Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It might,

 

I saw a sierra a few days a go with a procomp lift on the stock AT wheels running 37s....probably rubs like a mofo ...I didnt ask the guy but man it looked sick. Didn't have my phone on me to take a picture.

 

Thanks for the reply, I figured that question flew into outer space and therefore would never be answered. Yeah I think I'm going to end up have to do some serious measuring to decide it they would fit.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the reply, I figured that question flew into outer space and therefore would never be answered. Yeah I think I'm going to end up have to do some serious measuring to decide it they would fit.

Haha dont worry bro.

 

Turns out my girl got a pic of it.... Sgitty but you get the point. post-143469-145936953925_thumb.jpg

 

 

I actually walked up to it..... It was deff running 37x12.5x20s toyo MTs but it was a tad dark and didnt want to bust out the flashlight and look under it and get shot at

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

post-143469-145936953925_thumb.jpg

post-143469-145936953925_thumb.jpg

post-143469-145936953925_thumb.jpg

Posted

Who if anyone is running 22x14s on 37 inch tires on a 2014 Silverado. What size lift. I have a 7.5 and a 1.5 body lift before I mount my tires I wanna make sure it will fit

Posted

Gentlemen,

 

I'm in the market for a lift on my 2015 Silverado 1500 4x4 and wanted to see if anyone has used the 4.5" Zone suspension lift with 33's yet? I tried looking thru the entire thread but 149 pages is pretty extensive. My last truck was a 2011 Silverado with a 3.5" X 1.75" suspension lift on 33's. I had the 20" x 9" KMC XD Cranks with zero offset running 305/55/R20 Trail Grapplers and ran into some rubbing issues turned in reverse. That being said, I was hoping the 4.5" would help with that. I haven't decided on the wheel just yet, but i do know I want to continue with the same tire as before. Any suggestions on offsets that would fit for possibly a 20" X 10" at most.

 

Lift I am considering;

http://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-2015-Chevrolet-Silverado-GMC-Sierra-1500-4-5-Zone-Suspension-Lift-kit-4x4-/171557627846?fits=Year%3A2015|Model%3ASilverado+1500&hash=item27f1a1a7c6:g:d7YAAOSwLzdWTSwq&vxp=mtr

 

Also, the lift on this page states "All wheel drive models require drive line modification"???????

 

Any help is much appreciated.

 

I am running the zone 4.5" lift. I am running 295/70/18s (34.5" tall) with no rubbing issues at all. my wheels are 18x9 0+ offset. so i think you should be fine running the 33's. and i don't think they did anything to my driveline when they installed...but i'm not 100%.

 

here's a pic....

Lifted

Posted (edited)

 

I am running the zone 4.5" lift. I am running 295/70/18s (34.5" tall) with no rubbing issues at all. my wheels are 18x9 0+ offset. so i think you should be fine running the 33's. and i don't think they did anything to my driveline when they installed...but i'm not 100%.

 

here's a pic....

Thanks for the reply and picture. Great looking truck man... Do you have any side pictures by chance to show how far the tires stick out? I spoke with Zone directly yesterday and they stated that the driveline modification is referring to those that run AWD at high rates of speeds (60+) due to the possible vibration from the driveshaft. They suggested a double cardan/dual cardan joint to help relieve this vibration. Those that only use 4WD when needed a slower speeds will not see a large difference. The only time I expect to run at high rates is when it snows down here and I'm running on the highway. If I notice a difference then I'll do some more investigating on the double cardan joint.

Edited by randomposter
Posted

Thanks for the reply and picture. Great looking truck man... Do you have any side pictures by chance to show how far the tires stick out? I spoke with Zone directly yesterday and they stated that the driveline modification is referring to those that run AWD at high rates of speeds (60+) due to the possible vibration from the driveshaft. They suggested a double cardan/dual cardan joint to help relieve this vibration. Those that only use 4WD when needed a slower speeds will not see a large difference. The only time I expect to run at high rates is when it snows down here and I'm running on the highway. If I notice a difference then I'll do some more investigating on the double cardan joint.

Yeah, I live in GA.....so no high speed 4-wheeling in the snow for me, so i apologize but i can't give you insight on that part.

 

i'd say the tires stick from the fenders about 2"- 2.5". I used a 1.5" wheel spacer on each rear wheel so they match the track at the front. here are the pics along the side.

pre- rear wheel spacer

with 1.5" rear wheel spacer

with 1.5" rear wheel spacer

Posted

 

I am running the zone 4.5" lift. I am running 295/70/18s (34.5" tall) with no rubbing issues at all. my wheels are 18x9 0+ offset. so i think you should be fine running the 33's. and i don't think they did anything to my driveline when they installed...but i'm not 100%.

 

here's a pic....

hey what wheels are those? thanks beautiful truck i like the tire size!!!

Posted

Yeah, I live in GA.....so no high speed 4-wheeling in the snow for me, so i apologize but i can't give you insight on that part.

 

i'd say the tires stick from the fenders about 2"- 2.5". I used a 1.5" wheel spacer on each rear wheel so they match the track at the front. here are the pics along the side.

That looks great man. Thanks for the info and pics.

Posted

I am very confused as what lift I should get installed. I am only looking for a max of 5 inches of lift. I want to run stock wheels right now so my options are zone 4.5, rc 5 bracket, and rc knuckle. What are the advantages or disadvantages of a bracket vs. knuckle type lift? I realize the track will increase but is that the only good or bad thing. What lift would you recommend here? Thanks for any help.

Posted

Knuckle lift is easier to install and usually cheaper if you are comparing the same brand. Your wheel will stick out beyond the fender and you will have to run rear spacers in the rear if you want it to match.

The bracket lift will keep all of your stock angle and stock track.

Basically the way I look at it is my truck looks like it is 2500 HD that is maybe an inch taller. It looks like something the factory could build and is not overstated. I could not get away with a lot of the set up a that people run on here in Massachusetts

Technically I am illegal now. But looking stock brings no attention.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the explanation and makes allot of sense. It just seems but only a couple companies make the bracket lift so I wasn't sure what why that is. I do prefer to keep the track as close to stock and maybe go with 295/60 tires. Do you think they will fit without spacers with your lift.

Posted

- 4 inch BDS rear block kit with fox shocks

- 20x9 Fuel Mavericks wrapped with 285/65r20 BFG KO2's

attachicon.gif0330161709-1.jpg

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

15green, going from a stock tire( assuming you had a 31 inch to start) to a 34 inch.. Is there a noticeable difference in power loss? Meaning effectively running a 3.12 now vs 3.42? with stock tires

95b54e7835778d6366ebc962e32ce7c9.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Posted

6" Fabtech lift with Fuel 20x10's on 35x12.5 Nitto Terra Grappler G2's

post-154438-0-15224000-1459918557_thumb.jpeg

post-154438-0-15224000-1459918557_thumb.jpeg

post-154438-0-15224000-1459918557_thumb.jpeg

post-154438-0-15224000-1459918557_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 5
Posted

hey what wheels are those? thanks beautiful truck i like the tire size!!!

the rims are FN. Thanks.

 

That looks great man. Thanks for the info and pics.

 

Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3,038 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...