Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/19/2024 at 12:20 AM, TrailBossMike said:

-With low sulphur gasoline available everywhere, TBN and TBN retention is no longer a relevant value.  Don't believe me?  Read the Chevron paper on TAN and TBN.

 

This one is a headshaker. I worked for Chevron Research. Read the paper. This isn't based on anything but a desire for less waste oil. Like viscosity reduction which promoted CAFE improvement while SACRIFICTING wear protection the same is true in this case. This has been studied to death and THERE IS a correlation and underpinning causation to the crossover point and increased wear. I'm not posting that research again. 

 

On 6/19/2024 at 12:20 AM, TrailBossMike said:

Better base oils produce less contamination due to less oxidation and thermal degradation, this required less dispersants and detergents (DI additives).

 

Base oil doesn't produce contamination. Combustion byproducts do. 🤨 Really?

 

But agreed, they do tend to take longer to oxidize 'all things equal'. Problem is all things are not equal. Base oil improvement INCREASED the oxidation ONSET temperature. What did the OEM's do with that advancement? Raised bulk oil and cylinder wall temperatures. Lowered ring tension. Increased blowby. Reduced CCV vent effectiveness over the life of the vehicle, orifice instead of a check valve which is not a compensative device. Increased OCI lengths. Reduced warranty miles. Lowered wear protection callouts in oil licensing. I take it you can't read tea leaves. :crackup:Not required. Common sense is. 

 

Guy hanging by a rope as a window washer. Doc says to the guy, "If you don't lose a few pounds you will fall to your death". So, the Doc gives him a bigger rope.

 

What does this fellow do? Put on weight.

 :idiot:

 

Guy hanging by a rope as a window washer. Doc says to the guy, "If you don't lose a few pounds you will fall to your death". So, the window washer takes his advice and loses some weight.

 

Then he buys a thinner rope to hang from.

 :idiot:

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah. I know there are inferior parts all over today. Not just oem`s. Lifters being on top of the list. But, I`m wondering if the combo of the 0w20 oil, the hotter climates, and the stop/start is causing lifter failures. As in lack of lube, like the hemi, with it`s high location and almost horizontal lifter bores. They have cam and lifter failures just as bad or worse than these GM engines. I`m also hearing of these lifter problems with the AFM/DFM disabled. So...

Posted
1 hour ago, PunchT37 said:

Yeah. I know there are inferior parts all over today. Not just oem`s. Lifters being on top of the list. But, I`m wondering if the combo of the 0w20 oil, the hotter climates, and the stop/start is causing lifter failures. As in lack of lube, like the hemi, with it`s high location and almost horizontal lifter bores. They have cam and lifter failures just as bad or worse than these GM engines. I`m also hearing of these lifter problems with the AFM/DFM disabled. So...

 

Likely all are true. Thing is, once you know you have to figure a solution. Some of us do and the OEMs are getting wise to this as well. Rumor has it that the 2025 models will no longer have a switch to defeat the auto-stop/start. They continue to elevate their encryption. They have already complicated the cooling and oiling systems or limited the available parts to cure the elevated heat. And there are fewer and fewer choices of oils on the shelves. One might think they are trying to squeeze us out of the ICE market and into electric. 🤨  

 

GM V8's as we knew them....yea.....

 

When they started using variable displacement vane pumps not only did they remove some parasitic horsepower draw, which was a good thing, but they also inadvertently (or not) LOWERED THE COOLING CAPCITY of the motor. 😱 One of oils many functions is cooling. Lower gearing and deep overdrives lowered the water pump speeds. 

 

Hot oil is thinner oil. Then we spec a *W20, a thinner oil. Increase cooling system temperature. Add preheaters, zone cooling...do everything possible to increase operating temperature, remove lubrication and thin what lubrication there is. THEN add stop start and hybrid systems to shut off the cooling and oil supply completely. As an added bonus remove the chemistry from the oil that fights all these issues which was necessary due to lower tension rings not sealing as well for as long. (They would seal fine with better bore and ring land prep $$$) Wait, doing all of this created the issues they are trying to solve and then removing the solution? They seem amazed there are lubrication related failures.  :idiot: 

 

If you know the issues, you have a solution. More cooling and more viscosity in oils that are more shear stable and more heat tolerant. The API SP ultra-thin oils they are calling out are the not cutting the mustard. Bottom rung on the ladder. Picture pig crap on the bottom of your shoe. That is how much elevation above the bottom rung you get with a Dexos1Gen2 oil. Not even a full rung.

 

IF you insist on a 0W20 then look for a Dexos1Gen3, Porsche C20 CERTIFIEND oil. The Gen3 spec has a minimum HTHS of 2.9, same as an SAE *W30. The Porsche certification gets you MUCH better deposit control in a MID SAPS oil with more effective AW packages. 

 

Or be proactive. Use not just a *W30 but one with a ACEA C3 DEXOS2 certification minimum. Raises the HTHS to 3.5 and still a MID SAPS oil with better deposit control. (Mobil 1 ESP is a DEXOS2 certified oil as is Castrol 5W30 C3)   

 

dexos®2 | GM (gmdexos.com)

 

Cut OEM OLM in HALF minimum. 

 

As long as they have an oil filter you have access to an oil cooler HINT-HINT heavy haulers.

 

IMHO of course and these are only suggestions, not Gospel.  

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

You spend $50,000 to $100,000 on a truck just to have it belong to the manufacturer. 
 

My bad, I mean the government. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 6/25/2024 at 10:31 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Likely all are true. Thing is, once you know you have to figure a solution. Some of us do and the OEMs are getting wise to this as well. Rumor has it that the 2025 models will no longer have a switch to defeat the auto-stop/start. They continue to elevate their encryption. They have already complicated the cooling and oiling systems or limited the available parts to cure the elevated heat. And there are fewer and fewer choices of oils on the shelves. One might think they are trying to squeeze us out of the ICE market and into electric. 🤨  

 

GM V8's as we knew them....yea.....

 

When they started using variable displacement vane pumps not only did they remove some parasitic horsepower draw, which was a good thing, but they also inadvertently (or not) LOWERED THE COOLING CAPCITY of the motor. 😱 One of oils many functions is cooling. Lower gearing and deep overdrives lowered the water pump speeds. 

 

Hot oil is thinner oil. Then we spec a *W20, a thinner oil. Increase cooling system temperature. Add preheaters, zone cooling...do everything possible to increase operating temperature, remove lubrication and thin what lubrication there is. THEN add stop start and hybrid systems to shut off the cooling and oil supply completely. As an added bonus remove the chemistry from the oil that fights all these issues which was necessary due to lower tension rings not sealing as well for as long. (They would seal fine with better bore and ring land prep $$$) Wait, doing all of this created the issues they are trying to solve and then removing the solution? They seem amazed there are lubrication related failures.  :idiot: 

 

If you know the issues, you have a solution. More cooling and more viscosity in oils that are more shear stable and more heat tolerant. The API SP ultra-thin oils they are calling out are the not cutting the mustard. Bottom rung on the ladder. Picture pig crap on the bottom of your shoe. That is how much elevation above the bottom rung you get with a Dexos1Gen2 oil. Not even a full rung.

 

IF you insist on a 0W20 then look for a Dexos1Gen3, Porsche C20 CERTIFIEND oil. The Gen3 spec has a minimum HTHS of 2.9, same as an SAE *W30. The Porsche certification gets you MUCH better deposit control in a MID SAPS oil with more effective AW packages. 

 

Or be proactive. Use not just a *W30 but one with a ACEA C3 DEXOS2 certification minimum. Raises the HTHS to 3.5 and still a MID SAPS oil with better deposit control. (Mobil 1 ESP is a DEXOS2 certified oil as is Castrol 5W30 C3)   

 

dexos®2 | GM (gmdexos.com)

 

Cut OEM OLM in HALF minimum. 

 

As long as they have an oil filter you have access to an oil cooler HINT-HINT heavy haulers.

 

IMHO of course and these are only suggestions, not Gospel.  

 

 

 

I've been thinking about trying Mobil 1 ESP 5w30.  I am using Amsoil SS now.  Was using HPL.  

 

The only thing I don't know is whether the ESP oils have the solvency of Amsoil SS, HPL or Red Line.  I don't think they do.  I suppose for 5k mile drain intervals the ESP oils should be quite good.  

 

I'm still on the fence as to whether sulphated ash contributes to intake valve deposits.  Seems a bit more complex than just that. 

Edited by VicFirth
Posted
2 hours ago, VicFirth said:

 

I've been thinking about trying Mobil 1 ESP 5w30.  I am using Amsoil SS now.  Was using HPL.  

 

The only thing I don't know is whether the ESP oils have the solvency of Amsoil SS, HPL or Red Line.  I don't think they do.  I suppose for 5k mile drain intervals the ESP oils should be quite good.  

 

I'm still on the fence as to whether sulphated ash contributes to intake valve deposits.  Seems a bit more complex than just that. 

 

Mobil 1 ESP does not have any ester content... 

 

One of the other oil threads I posted a link about valve deposits and catch cans. Seems the deposits are even caused by the oil but by the coating on the valves. So, you can't stop it, but you can slow it way down with a higher solvency oil. Even a boasting point for HPL. 

 

Oil gets to the valves primarily from the valve guide. The better the oil control there the lower the deposit formation. In a healthy motor.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Mobil 1 ESP does not have any ester content... 

 

One of the other oil threads I posted a link about valve deposits and catch cans. Seems the deposits are even caused by the oil but by the coating on the valves. So, you can't stop it, but you can slow it way down with a higher solvency oil. Even a boasting point for HPL. 

 

Oil gets to the valves primarily from the valve guide. The better the oil control there the lower the deposit formation. In a healthy motor.

 

Thanks Grumpy.  Mobil seems to have removed the POE that was once present in the ESP line (virgin oxidation values of 35).  Now all of the Mobil 1 line has a virgin oxidation value under 10.  So they're either using AN's or something else.  It was mentioned in a post on BITOG that Mobil is now using some unconventional ingredients in their oils where they discovered something from the cosmetics industry.  They also mentioned using biobased base oils.  

 

How secret cosmetics chemical is helping Red Bull's F1 charge (motorsport.com)

 

 

"What was a long shot a few years ago - a vision of a low ash, high temperature, low friction engine oil that incorporates bio-based components became a reality this year, thanks to the efforts of our whole team, in collaboration with Honda and Red Bull."

Edited by VicFirth
Posted (edited)

Discussion on oil starts around 4:00

 

Edited by elcamino
Posted
1 hour ago, VicFirth said:

"What was a long shot a few years ago - a vision of a low ash, high temperature, low friction engine oil that incorporates bio-based components became a reality this year, thanks to the efforts of our whole team, in collaboration with Honda and Red Bull."

 

This is breaking news only if you are too young to remember the Isle of Man and the Norton Manx/Castrol collaboration.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/20/2024 at 9:02 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

This one is a headshaker. I worked for Chevron Research. Read the paper. This isn't based on anything but a desire for less waste oil. Like viscosity reduction which promoted CAFE improvement while SACRIFICTING wear protection the same is true in this case. This has been studied to death and THERE IS a correlation and underpinning causation to the crossover point and increased wear. I'm not posting that research again. 

 

 

Base oil doesn't produce contamination. Combustion byproducts do. 🤨 Really?

 

But agreed, they do tend to take longer to oxidize 'all things equal'. Problem is all things are not equal. Base oil improvement INCREASED the oxidation ONSET temperature. What did the OEM's do with that advancement? Raised bulk oil and cylinder wall temperatures. Lowered ring tension. Increased blowby. Reduced CCV vent effectiveness over the life of the vehicle, orifice instead of a check valve which is not a compensative device. Increased OCI lengths. Reduced warranty miles. Lowered wear protection callouts in oil licensing. I take it you can't read tea leaves. :crackup:Not required. Common sense is. 

 

Guy hanging by a rope as a window washer. Doc says to the guy, "If you don't lose a few pounds you will fall to your death". So, the Doc gives him a bigger rope.

 

What does this fellow do? Put on weight.

 :idiot:

 

Guy hanging by a rope as a window washer. Doc says to the guy, "If you don't lose a few pounds you will fall to your death". So, the window washer takes his advice and loses some weight.

 

Then he buys a thinner rope to hang from.

 :idiot:

 

 

 

Excellent post.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/25/2024 at 9:31 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Likely all are true. Thing is, once you know you have to figure a solution. Some of us do and the OEMs are getting wise to this as well. Rumor has it that the 2025 models will no longer have a switch to defeat the auto-stop/start. They continue to elevate their encryption. They have already complicated the cooling and oiling systems or limited the available parts to cure the elevated heat. And there are fewer and fewer choices of oils on the shelves. One might think they are trying to squeeze us out of the ICE market and into electric. 🤨  

 

GM V8's as we knew them....yea.....

 

When they started using variable displacement vane pumps not only did they remove some parasitic horsepower draw, which was a good thing, but they also inadvertently (or not) LOWERED THE COOLING CAPCITY of the motor. 😱 One of oils many functions is cooling. Lower gearing and deep overdrives lowered the water pump speeds. 

 

Hot oil is thinner oil. Then we spec a *W20, a thinner oil. Increase cooling system temperature. Add preheaters, zone cooling...do everything possible to increase operating temperature, remove lubrication and thin what lubrication there is. THEN add stop start and hybrid systems to shut off the cooling and oil supply completely. As an added bonus remove the chemistry from the oil that fights all these issues which was necessary due to lower tension rings not sealing as well for as long. (They would seal fine with better bore and ring land prep $$$) Wait, doing all of this created the issues they are trying to solve and then removing the solution? They seem amazed there are lubrication related failures.  :idiot: 

 

If you know the issues, you have a solution. More cooling and more viscosity in oils that are more shear stable and more heat tolerant. The API SP ultra-thin oils they are calling out are the not cutting the mustard. Bottom rung on the ladder. Picture pig crap on the bottom of your shoe. That is how much elevation above the bottom rung you get with a Dexos1Gen2 oil. Not even a full rung.

 

IF you insist on a 0W20 then look for a Dexos1Gen3, Porsche C20 CERTIFIEND oil. The Gen3 spec has a minimum HTHS of 2.9, same as an SAE *W30. The Porsche certification gets you MUCH better deposit control in a MID SAPS oil with more effective AW packages. 

 

Or be proactive. Use not just a *W30 but one with a ACEA C3 DEXOS2 certification minimum. Raises the HTHS to 3.5 and still a MID SAPS oil with better deposit control. (Mobil 1 ESP is a DEXOS2 certified oil as is Castrol 5W30 C3)   

 

dexos®2 | GM (gmdexos.com)

 

Cut OEM OLM in HALF minimum. 

 

As long as they have an oil filter you have access to an oil cooler HINT-HINT heavy haulers.

 

IMHO of course and these are only suggestions, not Gospel.  

 

 

 

And another!!!!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have 130K on my engine, using 0w-20 for the entire life cycle of the engine.  I have noticed that the engine oil pressure is slightly lower than what it used to be (still within comfortable levels), which I attribute to engine age.  Being in Texas, I am comfortable with using a thicker weight oil since we never get super cold weather, and I will start using 5w-30 Full Synthetic starting on my next oil change.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • IMNTBHO;  the worst thing for the 6L80 is to be lugged down to low engine rpm while in high gear......AKA, to save fuel.   I rarely use D on my '16 with the 6L80 and use M mode to keep engine RPM above 1500 at the speed I'm driving, which is also benefiticial for the tranny because line pressure is kept up because the pump is actually turning a decent speed, and it's not always hunting to drop to the next gear to lower the engine RPM's.   Never above 30mph.............M3, maybe M4 if just driving thru a small NoDak town Never above 40mph............M4 Never above 50-55mph.............M5   This is way better for the tranny and the engine.........especially if AFM is still active.   262K miles on my OEM 6L80 as I type this.
    • If they had nuclear material for "11 nukes" we'd have seized it.    Our military has been rendered either too weak/dumb to seize it, or they don't have it. Your pick,K-nut. Because right now we're fighting over who gets to toll oil tankers in the strait.    I hope you're man enough to admit you've been taken for a ride when it's finished.
    • I hope you’re man enough to admit that you were wrong when it’s finished. 
    • And you're obviously full of it too.  Apparently anything he does is perfect to you.  Don't you think this whole ordeal would have been better if he had maybe thought it all through first before bombing Iran at the request of his bffs in Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar?  They are the ones that had the biggest issue with Iran.  Thus they have been pouring the platitudes and giving gifts/bribes to him.  Had he thought about the consequences of what would happen to the Strait before starting anything, we wouldn't have this issue.  Now he is stuck with no way out of this mess.  But you have your head stuck way deep in his rabbit hole to see anything else.  So no, I don't have TDS.  I see what he is.  The derangement is yours from no oxygen in the rabbit hole.  
    • Bringing of the fact that every President has said the same thing. They can’t have nukes. I guess you missed that before epic fury they said they had enough product for 11 nukes and weren’t giving it up. That not political or polarizing. The opposition of that is and giving aid to the enemy. The mandate is decades old through many administrations. The difference is TDS.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...