Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok Farmers, I have a question for you. 
 

do they transport liquid manure by semi in a tank similar to a gasoline tanker?

 

reason I ask, I was at a light and a semi rolled up next to me and when he lurched forward I saw a bunch of brownish greenish liquid spray out the top of this tank. I just knew some had to have went on my truck. 
 

sure enough I got sprayed on the passenger side and hood with this shat. 
 

mat firet I had no idea until I smelled it. Yeah it smelled like literal crap. 
 

Immediatly went home to wash it. 

  • Sad 2
Posted

That sucks.  Last year I was on the highway in a rental (thank goodness) when I was getting a continual mist coming at me.  Came to see it was the hose on the back of the honey wagon.  First time ever I spent money getting a rental washed.

  • Like 1
Posted

That’s how they haul liquid manure. Should have chased him down. That is unacceptable on his part. He can get in big trouble for that. 45 years ago a friend of mine was hauling milk. His tanker was only half full. When he took of the milk shifted with such force that it blew the top open with a geyser of milk that doused the car behind him. He gave the guy $25 for a car wash.

Posted
31 minutes ago, rdonarski said:

That’s how they haul liquid manure. Should have chased him down. That is unacceptable on his part. He can get in big trouble for that. 45 years ago a friend of mine was hauling milk. His tanker was only half full. When he took of the milk shifted with such force that it blew the top open with a geyser of milk that doused the car behind him. He gave the guy $25 for a car wash.

Yeah I thought about it but was already in the turn lane and he was on his way down the road. The top seemed to be open at the middle like a latch was loose it was messy up top. 

Posted

Ewwww, I hope you doused yourself and your truck down with alcohol or something that isn't labeled bud light...  😂

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Another JR said:

New truck time?

Yeah I pulled right into the Ford dealer and all the new 23 SD trucks had been covered in crap too, then I realized that’s just how they look haha

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

Ewwww, I hope you doused yourself and your truck down with alcohol or something that isn't labeled bud light...  😂

yeah washed it right away. All clean again. 
I used bud light to wash the crap off. It identifies as maguires car soap haha

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 64BAwagon said:

Did the load happen to say "U.S. Government" on it and was it heading towards DC ?  

Indeed it did, the license plate said 46-FJB

  • Haha 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...