Jump to content

I'm so confused....I don't want to let my beloved gasser go....

Jettech1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jettech1 Senior Enthusiast

Jettech1

Posted
Posted (edited)

We are looking at buying a 15k fully loaded 5th wheel.  It of course falls into specs of what my 22 gasser will tow and payload rated.  But will it?  That's the very expensive to me question I've been asking myself since we decided on buying the Grand Design 2903RL  I know it falls into specs of what my gasser is rated for but should I?  Will it be ok with that kind of weight without dogging it too much or should I just send up the red flag and say screw it?  Buy a damn diesel and get it over with?  The thing that bothers me so much is that my gasser has been amazing from day 1.  It's friggen perfect to me, I absolutely LOVE it.  But....and I say But....I don't "think" it will tow that much weight all over the US with ease....if any of you are towing a 5th wheel with a gasser that weighs that much, with the 6 speed trans, please comment....I would like to hear what you all think.

Edited by Jettech1
  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

dal1980
dal1980

You can second guess until your blue in the face...at the end of the day you already own the truck.  Hook up and go, see what you find out.  It's not like you bought the trailer without a truck and ha

MrChips
MrChips

I have a 2022 GMC AT4 2500HD with the 6.6 gasser/6 speed tranny combo and pull a 5th wheel camper similar in size to the new one you're considering. This is our 4th fifth wheel camper and my 5th 2500H

Grumpy Bear
Grumpy Bear

What is that logo on a dollar bill? The one person that can be trusted is ignored or denied. Just say'n.   

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

Can't speak on towing experience with a 5th wheel camper, but I'm going to say that shopping by GVWR of the trailer is always important.

 

Looks like that model camper is GVWR of 15,000lbs and base curb weight is 11,800lbs.  Hitch weight is 2190lbs.

 

Gross combined for your truck should be 24000lbs, towing with 5th or goose 16650lbs.  You'd be within the rated limits of your truck.  Will it pull it?  Yes.  Would a diesel maybe have a better time doing it?  Probably, if you gotta win a race sure.  

 

Would a 2024 6.6 gas with the 10 speed do it better than the 6 speed?  Most likely.  They are rated to tow more too.  Crew gas 4x4 is 18400lbs for 5th/goose.  

 

 

 

  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jettech1 said:

We are looking at buying a 15k fully loaded 5th wheel.  It of course falls into specs of what my 22 gasser will tow and payload rated.  But will it?  That's the very expensive to me question I've been asking myself since we decided on buying the Grand Design 2903RL  I know it falls into specs of what my gasser is rated for but should I?  Will it be ok with that kind of weight without dogging it too much or should I just send up the red flag and say screw it?  Buy a damn diesel and get it over with?  The thing that bothers me so much is that my gasser has been amazing from day 1.  It's friggen perfect to me, I absolutely LOVE it.  But....and I say But....I don't "think" it will tow that much weight all over the US with ease....if any of you are towing a 5th wheel with a gasser that weighs that much, with the 6 speed trans, please comment....I would like to hear what you all think.

You want a diesel, you want a diesel 🤪

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
ManyCamaroz Enthusiast

ManyCamaroz

Posted
Posted

An old timer told me once that that the GVWR is determined by how much it can handle safely (stop), and not determined what it can pull. 

  • Like 1
Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted

I'd put a Whipple or Harrop on it before I played the emissions problems in the middle of nowhere game of a diesel. Will come out ahead too with the prices of new trucks these days.

  • Like 2
MrChips Enthusiast

MrChips

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a 2022 GMC AT4 2500HD with the 6.6 gasser/6 speed tranny combo and pull a 5th wheel camper similar in size to the new one you're considering. This is our 4th fifth wheel camper and my 5th 2500HD so it's not my first rodeo. The other 4 trucks had Duramax diesels which I absolutely loved and I had no issues with any of them. To me when towing a camper like that weight really isn't as much of a factor as wind drag, the 6.6 gasser pulls my camper fine when the wind isn't blowing but on a windy day it's not much fun, don't get me wrong as it gets the job done but it works the gasser pretty hard. With my Duramax trucks I can't ever recall a time where I felt like the truck was out of power or that it was being worked hard, the power and torque the Duramax produces is so impressive and really shines when towing on windy days.

 

I bought this 6.6 gas truck mainly because I liked the idea of saving the $10k versus buying the diesel and I wanted to give it a try but I will for certain be getting a Duramax for my next truck as I miss the power. Not putting the 6.6 gasser down at all as it does what I ask it to do and it's a huge improvement over the old 6.0 but when it comes to raw power there's no comparison. 

 

I have no doubt that your current truck will pull the new trailer just fine and honestly I don't think it will ever fail to get you where you're going. It sounds like you really enjoy your current truck so if I were you I would try pulling the new camper on some trips and see what you think before you go out and drop the cash to replace it. One more bit of advise, don't test drive a Duramax unless your prepared to buy it...

Edited by MrChips
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

Jettech - How often do you expect to tow that big trailer, and over what distances and type of terrain?

64BAwagon Senior Enthusiast

64BAwagon

Posted
Posted (edited)

I believe you know my story on our 5th wheel. A 337RLS pulled by (second one) 3500 Gasser. I have at least 10k miles towing this trailer with the 2 trucks, one a 6 spd and one a 10 spd. 

The unit your looking at is very close to the specs on mine. The 337 is known to be a pin heavy unit. I cant speak for the one your looking at. I do know that after running the cargo numbers many many times, I came to a 3500 because I felt that a 2500 would be over the cargo capacity. It was fine in all other categories but not in cargo. We typically carry our generator (4500w Champion inverter gen) some firewood, extra gasoline, cribbing, a spare 20# propane cylinder and my 6 ft fiberglass ladder. our 337 also has a Splendide combo washer/dryer in the front closet. I weighed the rig in December loaded for a trip with no water on board and it scaled at just under 13k with all of this cargo and trailer combined. 

I dont have any issues pulling this setup with the gasser. You do however have to actually drive this truck when towing heavy. There are times when the cruise can be used but its about 20% and you have to be on flat terrain with minimal headwind. Otherwise you need to control the throttle or you will end up shifting too often. I have driven a lot of trucks in my day. Many of them were underpowered and some were not maintained and had poor brakes. 

For me the cost and complexity of the diesel doesnt outweigh the extra work driving this setup. 

This truck has not been farther West than Nebraska, if we were planning on traveling out west frequently I would have to reconsider the diesel. My decision was made based on my circumstances and my history of driving and some inside baseball on the current GM truck issue. 

You have a lot to consider.  Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. 

 

Scott

 

On edit. I dont think the 6 spd suffers in comparison to the 10 spd. When towing I locked out 6th gear on my first truck and now lock out 9 and 10 on the new one. I didnt see much advantage to the 10 spd other than a small one in acceleration when loaded. 

Edited by 64BAwagon
  • Like 3
Jettech1 Senior Enthusiast

Jettech1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, Another JR said:

Jettech - How often do you expect to tow that big trailer, and over what distances and type of terrain?

In a few years we will be going full time in it.  We want to spend our summers in Maine where we both are from and winters around the Hollywood/Ft. Lauderdale area.  In between I'm sure trips out west and all over.  So If I had to guess, probably 10k plus a year.

asilverblazer Senior Enthusiast

asilverblazer

Posted
Posted

To me it comes down to exactly one thing... how much do you like hearing a gas engine rev for hours on end?

 

I went from a 1/2 ton 5.3 to a 1 ton diesel, the 1 ton feels a little more secure towing our travel trailer but the ride is punishing so that was a wash. Fuel mileage is the same towing, though unloaded I can get slightly better mpgs out of the 1 ton (until it does a regen). 

 

Practically speaking the gas engine would be fine, but in the back of your mind the the diesel will be calling out.

  • Like 1
kf9yr Enthusiast

kf9yr

Posted
Posted

Well I would keep an eye on the lot of my favorite dealer in case a 3500 SRW Duramax with all the features you want becomes available.

 

But... if you don't see anything that is a great deal or has every feature you want wait until you get the 5th wheel, tow it behind your current rig and see how you feel.

 

Make sure to hook it up on windy days, take it up a few hills (I do see you're in Texas so no big climbs nearby but plenty of wind!) and make up your mind.

 

It's good that you have the gas truck first so you don't have to guess how well it will pull the trailer. 

 

You may also want to do some mileage checks to see how far a tank of gas will take you pulling the new trailer. 

 

You will get farther with the diesel if you go places where range between stops is an issue like boondock camping.

  • Like 2
dal1980 Enthusiast

dal1980

Posted
Posted

You can second guess until your blue in the face...at the end of the day you already own the truck.  Hook up and go, see what you find out.  It's not like you bought the trailer without a truck and have to make a decision on gas vs diesel.  You have the perfect situation on your hands.  Your current truck is safely capable, is it comfortable?  That's the question...only you can answer that, not us knuckleheads on the internet.

  • Like 7
64BAwagon Senior Enthusiast

64BAwagon

Posted
Posted (edited)

Whats the cargo capacity listed on the door sticker on your current truck ? 

 

The pin weight on my trailer is somewhere in the area of 2750 #. I figure the unladen weight of my trailer with my wife and I and a full tank (36 gal) of fuel, whereas the cargo capacity takes those numbers and adds them to the cargo weight. All in figuring pin weight, cargo, my fat ass, my wifes delicate self and a FULL tank of gas we are at least 3400#

 

Edit, plus a 55# insane Boxer 

Edited by 64BAwagon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...