Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Gangly said:

 

Agreed.  There is planned obsolescence in every mass produced, manufactured item.  GM is just telling you the parameters they shoot for in the design so that it will last long enough to where they don't have to cover it under warranty. :)

 

And how long is that warranty? 

5 years or 60K miles!

About how long people finance, right?

 :crackup:

Posted

You guys talk like these trucks dont last lol.  Ive seen a few with 200k+ miles on this gen's platform at work.  With how many sell, you are going to see a good amount of issues arise, and with todays world, word gets around a lot quicker than in past times so it sounds a lot worst than it realistically is.  

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Anon12345 said:

You guys talk like these trucks dont last lol.  Ive seen a few with 200k+ miles on this gen's platform at work.  With how many sell, you are going to see a good amount of issues arise, and with todays world, word gets around a lot quicker than in past times so it sounds a lot worst than it realistically is.  

 

Couldn't help myself.

 

Failures as you say are less common than successes. If not GM would be out of business, right?

 

That said failures occur and most failures are self inflicted. Not that the set up isn't already there but really?

 

If a part is going to fail because of heat treat, dimensional or design issue, that happens pretty darn quick. Last round of lifters failures happened between 500 and 5000 miles. Heat treat. Now blow out of proportion. If you have a failure past say 20K then you have a maintenance or other related issue, like lubrication. More common that you think.

 

Forum like this???? Yes...only the failures come here...NOT. And we try to let others know what has worked and what has failed in prevention. Problem is???? Yea... There is that and this ain't that. No false flags here sir.   

 

 

Posted

So, my 130 degrees range, is after an hour drive up to the Adirondack mountains, overall about 1200 feet of increase in elevation, some hills, some flat spots.  Still stays at 130.  2020 AT4, 5.3 with 10 speed.  Towing my sled trailer, on same trip, maybe 140s.  My old 2014, with the 6 speed, I could fry an egg on it, mainly because of the thermostat in it, 195-210 all day long.....

Posted

Sorry to be clueless, but how do you tell the temp of your trans?  Is that something that comes standard that I’m just not aware of, or does that only come with certain options of towing package.

Posted (edited)
On 3/23/2022 at 3:45 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Lot's of WE and ALLOW.

And how did that work out for their customers? 

 

Investor owned and driven companies such as GM are all about $$.  Engineers may set the spec's but the bean counters are required to seek out the lowest prices on parts and services.  And like almost everything made by a low bidder, short cuts are taken and lower quality additives are used to meet the low price of the bid.  

 

The goal it to make it last the warranty period, after that its the customers problem. 

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 2
Posted
16 hours ago, GN2018 said:

Sorry to be clueless, but how do you tell the temp of your trans?  Is that something that comes standard that I’m just not aware of, or does that only come with certain options of towing package.

You can check your transmission temperature by navigating through your digital screen on your instrument cluster via your steering wheels controls.  If you don't have that option, you can check your actual transmission temp gauge on your instrument cluster.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Gangly said:

You can check your transmission temperature by navigating through your digital screen on your instrument cluster via your steering wheels controls.  If you don't have that option, you can check your actual transmission temp gauge on your instrument cluster.


Thanks. Found it.  Running at about 130.

Posted

Im curious if you guys with low temps are just cruising at low rpm's. Soon as i start actually driving and keeping high rpm's my tranny temp sits around 180-215 depending and fluctuates up and down, but normal cruising it maxed 178-180. 

Posted

Its not necessarily a matter of low rpm so much as load.  Going 50 mph at 2,000 rpms is much easier on a transmission than 70 mph at 2,000 rpms due to kinetic forces, or loads, such as wind.  The load on the transmission is significantly greater at higher speeds and during periods acceleration, and internal heat builds up accordingly through friction forces applied through the  transmission's torque converter, clutches, brakes, etc .  My guess would be that most of the low temperature reads are from individuals with short duration trips or a lot of low speed, ie low load, driving.  Stay long enough on the highway at cruising speeds, and the temperatures will get to the 180-185 F range.  Put-put around town for 30 minutes and the temperature may never reach the 180 F threshold, again a matter of load, not necessarily RPM.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 3/24/2022 at 11:27 PM, GN2018 said:

Sorry to be clueless, but how do you tell the temp of your trans?  Is that something that comes standard that I’m just not aware of, or does that only come with certain options of towing package.

 

On 3/25/2022 at 3:37 PM, Gangly said:

You can check your transmission temperature by navigating through your digital screen on your instrument cluster via your steering wheels controls.  If you don't have that option, you can check your actual transmission temp gauge on your instrument cluster.

There are at least 3 methods on a the Denali.

 

if you can put it in tow/haul and the voltmeter (right hand one of the 4 gauges at top of display) switches to transmission temp. 

It can be switched in/out of tow/haul anytime for a quick temp check.

 

In the trailering app, it has a page that will display trans temperature. 

On '21's, the trailering app is standard on '21 SLT, AT4 and Denali and is available on SLE and Elevation

Edited by redwngr
Posted

I’d be curious to know if those who are in the hotter side are lifted trucks and/or with oversized tires.  I definitely had an increase after a lift and 35’s.  

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Jagerschnapps1 said:

I’d be curious to know if those who are in the hotter side are lifted trucks and/or with oversized tires.  I definitely had an increase after a lift and 35’s.  

Lifted trucks, or rather trucks with larger and heavier wheel and tire combinations, should generate more heat within the transmission resulting in shorter times to reach operating temperatures.  The increased rotational mass combined with an elevated drive height inhibits acceleration, increases wind load, and in turn will increase heat through frictional forces within the transmission as it tries to maintain the desired results of your right foot's input.

 

I personally don't mind though, its worth it :)

Edited by Gangly
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...