Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thoughts on using this filter?

 

I recently put a btr 220 cam in, dod delete, upgraded trunnions. The shop that did the work says they use this filter in all of the LT based cars, trucks they modify. 
 

 

IMG_0288.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

Thoughts on using this filter?

 

I recently put a btr 220 cam in, dod delete, upgraded trunnions. The shop that did the work says they use this filter in all of the LT based cars, trucks they modify. 
 

 

IMG_0288.jpeg

 


Eh.  I'd run the UPF63R as the PF-63 is the spec'd filter for the trucks.  

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, newdude said:

 


Eh.  I'd run the UPF63R as the PF-63 is the spec'd filter for the trucks.  


Didn’t know they made a 63r. Thanks

 

 

Edited by M1ck3y
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

The PF64 / UPF64 is the filter spec for a 6.2L LT1 in the 6th generation Camaro, so you're not wrong about it being applicable to LT-based engines. The PF64 is shorter than the PF63, so it's better protected and does not extend beyond the oil pan, given the low clearance of the Camaro's undercarriage.

 

I'd use the 63 in a truck application, larger filter media, because there's ample room for it.

Edited by Atlas
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

 

On 10/9/2025 at 8:33 AM, Atlas said:

The PF64 / UPF64 is the filter spec for a 6.2L LT1 in the 6th generation Camaro, so you're not wrong about it being applicable to LT-based engines. The PF64 is shorter than the PF63, so it's better protected and does not extend beyond the oil pan, given the low clearance of the Camaro's undercarriage.

 

I'd use the 63 in a truck application, larger filter media, because there's ample room for it.

I use AC2057F oil filters on the better halves 2025 Subaru Crosstrek Wilderness 2.5L H4 naturally activated. Oil analysis and observation shows these filters work great. 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/25/2025 at 7:15 AM, Black02Silverado said:

UPF63R will work well like others stated. Not sire the cost on it but another option for a quality filter is the AMSOIL EaO17. 
 

AMSOIL Oil filters

 

I bought a handful of AMSOIL filters to try from @Black02Silverado for the Mitsubishi. Yes they were a bit over a dollar a piece more than the Purolator Pure One I've been running and on paper have equal 99% at 20 micron ratings. BUT, the difference even in external construction is HUGE. In fact, not another filter on my preferred list is built like that. 

 

I didn't put pencil to paper but the inlet area is vastly larger and the endcap is tank like in construction. Grippy coating, unlike the FRAM XG still allows the proper cup filter wrench to be used. Center tube is crush proof. I got my dollars worth. 

 

My cost is in consideration of my AMSOIL membership discount. I buy enough to make that membership cost disappear. 

 

I'm not selling for Nick nor endorsing AMSOIL. I'm stating facts based on my experience. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

I prefer FRAM's new Synthetic Endurance.  I would never use their base filters, but their new Synthetic Endurance, and their Ultra Synthetic are very good filters from what I can gather.  The Synthetic Endurance is rated for 25,000 miles, but I swap them out every oil change which usually around 7,000 to 7,500 miles according to the OCI light on the dash.  The oil generally has a slightly darker amber tint to it when it gets changed, which is significantly cleaner/clearer in appearance than any oil change I ever did with the OEM filter (dark as coffee). 

image.thumb.png.c57360457218f9f5aa1429cdcdb896a8.png

Edited by Gangly
Posted
On 10/26/2025 at 9:58 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I bought a handful of AMSOIL filters to try from @Black02Silverado for the Mitsubishi. Yes they were a bit over a dollar a piece more than the Purolator Pure One I've been running and on paper have equal 99% at 20 micron ratings. BUT, the difference even in external construction is HUGE. In fact, not another filter on my preferred list is built like that. 

 

I didn't put pencil to paper but the inlet area is vastly larger and the endcap is tank like in construction. Grippy coating, unlike the FRAM XG still allows the proper cup filter wrench to be used. Center tube is crush proof. I got my dollars worth. 

 

My cost is in consideration of my AMSOIL membership discount. I buy enough to make that membership cost disappear. 

 

I'm not selling for Nick nor endorsing AMSOIL. I'm stating facts based on my experience. 

Grumpy,

The FRAM Synthetic Endurance is a relatively new filter, but I would love to hear your thoughts on it, if you have any.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gangly said:

Grumpy,

The FRAM Synthetic Endurance is a relatively new filter, but I would love to hear your thoughts on it, if you have any.

 

I haven't even seen one in person sir. Sorry. I can say that a few places that supply their own filters will recommend the Endurance when they cannot, for whatever reason, supply one of their own. Seems like an endorsement of sorts. Grain of salt required perhaps.

 

Here's the business end of the ones Nick sent me. 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.87c8a4c03032dd7a1c4543fd92f1f501.jpeg

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Fram Endurance is awesome. Made by Champion Labs. More than a passing resemblance to the Amsoil. Media looked no different to me when I cut them both open. Can get it at Walmart so it’s pretty convenient too.

Posted
4 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Fram Endurance is awesome. Made by Champion Labs. More than a passing resemblance to the Amsoil. Media looked no different to me when I cut them both open. Can get it at Walmart so it’s pretty convenient too.

Amsoil FF media is Donaldson made. I suspect the whole filter is. 

Posted
1 hour ago, customboss said:

Amsoil FF media is Donaldson made. I suspect the whole filter is. 

I’m not guessing or “suspecting” when I say what I say. In my application the Amsoil and Fram Endurance are basically the same filter and definitely Champion. Base plate, media, even the little blue clip on the spring. IMG_1452.thumb.jpeg.6fcf5011a746745c2a9a84b61c2eb208.jpeg
Fram

IMG_1454.thumb.webp.94fda35026f8977649df5f33418a8a0c.webpIMG_1453.thumb.webp.e3037bfdef09d7e4d6a1438c5cc32d96.webp
Royal Purple too but the base plate is a little different and the ADBV is purple. 🤷🏻‍♂️

IMG_1456.thumb.webp.682165234bbc50cb3910c6beb67b1c84.webp

  • Thanks 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Why don't I have a good scanner? I've always wanted one when I've needed one.   My latest reading says I don't need to do a relearn on the ckp sensor on a 1995 with OBD 1.5. The relearn is prescribed for the later-model 1995's which shipped with actual OBD II when GM completed the transition in prep for the 1996 MY. I need to confirm that. Did you know forums are disappearing? Knuckleheads on Facebook... it's not the same. It's just not.   So, scanners. Again, shooting myself in the foot for having eBayed my Snap On MT2500 "brick" with all the adapters. Not that I couldn't buy another but those are getting quite old, and mine wasn't new enough to work on 2000's vehicles.   Damn it (as I'm scanning my email between paragraphs here). Did you know there's a 2000 Jimmy 2-door on BaT that's ending this morning? It's local. I want it. 14k miles. Absolutely beautiful.   Back to scanners. MT2500's are old. Solus, now that could be a contender. There's a ~2008 Verus with a system error that's basically new in box for cheap. Hmm...I'm not sure about a scanner that runs an archaic version of windows (95 or CE, I can't tell).   I want the ability to reset and rotate TPMS, test individual modules, bleed ABS, electronic parking brake controls for servicing brakes, relearn procedures and other bidirectional controls.   Snap On does an MT2600. It's a new model as of last year, marketed as their "entry" scanner. Entry? Only where $1900 gets you through the doorway plus, I'm guessing, $1000/year if you wish to keep it current. So goes scan tools actually designed for production environments. Want decent products with excellent support, you pay for it.   Everyone is raving about Autels and TopDons and Foxconns and all these newer brands that are selling the $500 "prosumer" scanners for backyard hacks like me. They're tempting...honestly. Updates are cheaper, base prices are remarkably cheaper... And you get to deal with bugs and translation whoopsies and, well, just don't use it on anything expensive, OK? Having a dealer replace an ECU because it needs to be re-imaged after an adventure in scanning is no joke. But I think most people are getting by OK with these units.   eBay on a scratch-and-sniff pro-model oldie, a shiny new TopDon, or???   God dang it, I can't stop looking at this Jimmy. I'm ready! I'll Bring The TRailer! It's beautiful.
    • I removed the OE running boards.  It looked so much better.  I wish I took them off a long time ago.     I had to put something back on for my wife.  I wanted Westin Sure Grip Running Boards but they are very pricey, like $600 plus.  I was going to go with the Ionic 41's like I had on the 2019 Silverado but went with Westin Outlaw Drop Steps instead, about $200 cheaper.  They are sturdy and functional but not super crazy about the look, but it works.  
    • It's all a crock of 💩
    • I had a Gen5DIY DRL relocate harness from a 2022 1500 that I saved. I had Gen5DIY modify the harness for my 2024 Silverado 2500. Plug n Play, worked perfectly.    Here's a video I made for the 2022 1500 truck. The install is more or less the same on a 2500.    The harness relocates the DRL tot he top amber turn signal on my 2500.     
    • Can ask that about a lot of places.   Holiday sells 91 for $1 over 87 octane. BP 93 is 80 cents. Amoco 93 is 80 cents Kwik Trips is $1.20 for 92 or whatever they have and $1 for the 91.   I know that this is not exactly same as what you are saying with the premium to premium debate of those two stations but why is there such a difference. Top Tier this and that, it's all BS. All the fuel comes from the same damn refinery, so give me a break.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...