Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You think? Even with the Tire size?

 

Larger tires always look better IMO. If you go 4" then 33's look great. If you go 6" do 35's

Posted

 

Larger tires always look better IMO. If you go 4" then 33's look great. If you go 6" do 35's

I like the tires on there. Of course i'd like to get 35's. But the ones i have are just over 32. I'll probably do the 4"

  • Like 1
Posted

I like the tires on there. Of course i'd like to get 35's. But the ones i have are just over 32. I'll probably do the 4"

 

Pics when your done bro! :)

  • Like 1
Posted

Added some Iron Cross Patriot running boards.. Like them better than the factory chrome ones. They tuck higher up so it adds to the looks of the lift. IMO

 

55a52462-8644-4bbe-9f34-5eb693bf22bd.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Just installed BDS 6" with fox rear shocks and leaf springs instead of blocks.

Tires are Mickey Thompson 35x12.5x20

Wheels are Fuel Hostage 20x10 -12 offset

Hypertech Max Energy programmer.

No rubbing

Also had exhaust put on. True dual.

 

The front does stick out more than the back. I believe the lift pushed out the track about 1.5 inches. I did have a Rancho 2.5" leveling kit. It rode horribly. The BDS rides much nicer.

 

26578355556_31dc919b8b_b.jpg

 

26331327320_1602bf17f3_b.jpg

 

26578356966_191a1f9d49_b.jpg

 

26511533532_dd795426c7_b.jpg

 

26604588745_f019e19fa9_b.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted (edited)

Hey guys. I've loved seeing the trucks. I want to keep my factory 20s and get 35x12.50. No rub and I do lots of Offroad travel and work... That being said I'm lookin at zone 4.5" and 6.5". Which would produce the best look and the least issues rub turn and flex wise ? Pictures with factory wheels would be awesome. Or if anyone wants to sell me a set of A/T wheels!! Oh trucks a 2015 GMC CC standard bed 4x4 w/3.42 and 5.3l

Edited by skallywag
Posted

Hey guys. I've loved seeing the trucks. I want to keep my factory 20s and get 35x12.50. No rub and I do lots of Offroad travel and work... That being said I'm lookin at zone 4.5" and 6.5". Which would produce the best look and the least issues rub turn and flex wise ? Pictures with factory wheels would be awesome. Or if anyone wants to sell me a set of A/T wheels!! Oh trucks a 2015 GMC CC standard bed 4x4 w/3.42 and 5.3l

 

I love the stock rims with aggressive tires.....toyo's 35x12.5x20 on 6.5" zone lift without spacers and at full loack both ways in forward and reverse no rubbing at all......i will have more pics when i get in wednesday....i think i sent (quoted) these pics to you the other day unless this crappy internet offshore didnt let me....

 

post-143838-0-66081000-1461513302_thumb.jpg

 

post-143838-0-70345900-1461513318_thumb.jpg

 

post-143838-0-48552900-1461513338_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-66081000-1461513302_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-70345900-1461513318_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-48552900-1461513338_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-66081000-1461513302_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-70345900-1461513318_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-48552900-1461513338_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-66081000-1461513302_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-70345900-1461513318_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-48552900-1461513338_thumb.jpg

Posted

 

I love the stock rims with aggressive tires.....toyo's 35x12.5x20 on 6.5" zone lift without spacers and at full loack both ways in forward and reverse no rubbing at all......i will have more pics when i get in wednesday....i think i sent (quoted) these pics to you the other day unless this crappy internet offshore didnt let me....

 

attachicon.giflifted.jpg

 

attachicon.giflift2.JPG

 

attachicon.giflift1.JPG

Looks sharp!

  • Like 1
Posted

4.5 may not give you the clearance. I get minimal rub on drivers side with wheels cut to the left going in some driveways when the shock is compressed & mine has a six inch lift with 35X12.50 on 20X10 inch rims.

  • Like 1
Posted

4.5 may not give you the clearance. I get minimal rub on drivers side with wheels cut to the left going in some driveways when the shock is compressed & mine has a six inch lift with 35X12.50 on 20X10 inch rims.

Any chance on getting some photos? I had 20x12's shipped to me, but they were Ford bolt pattern, so I had to send them back. Now I'm on the fence again. People are telling me the 12's will rub really bad unless I lift 9+inches. I don't want the too much lift, not enough tire look, so I might go back to 10's with 7" of lift.

Posted

Any chance on getting some photos? I had 20x12's shipped to me, but they were Ford bolt pattern, so I had to send them back. Now I'm on the fence again. People are telling me the 12's will rub really bad unless I lift 9+inches. I don't want the too much lift, not enough tire look, so I might go back to 10's with 7" of lift.

 

Per your request. I get a slight rub on the inside of the wheel well on the side by the driver's door. Only enough to rub the paint off of the inside edge of the fender flare.

 

post-151288-0-27153700-1461554165_thumb.jpegpost-151288-0-51254300-1461554190_thumb.jpg

post-151288-0-27153700-1461554165_thumb.jpeg

post-151288-0-51254300-1461554190_thumb.jpg

post-151288-0-27153700-1461554165_thumb.jpeg

post-151288-0-51254300-1461554190_thumb.jpg

post-151288-0-27153700-1461554165_thumb.jpeg

post-151288-0-51254300-1461554190_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, great looking truck. Such a pain in the ass trying to figure out what setup to go with. Pretty certain I'm going with Mcgauphy 7-9ss, with chrome wheels. just on the fence about wheel width/offset. Thinking I should play it safe with a 10" wheel

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...