Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/4/2023 at 9:45 PM, luke1333 said:

Has anybody drove a DSSV truck? Is the difference night and day from a regular one?

The reviews online would make you believe they're the best thing on the market. TFL preferred them to the fox system on the new raptor. I need to go test drive a AT4X or ZR2 before buying a set of these for my AT4.

Posted

I had a 2019 AT4 and now a 2022 AT4X and they aren't even comparable. The DSSV shocks are beyond anything i have ever experienced. My wife also has a 2020 Yukon Denali with Mag ride. I thought it rode so nice compared to my 2019 AT4. Now i think it rides like crap compared to the AT4X. 
 

The best description i can think of is they take away the first 20% of the impact and the last 20% of the impact. You still feel bumps but in a much smoother and controlled way. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Here's the shocks kit in the Chevolet Performance catalog.  Requires either a factory Trail Boss/AT4 or if you have a regular truck you'd have to install the GM 2 inch lift and then add the shocks.  

 

zr2.thumb.png.3669405c6598b4952bc348232f8e9d8a.png

  • Thanks 1
Posted

What's the MSRP? I can't find anything searching that part number.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I'd say there's a bit of overstating here on the feel of a mass produced tuned shock under normal driving conditions.  Also, for less than $4500 you can get some custom tuned adjustable King or Fox shocks from Accutune, way more value there and you'll get your "bro" points! 

Edited by Traction
Posted
1 hour ago, Traction said:

I'd say there's a bit of overstating here on the feel of a mass produced tuned shock under normal driving conditions.  Also, for less than $4500 you can get some custom tuned adjustable King or Fox shocks from Accutune, way more value there and you'll get your "bro" points! 

I'd take the DSSV over King, FOX, or any Accutuned shocks any day of the week.  DSSV shocks are just getting introduced into the off road market, but within 10 years the aftermarket, high end, long travel suspension systems will be utilizing the DSSV architecture.  One of the main reasons is that a traditional, deflected-disc damper only offers two force-velocity curves for tuning while the DSSV dampers offer six tuning curves for the front, four at the rear.  No reduction in performance due to any damaged or worn out discs means much more consistency and long term durability.  The bottom line is that the design inherently provides much more tunability and durability, two factors the off road world heavily rely upon.  Two of the reasons why the new Ford Production Desert Race Bronco uses them exclusively over King, FOX, etc.  

 

Some of the current vehicles and race programs that use Multimatic DSSV shocks:

Aston Martin Vulcan

Aston Martin Vanquish

Aston Martin One 77

Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

Chevrolet and Hall Racing Colorado ZR2

Chevrolet Silverado ZR2

GMC Sierra AT4X

Ferrari 488 GT3 and GTE Variants

Ford Production Desert Race Bronco

Ford GT Mk II

Ford GT Mk IV

Ford Mustang GT 4

Ford FR500C, FR500GT3, Boss 302R, Shelby GT350R-C

Mazda RT24-P

Mercedes -AMG GT3

Porsche 911 GT3 Cup - Type 992

Multiple F1 and Formula 1 Teams

 

Multimatic DSSV shocks are simply a better shock all the way around, and are worth the sticker price for anybody who can afford it.  Unfortunately I cant afford them, but if I could then I wouldn't hesitate to turn my back on King, FOX, etc. and never look back.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, Gangly said:

I'd take the DSSV over King, FOX, or any Accutuned shocks any day of the week.  DSSV shocks are just getting introduced into the off road market, but within 10 years the aftermarket, high end, long travel suspension systems will be utilizing the DSSV architecture.  One of the main reasons is that a traditional, deflected-disc damper only offers two force-velocity curves for tuning while the DSSV dampers offer six tuning curves for the front, four at the rear.  No reduction in performance due to any damaged or worn out discs means much more consistency and long term durability.  The bottom line is that the design inherently provides much more tunability and durability, two factors the off road world heavily rely upon.  Two of the reasons why the new Ford Production Desert Race Bronco uses them exclusively over King, FOX, etc.  

 

Some of the current vehicles and race programs that use Multimatic DSSV shocks:

Aston Martin Vulcan

Aston Martin Vanquish

Aston Martin One 77

Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

Chevrolet and Hall Racing Colorado ZR2

Chevrolet Silverado ZR2

GMC Sierra AT4X

Ferrari 488 GT3 and GTE Variants

Ford Production Desert Race Bronco

Ford GT Mk II

Ford GT Mk IV

Ford Mustang GT 4

Ford FR500C, FR500GT3, Boss 302R, Shelby GT350R-C

Mazda RT24-P

Mercedes -AMG GT3

Porsche 911 GT3 Cup - Type 992

Multiple F1 and Formula 1 Teams

 

Multimatic DSSV shocks are simply a better shock all the way around, and are worth the sticker price for anybody who can afford it.  Unfortunately I cant afford them, but if I could then I wouldn't hesitate to turn my back on King, FOX, etc. and never look back.

 

While I agree with what you said about the possibilities with DSSV and that the new shiny tech is cool, it is also nearly completely motorsports focused. This is where the value proposition is lost for the common GM 1500 owner. 99.9% of the consumers don't even have the base level knowledge to understand why one shock is better than the next, nor would they ever do anything in their truck that would test that understanding. I'm willing to bet that that number also plays out similarly for the specialty trucks like the ZR2 or AT4X, which will continue to sell out. This is especially true regarding how valving/tuning contributes one way or another to performance under a given scenario. People buy what is "cool" so they can say they have it while boasting what their system "can" do hypothetically. So is an extra $1k (more than other top tier shocks) going to gain any more tangible value, especially in noticeable performance by the consumer? doubt it. but I suppose one could argue that the cool points are worth it, right?  

Edited by Traction
  • Thanks 1
Posted

This is why if you really wanted that DSSV shock system you should of just gotten the zr2 package! Because yes in my experience anyone who tries to adapt this onto their non zr2 truck in the long run, will spend more money and get less value then if they would of just stepped up to the zr2 package.

 

This just never works out, i have over 20 years now of seeing people on these website save a few bucks on the initial cost of the truck and then spend untold amounts of money to make it into a truck they could of just bought that way from factory! And 100% of the time, not 70%, 80% or 90% but 100% of the time it will cost more money in the long run, you get less value as the zr2 package offers so much more than just shocks and your at the mercy of whatever smuck is working on your truck and hope he does a proper job.

 

Moral of this story is just buy the zr2!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Traction said:

While I agree with what you said about the possibilities with DSSV and that the new shiny tech is cool, it is also nearly completely motorsports focused. This is where the value proposition is lost for the common GM 1500 owner. 99.9% of the consumers don't even have the base level knowledge to understand why one shock is better than the next, nor would they ever do anything in their truck that would test that understanding. This is especially true regarding how valving/tuning contributes one way or another to performance under a given scenario. People buy what is "cool" so they can say they have it while boasting what their system "can" do hypothetically. So is an extra $1k (more than other top tier shocks) going to gain any more tangible value, especially in noticeable performance by the consumer? doubt it. but I suppose one could argue that the cool points are worth it, right?  

Your points are valid, and 99 percent of most purchasers would never be able to maximize the potential of either shock design, but value and "worth of expenditure" are entirely determined by the consumer of said product. Personally, I could care less about "cool points" so I place no value in that and tend to look at things slightly differently.  However, for street queens and Brosefs (which take up far more of the market than any other group), talking points are just as important as capabilities and I can understand the socialization aspect of it, after all who doesn't like talking shop with like minded individuals and there is no better place to do that than at street meets.

 

🍻

Edited by Gangly
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gangly said:

Your points are valid, and 99 percent of most purchasers would never be able to maximize the potential of either shock design, but value and "worth of expenditure" are entirely determined by the consumer of said product. Personally, I could care less about "cool points" so I place no value in that and tend to look at things slightly differently.  However, for street queens and Brosefs (which take up far more of the market than any other group), talking points are just as important as capabilities and I can understand the socialization aspect of it, after all who doesn't like talking shop with like minded individuals and there is no better place to do that than at street meets.

 

🍻

I can agree, here!

Posted
31 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

This is why if you really wanted that DSSV shock system you should of just gotten the zr2 package! Because yes in my experience anyone who tries to adapt this onto their non zr2 truck in the long run, will spend more money and get less value then if they would of just stepped up to the zr2 package.

 

This just never works out, i have over 20 years now of seeing people on these website save a few bucks on the initial cost of the truck and then spend untold amounts of money to make it into a truck they could of just bought that way from factory! And 100% of the time, not 70%, 80% or 90% but 100% of the time it will cost more money in the long run, you get less value as the zr2 package offers so much more than just shocks and your at the mercy of whatever smuck is working on your truck and hope he does a proper job.

 

Moral of this story is just buy the zr2!

150%

Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

This is why if you really wanted that DSSV shock system you should of just gotten the zr2 package! Because yes in my experience anyone who tries to adapt this onto their non zr2 truck in the long run, will spend more money and get less value then if they would of just stepped up to the zr2 package.

 

This just never works out, i have over 20 years now of seeing people on these website save a few bucks on the initial cost of the truck and then spend untold amounts of money to make it into a truck they could of just bought that way from factory! And 100% of the time, not 70%, 80% or 90% but 100% of the time it will cost more money in the long run, you get less value as the zr2 package offers so much more than just shocks and your at the mercy of whatever smuck is working on your truck and hope he does a proper job.

 

Moral of this story is just buy the zr2!

 

 

But if you have a factory Custom Trail Boss, you can toss the ZR2 kit from GM on there and still have a cheaper ZR2.  Base price (with destination) of a ZR2 is $73,345.  A Custom Trail Boss is $53,695 for the 2.7 HO, $55,440 for the 5.3 and $56,235 for the 3.0 Duramax.  

 

Add the shocks and install and you are what, 10-15K cheaper?  The only thing at that point that makes the ZR2 worth it is the E lockers.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, BIGDOGx said:

This is why if you really wanted that DSSV shock system you should of just gotten the zr2 package! Because yes in my experience anyone who tries to adapt this onto their non zr2 truck in the long run, will spend more money and get less value then if they would of just stepped up to the zr2 package.

 

 

I respect your opinion, but I disagree with it.

 

I purchased my 2020 LT Z71 new for $39,600 a few months into the Covid lockdown.  The ONLY thing I really want from the ZR2 is the suspension, and since I can purchase and install it for under 5K as a direct bolt on along with the addition  of TB CV's, I would be WAAAAY ahead financially by not purchasing a new ZR2/AT4X.  

 

For less than $45k, I would have a truck with identical road handling capabilities to the ZR2 (minus a front locker), for $25K-$30K less than a ZR2. 

 

Fortunately, my Eibach Pro Truck system still feels like new after having been on the truck for the past 66k miles(truck has 86K miles), and I have a spare set of new Eibach shocks waiting for when the fronts do eventually wear out.  

 

Now if you want to start talking about engine and drivetrain modifications, you are 100% right.  You dont by a 5.3 and spend 15k to make it feel like a 6.2....just get the 6.2

Edited by Gangly
  • Like 2
Posted

So I just checked GMC's accessory page, and when I set the vehicle to my 2020 AT4, the shock package doesn't show up.  Only for the updated body style 23's.  Any thoughts?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No ETA is available for that engine at the moment in the GM system.   I would start at the dealer.  Try and talk to the parts manager or service manager and see if they can start a CX Connect case and get an ETA from GM on when engines may be available.  If they just check Parts Workbench and say "no eta", they aren't trying hard enough.  They need to do a CX Connect and chat with DPAC to find the ETA.      
    • I would have to read back to get a better picture in my mind of some of the other comments and what they were using for a driving scenario they based the fuel mileage off of. That is why the fuel mileage conversation is extremely difficult to make fair comparisons from. If I was to be living in town and only driving around town, light to light and some longer stretches that doesn't have a light every block, and the usual stop at a grocery store and the bank and so on and so forth, my fuel mileage even during the summer time would be so bad with my truck I don't even want to know how bad it would be !. Then add in winter time and idling to warm it up to clear the windows and driving through snowy streets etc, large heavy trucks with gas engines have NEVER been worth crap for fuel mileage and why some little pot licker of a car with wheelbarrow tires and a 1300 cc four cylinder non turbo engine was the ticket to using a mere fraction of the fuel over a full size pickup.    By the way my truck has the 34" tires as its a HC but not the BFG KO3 tires ( that was an option for my truck but the sales guy couldn't figure out what the tires actually were so that never got on the order until it was too late to change the truck order ). So what fuel mileage your getting actually sounds good for "town driving" and with my truck when I go to town the fuel mileage keeps increasing as I get closer to town because it takes quite a while to get the driveline oils warmed up ( and why it always shows better fuel mileage on the return trip from town because its already warmed up ) but once I am in town that fuel mileage average just keeps dropping the more I mess around town and then has to recover back to something reasonable again by the time I get home for an over all average.    I'd be curious what your sticker says for the factory weight of your truck, mine is close around that 7700 lb due to the options it has. But anyway the long and short is, vehicle weight, higher rolling resistance heavy tires and a hefty driveline and a relatively large gas engine make for crap fuel mileage in stop and go scenarios, all one can do is drive it easy off the line at each stop and as my dad had said over the years, drive like a raw egg is under your foot and that's the best one can do. Years back with a carbed engine and if the carb was getting a bit out of tune etc as would the ignition system, the fuel mileage on pickups with larger engines was just awful compared to what your getting. We pay the fuel price penalty for driving HD trucks over some little vehicle, that is the reality. 
    • We had two Toyota’s with that engine in the mid 80s. We had 50 gallon fuel tanks, a toolbox full of tools, an air compressor and assorted parts for our equipment. We beat those up and down pipeline ROWs until we started buying diesel trucks. Then they became parts runners and first vehicles for our teenagers first cars. Our shop Forman wrecked them both two years apart when we hired him out of high school as an apprentice. Good thing he’s an excellent mechanic. It took awhile before he could be called a good driver.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...