Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking to get a used Sierra 19-21 I have a 17 and it’s turned out to be more of a lemon then a sure thing and I still have 4 more years with it and since I’ve had it for two years now it’s been more times in the shop for this and that . Doesn’t help that it’s my DD . So I’d really like some input on owners with these years. I’m looking at an AT4. Should I stay clear or get ? 

Posted

I purchased a 2020 Silverado double cab 5.3 with the Z71 package new. I have 53,000 miles now and except for a couple early check engine lights resolved under warranty has been trouble free. I replaced the battery at 4 years old, normal oil changes usually between 10 and 20 % on the oil life monitor. Recently, I had a transmission service, transfer case service and brake fluid exchange. All services and battery were done at a dealer. I had the dealer install Rancho 9000 shocks and struts that I ordered from Rancho. Much less bounce, better ride than the stock Ranchos. I do not tow or haul heavy loads, but it is my daily transportation.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

My opinion is the newer the better. Likely have less miles, less chance of first year problems and less wear.

Edited by CamGTP
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have a ‘21 AT4 with 6.2 and it’s the best vehicle I’ve had.  Tons of power, nice ride, lots of features, super comfortable. I’ve had it for 3 years. I bought it used in January ‘22.  No issues. Hasn’t been in the shop for anything. I will say that the stock Goodyear duratracs leave a bit to be desired and they are noisy. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Joe Drives said:

I purchased a 2020 Silverado double cab 5.3 with the Z71 package new. I have 53,000 miles now and except for a couple early check engine lights resolved under warranty has been trouble free. I replaced the battery at 4 years old, normal oil changes usually between 10 and 20 % on the oil life monitor. Recently, I had a transmission service, transfer case service and brake fluid exchange. All services and battery were done at a dealer. I had the dealer install Rancho 9000 shocks and struts that I ordered from Rancho. Much less bounce, better ride than the stock Ranchos. I do not tow or haul heavy loads, but it is my daily transportation.

 

I have the 5.3 it’s been a good to me other then it being the 8 speed and the hard shifting from time to time. But I do like the new trail boss editions those are nice but thank you for the input I appreciate it 

Posted

I have a 2020 Trail Boss LT with the 6.2 that currently has 77,000 miles.  It's been trouble free.  Only warranty work I recall having on it was the dash camera I got through GM Accessories that I had the dealer install before I took possession.  They basically replaced the main module.  Camera company is Thinkware.  There was a tailgate bushing that was replaced under warranty.  I also tried to have the dealer correct the reverse camera being slightly off angle, but that was unsuccessful and I pulled the plug on that project when GM told the dealer to replace the tailgate.  I took the truck home and looked at the reverse camera assembly and came to the conclusion the issue was GM being cheap.  Other than that, no issues aside from a few ghost CELs that resulted in nothing. 

 

I do have a friend with a 2021 GMC Sierra AT4 with the 5.3.  He told me he has the 10-speed in his truck.  Less than a year ago the transmission failed on him and the dealer had to replace it with a new unit under warranty.  I'm unaware of any other issues with his truck. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have a 2021 GMC Sierra AT4 with a 3.0 Duramax. Bought it with 6,000 miles and now have about 43,000 on it. We love it. It rides nice, gets great fuel mileage and has plenty of power to pull/haul whatever I need it for. It has 20" wheels with Bridgstone Dueller A/T tires. Great tires. Recently had  recalls for transmition shift module programming. The dealer took care of it. 1/2 hr. each time. 

  The one down side is, that I hate the mirrors. They are too small and DS has the convex in the top left corner. Hate that. PS mirror has " Objects appear closer " mirror. Hate that. Can,t back up a trailer and judge distance. I have looked into changing them with a OEM tow mirror but because I don't have the correct option in the BCM the dealer says that it can't be done. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have a '19 AT4 with the 6.2.  Just over 100k miles, towing through the mountains in the summer, DD grocery getting / kid limo in the winter. No issues so far. Oil changes according to DIC, did the transmission, front diff and rear diff fluids about 20k ago.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My 2020 6.2L AT4 has been a great truck for me. The only two problems I've had since new was oxidation on the battery connections and whining noise.  The battery connection looked good w/o corrosion, but needed to be polished due to lead oxidation on the terminals.  The whining noise was a bad idler pully as discussed on this board. My truck is very low milage but is the most comfortable I've ever owned. I'm a very proud owner and get complements all the time and will not upgrade any time soon. Best of luck finding the right truck.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 2/28/2025 at 4:30 AM, rcslotcar said:

My 2020 6.2L AT4 has been a great truck for me. The only two problems I've had since new was oxidation on the battery connections and whining noise.  The battery connection looked good w/o corrosion, but needed to be polished due to lead oxidation on the terminals.  The whining noise was a bad idler pully as discussed on this board. My truck is very low milage but is the most comfortable I've ever owned. I'm a very proud owner and get complements all the time and will not upgrade any time soon. Best of luck finding the right truck.

Yes sir…I appreciate your feedback TY

Posted

I have a 21 RST Z71 6.2/10spd that's my daily. It's at about 39,000 miles with the only issue being a door lock actuator that started making noise just before 3/36 was up so I had it replaced. The 6.2/10spd combo is heaven on 4 wheels.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

There's no consistency with this generation, so check it out closely and look at the repair history.  I know someone who's had '19, '22 and now '24 6.2 trucks with minor warranty issues, and then another who had a '21 that blew two 6.2 motors.  My '21 5.3 was in the shop more than I drove it for the first few years with multiple rear window leaks, camera issues repeatedly, mirror replacements, several parking sensor failures, check engine lights, wiring harnesses under the hood and in the rear, stereo/touchscreen failures, coolant leaks and more.  All GM gave me for my "trouble" was a small discount on a new truck if I bought before the end of '25.  

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...