only way to do that is offer less and market it.   A current AT4 loaded is $65k, if this new version pushes $70k, a mid tier Raptor that has more tech, more power, and way more off road capability is ~$72k.    Lots of guys wanted to see a supercharger in it, but then it's probably close to $80k and for that you can basically get a tier 2 TRX and the TRX is so far beyond what GM can even dream in off road tech and design it's not even funny.    420hp is perfectly adequate but it's nothing special.   Dodge's standard motor is 410hp, Raptor is 450hp,  2022 Tundra is probably going to be over 400hp,  GM makes a big deal out of the 6.2L but it's nothing special anymore, aside that it seems to eat lifters like a fat kid eats cake.  The Raptor was built from the ground up from off roading, GM is just taking their standard half ton and bolting a couple toys on it and the price needs to reflect that.

 

 

Edited by todd308
  • Like 2
Posted

Car and Driver thinks it will weigh in around $55K to start. I think that’s close to accurate. My guess was closer to $60K. 
 

For what you’re getting with the ZR2, that’s a good price. I think it’s smart to sell something $10K cheaper than the Raptor and TRX, knowing it’s not either of those. I’d personally rather have a $55K non supercharged ZR2 vs a $70K alternative for a little more punch in the pedal. 

Posted
On 9/9/2021 at 9:18 AM, BIGDOGx said:

I like the zr2 even though I'm thinking it will touch the 90-100k mark, especially considering gm has the ability to probably only build a couple thousand right now so dealers will be marking up the hell out of em imo. Not sure i like the new grill but the 8 year old interior has thankfully been somewhat addressed.

No way that will MSRP at 90-100k. 

Posted

I'd guess it will add another $5-7k to the truck price, if you figure it will be similar to the price increase for the Colorado ZR2 as the bar.   In the Silverado that's not a huge deal, but in a GMC, that pushes the MSRP to $70k+  For me if the price is even close the Raptor, the Raptor offers so much more truck, in off road prowess, tech features, power, and even convenience/comfort.    The only other "hidden" advantage might be in rebates, you don't see rebates on the Raptor, so if people can still get $5k etc. off the GM's that will help the price gap.   Assuming GM does not exempt that trim from rebates.  $55k to $70k is still a big price gap for the Chevy, but $65k for this in a GMC trim -vs- $70k for a raptor....raptor every day all day.

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,682 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...