Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Atlas said:


No, it isn’t. Insurance companies are only getting richer under this grifting. Try again.

So much for being informed. What’s laughable with your statement is that there hasn’t been any changes yet. 

Edited by KARNUT
Posted
5 hours ago, KARNUT said:
5 hours ago, Atlas said:

That is exactly what the current administration is trying to resolve.

More smoke and mirrors BS. 

Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

So much for being informed. What’s laughable with your statement is that there hasn’t been any changes yet. 

For clarification you may want to look up what the temporary Covid enhancement is. That set to expire. Basically it gives subsidies to middle and high earners. For instance a family of four making over 120K. A single person making over 60K. If you have a beef with Obama Care. Your beef isn’t with the current administration. The fact they’re even trying to fix the old administration mess is a surprise to me. To help the less fortunate to  keep it the current way with an extension doesn’t do that. I like to see a policy for catastrophic illnesses and a savings account for normal visits and procedures. Allowing a person to shop around for General Practitioners care. Competition would lower prices instead of insurance companies setting prices. It may be a utopian pipe dream. The current situation isn’t the answer. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Basically it gives subsidies to middle and high earners.

Partially true.  So that everyone is on the same page, this is what Google says:

The term "temporary Covid enhancement" most likely refers to the enhanced premium tax credits for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), originally enacted as a temporary measure in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. These enhancements were later extended through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and are scheduled to expire on December 31, 2025. 
 
Key Details of the Enhanced Tax Credits
  • Expanded Eligibility: The enhancements eliminated the income cap of 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL), allowing households with higher incomes to qualify for subsidies if their health insurance premiums exceeded 8.5% of their income.
  • Increased Subsidy Amounts: The amount of financial assistance was increased for all eligible income levels, significantly lowering the maximum percentage of household income that individuals and families had to contribute toward their premiums.
  • Zero Premiums for Some: Individuals with incomes below 150% of the FPL became eligible for plans with little to no premiums for a benchmark silver-level plan. 

The enhanced tax credits are set to expire at the end of 2025, which would cause premiums for the approximately 22 million people currently receiving the credits to more than double on average. 

 

The current administration is against ACA, but they can't come up with a replacement beyond having a concept of a plan.  Trump has had since 2016 to come up with a replacement health plan.  I guess he's too busy grifting and golfing to come up with anything more than a concept.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, PhilB said:

The current administration is against ACA, but they can't come up with a replacement beyond having a concept of a plan.  Trump has had since 2016 to come up with a replacement health plan.  I guess he's too busy grifting and golfing to come up with anything more than a concept.   

Spot on Phil.  I wish they did give a ****** about the average American.  With Christmas break upon Congress the chance of passing anything that helps is slim to nil.  

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, KARNUT said:

So much for being informed. What’s laughable with your statement is that there hasn’t been any changes yet. 


That’s a false statement. Healthcare providers and hospitals have been measurably impacted by tariffs and all the illegally held/canceled and delayed funds for various funded programs including cancer research and other grants. 
 

Rural hospitals are already closing at an alarming rate because health systems have to plan for the coming changes in reimbursement and uncertainties. Health systems have already laid off staff in anticipation of budget shortages in 2026 as well as the impact to reimbursement. Read: droves of uninsured people showing up and needing care, with no/little ability to repay.

 

But, go on, since you know so much about this, please.

Edited by Atlas
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

But, go on, since you know so much about this, please.

Please don't go on.  I appreciate that the politics of healthcare is a topic for discussion and/or debate but not here...please. Yesterday I was on the phone with my 102 year old Aunt for an hour.  She is remarkably aware and informed.  There is no extraordinary things she has done to live so long.  There is no obvious reason why I couldn't live another 30 years!  I doubt that I will but it is possible.  My Aunt knows she doesn't have much longer to live but currently has no critical health threat except the number of candles on her birthday cake.  

  • Sad 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Donstar said:

Please don't go on.  I appreciate that the politics of healthcare is a topic for discussion and/or debate but not here...please. Yesterday I was on the phone with my 102 year old Aunt for an hour.  She is remarkably aware and informed.  There is no extraordinary things she has done to live so long.  There is no obvious reason why I couldn't live another 30 years!  I doubt that I will but it is possible.  My Aunt knows she doesn't have much longer to live but currently has no critical health threat except the number of candles on her birthday cake.  

Tomorrow is my birthday. I change decades. I live a charmed life I created with hard work and self reliance. No hand outs just hard work. Last night we had our annual Mother, brother’s, sister with spouses dinner. We all created a happy complete family and business. A yearly celebration with lots of reminiscing. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Donstar said:

Please don't go on.  I appreciate that the politics of healthcare is a topic for discussion and/or debate but not here...please. Yesterday I was on the phone with my 102 year old Aunt for an hour.  She is remarkably aware and informed.  There is no extraordinary things she has done to live so long.  There is no obvious reason why I couldn't live another 30 years!  I doubt that I will but it is possible.  My Aunt knows she doesn't have much longer to live but currently has no critical health threat except the number of candles on her birthday cake.  

Ok, you've heard from the OP. It's his thread, he wants the current debate halted and get more back on topic. Please abide his wishes

Edited by txab
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Donstar said:

Please don't go on.  I appreciate that the politics of healthcare is a topic for discussion and/or debate but not here...please. Yesterday I was on the phone with my 102 year old Aunt for an hour.  She is remarkably aware and informed.  There is no extraordinary things she has done to live so long.  There is no obvious reason why I couldn't live another 30 years!  I doubt that I will but it is possible.  My Aunt knows she doesn't have much longer to live but currently has no critical health threat except the number of candles on her birthday cake.  

 

We have one of those aunts in our family too (my mom's). She's 96, still a spitfire...and will likely outlive us all. Remarkably, she's still living mostly independently in a multi-level, single-family home. She has help a few days per week. If there's a role-model for aging, she's probably a good candidate.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I live a charmed life I created with hard work and self reliance.

Right. Roads you drive on you built, you police your own town and area. You built and designed  the heavy equipment you profited from. 
You are so healthy and prescient you  self treat and taught the doctors who are required to enable the rest of us weaklings to survive. 
 

You are THE SELF MADE MAGA MAN. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, customboss said:

Right. Roads you drive on you built, you police your own town and area. You built and designed  the heavy equipment you profited from. 
You are so healthy and prescient you  self treat and taught the doctors who are required to enable the rest of us weaklings to survive. 
 

You are THE SELF MADE MAGA MAN. 

Nasty,Nasty man. Pretty soon only new subscribers will respond to you nasty man. This is my last with you. I’ve said it before, this will stick. As far as roads and the like. I’ve paid my taxes and give to charity. By nasty man. 

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Most of us as we age get somewhat wiser. Problem is we have many entitled malignant narcissists post on this site. The real problem is IGNORANT MALIGNANT NARCISSISTS. See above. ☝️ If shoe fits. 
Im just a simple disabled veteran. 

Posted

So who's had a colonoscopy lately?

 

Any knee surgeries? Anyone switching Medicare plans for the new year?

 

Back to the regularly scheduled programming...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm sure if you went to a junkyard where you go in and pull the part off the truck yourself, not a used part place where they do it for you, you can get that part on it's own.  Depending on if and what else you would be buying, and time of day, they might even just skip over adding it as a item to the bill.
    • No, we trade them like pokeman cards.
    • It would be sold as a "kit", lights + auth/programming code.   You can resell the code to someone else, if they just buy the lights, either new or used, and they can then use the code to get them to work on their truck.
    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...