Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK so to the untrained eye not much difference in appearance. But for myself it still looks great but I can tell the difference. Besides the rubbing, going to the BFG from the Toyo open country extreme, not near the highway road noise with the BFG's. Also have better steering response and less tire sway. It might have been possible to stay in that 295/55 size, but would have to have multiple tire combination to see as every tire width spec are different. In the 295/55 r20 Toyo only made the extreme.... My friend at the Chevy dealer where I got both sets of tire is the best. He let me drive a week on the Toyo an then gave me full credit towards the BFG tire and even a little refund.....

 

Very nice of your friend, I prefer toyo over bfg though, I know they have a solid following but I just don't have good experience with their products. I personally like the way the 285/55 looks on these trucks leveled, people stuff way too big tires in them and it looks dumb. 295/55 is the biggest I'd be comfortable going but I'll probably just go with 285/55

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

Sent from my treestand using Tapatalk

Posted

My understanding is that by raising the perch you are pre-loading the spring which in turn is creating lift. The end result is you have increased the distance between the top mount of the strut and the bottom mount. The angles of your control arms etc. will be impacted in the same manner as a spacer of equal lift height. I don't have any special expertise in this area, I'm simply sharing my understanding from the reading i have done. Money is the main reason I chose a spacer over Bilsteins! There are many who report a rougher ride from Bilsteins at max height and there are those that report a rough ride from 2" leveling spacers. The research I have done favors no noticeable negative impact in ride quality from either method.

 

That is not true. The Bilstein preloads the spring and there are countless reports of a rougher ride (which makes sense and is known) when they are all the way up. Spacers don't change the spring or shock at all so ride will not change. The only ride difference will be the bottoming out of either the ball joints or bump stops since they are extended over large bumps, but the rebound and absorption characteristics won't change.

 

One plus is the shock of the bilstein and it may help off set some of the harsher ride of the preload but not all since they still have to set up the shock to work at stock height well in addition to the preloaded lifted height.

 

Either way the bilsteins will ride rougher in certain instances and a spacer (as long as it isn't preload) won't ride any different in most all instances.

 

Tyler

Posted

 

That is not true. The Bilstein preloads the spring and there are countless reports of a rougher ride (which makes sense and is known) when they are all the way up. Spacers don't change the spring or shock at all so ride will not change. The only ride difference will be the bottoming out of either the ball joints or bump stops since they are extended over large bumps, but the rebound and absorption characteristics won't change.

 

One plus is the shock of the bilstein and it may help off set some of the harsher ride of the preload but not all since they still have to set up the shock to work at stock height well in addition to the preloaded lifted height.

 

Either way the bilsteins will ride rougher in certain instances and a spacer (as long as it isn't preload) won't ride any different in most all instances.

 

Tyler

What is not true? I reported what I understood and qualified my comments by stating my lack of expertise. It appears you have information to add but I take offense to you suggesting what I am telling is an untruth (lie). Please explain what you understand as the difference between creating lift with a spacer or raising the perch.

Posted

Ok done tons of research. Want to go full lift later down the road. Still on stock sle 20s on my 2015 gmc 1500 and factory Goodyears at 30k are showing some good wear. Have the rc2.5" w/2" rear block. Looking at nitto trails on these wheels size 35x11.50r20 see a few guys doing 35x12.50r20 with levels also looking at 295/60r20 cooper stt pro and toyo at2 also 295/65r20 in the toyo at2

Any experience with these sizes. Have the front valence removed just don't want to rub metal. I do use truck Offroad lots.

Posted (edited)

 

Ok done tons of research. Want to go full lift later down the road. Still on stock sle 20s on my 2015 gmc 1500 and factory Goodyears at 30k are showing some good wear. Have the rc2.5" w/2" rear block. Looking at nitto trails on these wheels size 35x11.50r20 see a few guys doing 35x12.50r20 with levels also looking at 295/60r20 cooper stt pro and toyo at2 also 295/65r20 in the toyo at2

Any experience with these sizes. Have the front valence removed just don't want to rub metal. I do use truck Offroad lots.

Running 295/60/20 toyo AT II extremes stock high country rims +27 on 2.5" RC/Bilstein 5100 level. Fronts just barely rub at full lock in reverse on pavement. Off-road would need to trim some inner fender well on mine but I'm solely on pavement. Probably the biggest you can go without some inner fender modification but just what I found. Others may have different experience. Hope that helps.

Edited by bwilloby46
Posted

Yeah I am not sure u will be able to do any width of 35's on just a level...I have 285/55r22's in the Nitto trail grapplers which are a 34.5"x12" and I am on Bilstein 5100's all the way to the top and I had to do some trimming to the plastics and zip ties...they rub slightly on 1/4-1/ turns and pretty good when turning and going over bumps...I think a 35" would have to go on a 3" level and driving straight not to run...lol. I might be going with some fox 2.0 and cognito UCA's and lift the front closer to 3" and see where I am at but I still thing 35" are pushing it.

Oh and my wheels are a +12

Posted

Why not a 7.5? [emoji6]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Man I really want to go 7" FTS and 18x12 37x13.50 but I don't want to dump $7500 haha. Then I would have to get steps!

Posted

I installed the RC 2.5 leveling kit on my 2014 (front only) and looking into getting some new shoes. Is it possible to run a 285/75r18 on the factory 18s? Ive been eyeing the toyo m/t and trail grapplers. I don't mind trimming/zip tie some carpet but I prefer to not have it rub. So if anyone can shed some light that would be great

Posted

May just have to go down to a 17x9 -12 and a smaller tire to keep a wide footprint for the sand and curtains spots of mud I drive in. Maybe I can clear a 33x12.50 mud grappler without to much damage to the fenders!

Posted

I ran 275/70 18's trail grapplers on the same leveling kit, and it fill out the wheel wells so nicely

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...