Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks. Did you notice a very big difference on ride quality and engine performance going from stock tires to 10 ply?

The 10 ply's i originally had were heavy, so there was a noticeable difference here. But between getting these new tires, I actually drove a stock demo pickup and how there was a difference, it wasn't enough that I was left wanting more performance more than loving having the taller tires.

I actually like the ride better with these KO2's.

Posted

Installed Bilsteins on all four, top setting.

Got an alignment, and also adjusted my headlights.

Took notes of before and after for fender wall heights.

 

Stock Rancho Shocks:

* Front Left -- 35.75"

* Front Right -- 35.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 38.75"

Bilstein Shocks:

* Front Left -- 37.75"

* Front Right -- 37.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 39.125"

 

1.5" of rake, but that's exactly what I wanted.

Waaaaay smoother than the stock Ranchos.

Night and day difference, great investment.

Looks good. Did you put larger tires on? Are those 20in rims? Do you tow or load up the bed much? My rear sinks really easily when I load it up and I'm worried that if I put on the Bilsteins up front it'll make the rear sag too much.

Posted

Looks good. Did you put larger tires on? Are those 20in rims? Do you tow or load up the bed much? My rear sinks really easily when I load it up and I'm worried that if I put on the Bilsteins up front it'll make the rear sag too much.

275/55R20's on right now. I plan on trying 275/60 and 275/65, since there's quite a bit of room when I cut the wheels and measure. I can for sure put 33's, most likely 34, but 35 will definitely require trimming. I don't tow often, but I have to load up the bed often for work. Usually it's not more than 1000 lbs in weight, and I have yet to try it. I'll post pics and measure the bed loaded down when I can.

Posted

275/55R20's on right now. I plan on trying 275/60 and 275/65, since there's quite a bit of room when I cut the wheels and measure. I can for sure put 33's, most likely 34, but 35 will definitely require trimming. I don't tow often, but I have to load up the bed often for work. Usually it's not more than 1000 lbs in weight, and I have yet to try it. I'll post pics and measure the bed loaded down when I can.

If you do end up snapping some pictures and taking some measurements of it with the bed loaded up, I would love to see your results!

Posted

Who do you all recommend installing the leveling kit? I imagine the dealer is going to overcharge. I'm going with the RC 2.5" and will be having 285/65/18's put on at the same time so I'm looking for an alignment and headlight adjustment as well.

Posted

Installed Bilsteins on all four, top setting.

Got an alignment, and also adjusted my headlights.

Took notes of before and after for fender wall heights.

Stock Rancho Shocks:

* Front Left -- 35.75"

* Front Right -- 35.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 38.75"

Bilstein Shocks:

* Front Left -- 37.75"

* Front Right -- 37.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 39.125"

1.5" of rake, but that's exactly what I wanted.

Waaaaay smoother than the stock Ranchos.

Night and day difference, great investment.

can I ask what you payed? Was on the fence between the bilesteins and the RC2.5. I'm looking to put 275/65/20s ko2s as well but wasn't sure on the fit, don't want rubbing or having to trim. Keep us posted please.
Posted

If you do end up snapping some pictures and taking some measurements of it with the bed loaded up, I would love to see your results!

Got some pics with the boat attached. 37.75" in front, 38.0625" in back. That's still 5/16" of rake. Granted, if I loaded the bed down more, or put a heavier trailer on, I'd probably end up slightly nose high. I kind of anticipated that being a possibility, in which case I want to look into getting the Roadmaster Active Suspension. It's like add a leaf, but helps handling whether you have a trailer/loaded bed or not, plus you don't have to take anything apart... Worth the research.

post-143665-0-31415800-1450558027_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-96052200-1450558035_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-58374900-1450558047_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-69296100-1450558060_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-82461500-1450558071_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-31415800-1450558027_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-96052200-1450558035_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-58374900-1450558047_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-69296100-1450558060_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-82461500-1450558071_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-31415800-1450558027_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-96052200-1450558035_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-58374900-1450558047_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-69296100-1450558060_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-82461500-1450558071_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-31415800-1450558027_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-96052200-1450558035_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-58374900-1450558047_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-69296100-1450558060_thumb.jpeg

post-143665-0-82461500-1450558071_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

can I ask what you payed? Was on the fence between the bilesteins and the RC2.5. I'm looking to put 275/65/20s ko2s as well but wasn't sure on the fit, don't want rubbing or having to trim. Keep us posted please.

Front shocks -- $186.24 delivered from AJUSA

Rear shocks -- $143.22 delivered from AJUSA

Install -- $100 local mechanic (I observed the process, took him an hour each, but would've taken me longer trying to figure it out!)

Alignment -- $85 local shop (took about an hour)

 

So that's $329.46 in parts, $185 in labor.

I aimed the headlights back down myself.

I'll be looking into tires as well, but it'll have to wait until after the holidays.

Posted

Installed Bilsteins on all four, top setting.

Got an alignment, and also adjusted my headlights.

Took notes of before and after for fender wall heights.

 

Stock Rancho Shocks:

* Front Left -- 35.75"

* Front Right -- 35.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 38.75"

Bilstein Shocks:

* Front Left -- 37.75"

* Front Right -- 37.75"

* Rear Left -- 39.25"

* Rear Right -- 39.125"

 

1.5" of rake, but that's exactly what I wanted.

Waaaaay smoother than the stock Ranchos.

Night and day difference, great investment.

Sorry probably a dumb question but the Blisteins in the rear are not adjustable like the fronts correct? If you wanted to keep more of a factory rake it'd take taller blocks in the rear? How did the right rear get higher/closer to level with the left?

Posted (edited)

Sorry probably a dumb question but the Blisteins in the rear are not adjustable like the fronts correct? If you wanted to keep more of a factory rake it'd take taller blocks in the rear? How did the right rear get higher/closer to level with the left?

You're correct, the rear shocks are not adjustable. They're often described as " 0-1 inches " but with further research, I found that it means it can accommodate a block that's 1" taller than the stock block and still work properly.

 

I'm not quite sure why that number fluctuated, might have something to do with how full the gas tank is. Chevy lean is no myth haha. It could also have to do with raising the front, slightly shifted the weight to the back and leveled it out a bit.

Edited by Zachlovesfood
Posted

Looks good. Did you put larger tires on? Are those 20in rims? Do you tow or load up the bed much? My rear sinks really easily when I load it up and I'm worried that if I put on the Bilsteins up front it'll make the rear sag too much.

If you're worried about sag but want the bilsteins... put them on and then if you have a problem with sag, add air bags or an add-a-leaf to the back.

Posted

The 10 ply's i originally had were heavy, so there was a noticeable difference here. But between getting these new tires, I actually drove a stock demo pickup and how there was a difference, it wasn't enough that I was left wanting more performance more than loving having the taller tires.

I actually like the ride better with these KO2's.

 

Makes sense, ya that is a good difference. I thought I read you had the same tires (might have been someone else). Goes to show how much large swings in rotational mass can change the vehicle performance...

 

Tyler

Posted

What are u guys using to correct the speedo?

My Garmin Cycling gps lol

 

I just find out how much its off at the speeds I normally go and go off of that.

 

I may do a tune to the truck and fix it that way, but idk. Not a huge deal right now.

Posted

 

Makes sense, ya that is a good difference. I thought I read you had the same tires (might have been someone else). Goes to show how much large swings in rotational mass can change the vehicle performance...

 

Tyler

Oh absolutely! Down the road a bit I'm looking into getting some lighter wheels too. Hopefully that will drop the whole set up down quite a bit in weight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You could try a used 1, they used that engine in the Astro vans, Plenty of them in the boneyard. Look for a wrecked or rotted 1 so the chance that it was scrapped for that reason and not a mechanical issue will be greater
    • Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • That computer lies!
    • My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...