Jump to content
  • Sign Up

2022 ZR2 silverado dssv shock part numbers


Recommended Posts

I knew there would be an improvement in the ride coming from a '21 trail boss with the Ranchos, but I didn't expect it to be this good! They are nothing short of amazing.  A very very smooth ride, yet in corners you don't feel like the truck is going to roll over Honestly the Ranchos are horrible. I had a 2006 z71 silverado that I installed Bilstein 5100's on. They in comparison made the trail boss feel like a dump truck.  If you don't want to splurge on the dssv's the 5100's would be my 2nd choice.

Edited by Firehawk99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GETGONE said:

I'd love a set of the DSSV's if they just bolt on. I imagine the price is probably over $4K for the full set.

$4k is better than $72k 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do these actually give you a life over the Ranchos ? Or is the height difference between this and TB just shocks ?

Bad ass shocks thats for sure . And yeah i would agree probably 3-4 grand for F/R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, f8l vnm said:

Do these actually give you a life over the Ranchos ? Or is the height difference between this and TB just shocks ?

Bad ass shocks thats for sure . And yeah i would agree probably 3-4 grand for F/R

No more lift than the Trail Boss Ranchos.  Im pretty sure the ZR2 is higher because of the larger tires.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
13 hours ago, GETGONE said:

I thought UCAs were the same across the trucks. I didn't notice anything different or special about the ZR2 ones.

 

 

Starting with the refresh 2022 they aren't any more.

 

2022 refresh there are two arms.  Regular suspension and then Trail Boss/ZR2 have a new p/n arm.

 

2023 refresh there are two as well.  Regular trucks get the arms they were putting on refresh TB/ZR2 and then TB/ZR2 have another new p/n arms.  

 

Prior to ZR2 there was one set of arms for all trucks, both regular and TB trucks.  GM must have made a change for ball joint angle to correct the failure point.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    247.8k
    Total Topics
    2.6m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    336,770
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Jason Boldenow
    Newest Member
    Jason Boldenow
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 864 Guests (See full list)




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.