Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

so I live in the snowy/salty side of town in the winter, I see plenty of rusted out trucks. it saddens me. So my 22 2500 HD I went with aftermarket undercoating through the dealer. a year later i'm under the truck, notice the undercoating stops at the rear wheel wells. figured i'd start at the dealership. 

they told me GM puts some wax undercoating at the rear wheel wells and aftermarket undercoat wouldn't stick to the GM applied undercoat. I asked how long has GM been doing that, she said forever. 

So we have a known non working process that stops my additional $ from solving my concern!

please explain if you understand.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hoginedgewood said:

so I live in the snowy/salty side of town in the winter, I see plenty of rusted out trucks. it saddens me. So my 22 2500 HD I went with aftermarket undercoating through the dealer. a year later i'm under the truck, notice the undercoating stops at the rear wheel wells. figured i'd start at the dealership. 

they told me GM puts some wax undercoating at the rear wheel wells and aftermarket undercoat wouldn't stick to the GM applied undercoat. I asked how long has GM been doing that, she said forever. 

So we have a known non working process that stops my additional $ from solving my concern!

please explain if you understand.

Only thing that's undercoated is the frame with the heavy wax coating the axles are a paint type undercoating and yes, he is right aftermarket undercoating won't stick to the part that's undercoated. Anything that's part of the under body bad cab etc is paint.

Edited by Silverado4x4
Posted

The wheel wells are not undercoated from the factory. Just plain body color paint. 
fluid film sticks to the factory wax, and contrary to what a couple have said, doesn’t remove the factory wax. 
 

I didn’t coat the whole frame but I did test a few spots and it doesn’t phase the wax. 
 

I used Fluid film on most other areas under my truck. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

No need for it down here but my northern customers like using AMSOIL's Heavy-Duty Metal Protector.  It doesn't effect the factory wax coating.  It's my understanding 6 cans will undercoat a 1500.

Most down here use it on their boat trailers since they are in salt water.  Keeps the springs in great shape.

 

https://www.amsoil.com/p/heavy-duty-metal-protector-amhsc/?zo=521390

 

image.thumb.jpeg.bf83d5882e22c5b717502e57f01745b2.jpeg

Edited by Black02Silverado
Posted

From Minnesota and I got my 2023 High Country undercoated........everything here is coated white in the Winter and it's not snow!

They coated everything underneath and yes it does stick to the factory "wax" coating just fine. 

 

The added benefit I never thought about.......it helps a lot with sound deadening!

  • Like 1
Posted

Posted about this previously, so the short version.

After paying for the undercoat “special” from the dealer, I did some research and found issues with the product. Went back to the dealer to cancel the product and got into a long discussion during which the dealer did not want to cancel, after which the rep finally agreed to contact the GM rep, who replied that GM does not recommend any after factory coating even that applied by the dealer and advise it likely will make rusting worse. Upon receipt of this email, the dealer cancelled the order.

Posted

I undercoated my last truck and will do the one I have now mostly because I have little faith in the GM coating on the frame, every used truck I looked at that had been through a winter had lots of rust on the frame and the  GM coating was pretty much gone. It rubs off anywhere it gets touched and even car washes removes it too easily leaving bare metal exposed.

Posted

The rubberized stuff like Zebart? Never again.... Eric O from south main has a pretty good video on why. I agree with everything he says here since i have experienced it myself. Had a truck done this way and within 5 years the frame was coming apart and the truck was junk. Been using fluid film ever since and had no issues. If i still lived in the salt belt the fluid film place would have been the first stop for my 2024. I will have it done next time i'm in the north east with the truck but for now here in Florida i should not need it... I will spot spray any places that the wax has moved or come off.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I used Line-X Premium in the rear wheel housings and a lanoline-based coating when and where needed. And she never sees the salt even though I live in that area. I have cheaper rides to sacrifice to the elements. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Now on my  4th. GMC.  First new 2013 3500HD, saw the frame wax coating peeling off after a year. Saw another '13 at my dealer, bed removed, and cab on two post lift high in the air. Asked Bill the service manager as this was also a Duramax, what's up with that truck ??  Said re-coating the frame.  What ??   Thats when I got under mine and saw the black wax, still very sticky, peeling off in sheets.

Asked is this a recall ??  Bill said a "silent one". GM will pay for, ONLY if the owner complains !!!!

Woolwax ( same company as Fluid Film ) told me, this is still an ongoing GM truck problem. The frames are wax dipped as raw oily steel, and the wax will not stick. Frames should be chemically dipped first in an oil cleansing bath, that phosphate metal etch preps the steel, Before the wax dip, so it will adhere.

I just Woolwaxed my '24, all sheetmetal , wheel wells with liners removed, rockers, and  door cavities. Woolwax says wait two years for the GM frame wax to peel, then use their process on the frame areas then. It will not mess up the Gm fame wax chemically, as it is pure Lanolin, but just a waste of product and $$ on top of the GM frame wax , to do to early, only to peel off with the GM wax.

As I understand it, the Lanolin based products, will creep into seams, is chemically inert to not cause paint damage or to wiring.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 8/5/2023 at 5:35 PM, Silverado4x4 said:

Only thing that's undercoated is the frame with the heavy wax coating the axles are a paint type undercoating and yes, he is right aftermarket undercoating won't stick to the part that's undercoated. Anything that's part of the under body bad cab etc is paint.

I posted this in a few areas. The GM frames are dipped in the black wax, on bare un-cleaned , oily steel, from the stamping process.

As the steel was not cleaned before dipping in wax, it will not adhere well. Over time starts peeling off.

Even my new 2013 3599HD  and 2016 2500HD, the wax that was peeling off, stuck to my fingers and under fingernails. Hard to get off, still sticky as heck. Wax GM uses is not the problem, it's the lack of metal surface prep to help it stick.

GM and other mfg's. state the extensive sheetmetal paint process, requires "No Further Preventative Measures". So the Marketing Says.  Horse Pies.  I see every brand of truck in the North East with extensive sheepmetal corrosion, as Salt, Calcium Cloride is used on the roads.

Any lanolin based rust proof product is cheap insurance. Spray the heck out of your vehicles.

FYI: Woolwax just released a new Lanolin product called "Creep & Crawl".  Just tried it on my NOS '61-'71 Dodge rocker panel, still on the shelf. Put a little in the bottom spot weld pinch seam area, After a day, it was migrating upward, against gravity. Going to use it on all my vintage vehicles after seeing this.

 

KP.

  • Like 1
Posted

mine never see's salt but i did the entire frame/ floor pans/inner wheel whell's and everything under the bed in duplicolor spray in bed liner. it stuck to the factory frame coating (or should i say on top of) really well. ill most likely do the fluid film inside the rockers next. i think an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure in situations like this. or maybe peace of mind that you at  least tried to prevent it....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...