Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2021 DRW came with Michelin Primacy XC tires. I noticed today the tires are rated at 28XXlbs at 80 psi. Michelin rates the same tire and size at 3085lbs at 80 psi. 
I only noticed as I’ve been getting close to replacing the factory tires and have been comparing load ratings and going slightly larger with an AT. 
Are the factory tires made cheaper than the one direct from Michelin?

Posted

I have read many different places and been told by a dealership guy, that some tires for some vehicles, even sharing the same name markings and sizes, are made specially for the vehicle manufacturers. Now if you compared the OEM'd tire vs a retail tire, and checked every mark on the tire you may find a difference.  From what I have been told by someone at a dealership the OEM'd tire is made softer and quieter usually to try to help sell the vehicle.

Posted

In short, yes they are.

 

You'll often find that OEM tires have less tread depth on certain tires compared to the tire you buy down at Discount tire.

Posted

The Bridgestone that came on my truck Tire Rack was selling at a discount AND the same tire with a longer tread life warranty at a slightly higher price. Thing is, I got 125K miles from those OEM factory installed tires that performed flawlessly. Lord how long would the replacements last? 😱

 

I know that Honda motorcycle had a deal with Dunlap to produce a 'special' sized tire to fit some Shadow models with a five year lock on production. Handy as the replacement tire cost almost $400 and lasted about 10K miles. 

Posted
1 hour ago, powderMonkey said:

I have read many different places and been told by a dealership guy, that some tires for some vehicles, even sharing the same name markings and sizes, are made specially for the vehicle manufacturers. Now if you compared the OEM'd tire vs a retail tire, and checked every mark on the tire you may find a difference.  From what I have been told by someone at a dealership the OEM'd tire is made softer and quieter usually to try to help sell the vehicle.

You are 100% correct. I did alot of research on this and the tire put on at the factory is not the same tire you get at the tire store even though its the same exact brand and make.

  • Like 1
Posted

The load calculations are the same whether its oem or aftermarket.  Its simply volume vs pressure.  I think you maybe getting confused with load carrying with dual rear wheels vs single rear wheel.  

 

#iworkforGM

Posted

I’ve noticed that car dealership are selling tires now. So are they selling OEM or tires that look like OEM? I don’t think there’s a difference. My tires on my Honda are noisy on certain roads. There’s no way I’m buying that  tire as a replacement. Same if it wore out too fast. It doesn’t make sense. 

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Phobby said:

My 2021 DRW came with Michelin Primacy XC tires. I noticed today the tires are rated at 28XXlbs at 80 psi. Michelin rates the same tire and size at 3085lbs at 80 psi. 
I only noticed as I’ve been getting close to replacing the factory tires and have been comparing load ratings and going slightly larger with an AT. 
Are the factory tires made cheaper than the one direct from Michelin?

 

 

No, they are not rated for less than Michelin says.  This is a simple misunderstanding on your end, let me explain.

 

The 3085lbs at 80psi, that is for a SINGLE tire application so if they were on a 3500 SRW.  

 

Many LT tires carry a dual load rating on them.  There is a load index for single wheel application (SRW truck) and then one for dual wheel (DRW truck) application.  These are printed into the sidewall of the tire as well.

 

The factory Michelins are a 120 load index single wheel/117 load index dual wheel.  117 load index is 2833lbs per tire, x2 for DRW per corner on the rear.

 

Here is the data from Tire Rack on it.  I opened the box showing both load ratings:

 

michelin.thumb.png.a05196e45c3a665b647e092964c7a28a.png

 

Edited by newdude
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I’ve noticed that car dealership are selling tires now. So are they selling OEM or tires that look like OEM? I don’t think there’s a difference. My tires on my Honda are noisy on certain roads. There’s no way I’m buying that  tire as a replacement. Same if it wore out too fast. It doesn’t make sense. 

 

I don't know if the OEM tires are different from the aftermarket versions or not.  I do know that the Michelin LTX AT2 OEMs that come on many of the HDs are a joke as an all terrain tire.  They are absolutely terrible in the snow.  I just about slid off a snow covered logging road with them.  

 

This was new snow on a sideways sloped logging road with a big drop off on the low side.  I was slowly driving through when the rear wheels started slipping.  I put in in 4WD and wound up with four tires slipping and I started sliding off the road.  I managed to get through that spot, then stopped hunting and went immediately to Les Schwab for some real AT tires.  

 

Two days later, after it had warmed up and frozen again--making that spot icy and even worse--I drove thought it in 2WD with no issues.

 

Now this is puzzling to me because the reviews on the Michelin LTX AT2 aftermarket tires say they are one of the best out there.  Michelin is a good company, and the OEM Michelins on my wife's 2019 Acadia work very well in the snow and on ice.

 

This leads me to believe that the OEM Michelin LTX AT2s are not the same as the aftermarket ones.  Regardless, when I pick up my new HD next week my first trip will be to Les Schwab for new tires, and they won't be LTX AT2s.

 

The tire companies may be doing themselves a disservice if they are putting lesser quality tires on new vehicles, but are keeping the same name as the aftermarket.   

 

 

Edited by INTJ
Posted
16 minutes ago, INTJ said:

 

I don't known if the OEM tires are different from the aftermarket versions or not.  I do know that the Michelin LTX AT2 OEMs that come on many of the HDs are a joke as an all terrain tire.  They are absolutely terrible in the snow.  I just about slid off a snow covered logging road with them.  

 

This was new snow on a sideways sloped logging road with a big drop off on the low side.  I was slowly driving through when the rear wheels started slipping.  I put in in 4WD and wound up with four tires slipping and I started sliding off the road.  I managed to get through that spot, then stopped hunting and went immediately to Les Schwab for some real AT tires.  

 

Two days later, after it had warmed up and frozen again--making that spot icy and even worse--I drove thought it in 2WD with no issues.

 

Now this is puzzling to me because the reviews on the Michelin LTX AT2 aftermarket tires say they are one of the best out there.  Michelin is a good company, and the OEM Michelins on my wife's 2019 Acadia work very well in the snow and on ice.

 

This leads me to believe that the OEM Michelin LTX AT2s are not the same as the aftermarket ones.  Regardless, when I pick up my new HD next week my first trip will be to Les Schwab for new tires, and they won't be LTX AT2s.

 

The tire companies may be doing themselves a disservice if they are putting lesser quality tires on new vehicles, but are keeping the same name as they aftermarket.   

That’s why it doesn’t make sense. They could always put a different name on it. It’s done all the time.

  • Like 1
Posted

Not sure if it's still applicable but you used to be able to look on the sidewall of GM OEM tires and see a T Spec designation which indicated a difference between the OEM and replacement tires of the same manufacturer and tire model. If I recall the owners manual alluded to this in the tire section.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

The OEM tires are different than the aftermarket.  GM will have specs to meet for tread wear, plyrat, rolling resistance, stopping distance, ride, handling, etc.  The tire manufacturer determines which tire line meets the specs.  Tire manufacturer's have tire lines available for OEM only, OEM/aftermarket, and aftermarket only.  GM's stopping distance and rolling resistance requirements often lead to different rubber compounds and you generally have to modify the pattern to get the snow acceptable.  In addition, the government has noise tests to meet that limits how aggressive the tire patrern can be.  

 

Goodyear will not sell duratracs in future unless the OE use their tire contructions.  GM will not have a duratracs in the future do to fuel economy and stopping distance issues with duratracs.  You will see goodyear wrangler territory MTs instead.

 

#iworkforGM

Edited by MTU Alum
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

The load calculations are the same whether its oem or aftermarket.  Its simply volume vs pressure.  I think you maybe getting confused with load carrying with dual rear wheels vs single rear wheel.  

 

 

Edited by Phobby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My truck is a 2024 2500 LT crew cab with the 6.6 gas engine and 10 speed trans.  It has a payload of 3578 lbs.  We pull a 22' Grand Design 17MKE that has dry weight of 5006 lbs. and a gross weight of 6395 lbs.  The trailer weighs about 5800 lbs. when loaded up with all the gear.  I don't fill the water tank for travel as most of our trips are to state parks that are within a day's drive.  Depending on the wind I get anywhere from 7.5 to 9 mpg.  I do use a weight distribution hitch (WDH) and have no problems with sway or being pulled/pushed side to side by 18-wheelers passing by me.  The trailer is about the same length of the truck so that helps a lot.  I say that because we traded in our 33' Grand Design 2670 MK (7800 lbs. loaded with gear) and using the same WDH, it would get pulled side to side by big trucks passing by me. It was not bad, but you needed to stay alert and know when a big truck was pulling up beside you.  I got about 7 to 8 mpg pulling that trailer.  I normally drive about 65 to 67 mph when pulling.  Overall, I love the payload capability of the truck as I doubt I will ever get close to its limit and I love the stability it offers over a half ton truck while pulling a trailer.  I have just over 30000 miles on the truck and have not had any issues.  We live in Texas where it is relatively flat, just windy. 
    • I will say though that the 5.00 a gallon for only one fuel stop while on the Number 1, that privilege of driving from the point of Paso Robles ( where I fueled up before crossing to the coast ) and all the way up ... across the Golden Gate where I stopped and walked on the bridge ( and someone jumped off the bridge opposite the side I was on ... never saw it happen but the tow truck/paramedic told me ) and continued on north back onto No 1 and all the way up to where it connects to 101 and also explored some of the Red Woods although had been through some of that before. The fantastic view of that scenic ocean route was most certainly worth the extra dollars I spent on fuel. Just prior to that I had driven through Death Valley and that was some experience in the middle of July, then spent a couple of days in Yosemite and hiked to the top of Half Dome. The summer of 2007 was very memorable for what I saw and experienced in California.
    • Really depends on what extent the towing is.  Are you going across the country on highways or to fairly local campgrounds?  If you're just local towing then I wouldn't derate your truck much, just make sure the weight of your trailer and equipment stays below your limit.  Which for my truck is 14500lbs bumper pull.  Yeah it will work hard when you're over 5 figures in weight but who cares if it is just say 50 miles.    In my opinion the main thing with towing campers is wind resistance.  My 3200lb single axle camper tows fairly hard for what it is due to the wind.  But then if I use my truck to tow a family members 8000lb camper it doesn't really feel any different as wind resistance is similar. I've also towed a 5000lb airstream and it barely felt like anything was there.
    • I think the excitement has run its course. Or, probably need a break from the truck for a few days.   Win some, lose some, again. There was still a coolant weep from the front of the engine. This time it was one of those worm-drive hose clamps on the upper hose connecting to the water neck. There's a reason the factory doesn't use those type of clamps; they suck. The hose is all distorted and flared at the end from someone over-tightening it. The water neck just needed to be cleaned, hose seated, and have a *good* hose clamp put on, if the hose wasn't so mangled.   Thought I'd kill two birds with one stone and try to diagnose the EGR issue. It's likely a failed EGR but before I spent $85 on the part I wanted to make sure ports weren't clogged or the pintle wasn't stuck. It was kind of a bugger to remove with the upper intake installed. Re-install (because I wanted to drive it) proved more difficult.   Per the stack of service paperwork, the EGR has already been replaced 4 times since 1996.   It would reason, then, that the EGR flange on the lower intake manifold has had its share of techs trying to work quickly and maybe one of them seated a bolt slightly cross-threaded at one time. The bolt didn't come out without significant effort and tried as I did, it wouldn't go in without significant effort. And then, the mounting ear on the right side of the EGR (lower intake casting) cracked, and crumbled off. $%&@!!!   I hate everything. Or, at least, I did in that moment. I was pretty calm, considering. This is what older, junky vehicles do. They nickel and dime their owners, piss them off, and things break that shouldn't break because of shoddy design/workmanship, poorly done repairs.   If I want to make it right, I'll need to replace the lower intake manifold and basically re-do everything I spent days doing. At least it should go quicker this time, right?! Looks like a lower intake (used/junk, of course) will run me about $150.   Once I get the new EGR, I'll see if I can bolt it up snug enough to verify proper operation, and if it solves the persistent CEL that sets on decel for EGR flow, I'll know I'm back on the right track. And then I can decide how to proceed.   Also, an idler pulley has given up. It began squeaking in pain on startup. It's clear this truck hasn't been thoroughly driven in a long, long time as things are just letting go and shaking out. I may have given it the beans once or twice to make sure my intake gaskets were doing their job. Flog an old vehicle, expect what it gives in return.    
    • Thanks for the info but wow, these are pricey! $100 apiece. A full set of smaller ones can be had for less that the cost of one of these. Gotta be a cheaper option out there but I have yet to find it. I don't want to use grommets as I can see leaking in my future. Now that I am looking at it, I might be able to just get the valve stem and modify the sensor to fit. Looks like I can just modify the hole a bit to adapt.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...