Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

  • Like 4
Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

Appreciate it buddy! Loving it so far. I agree, the updated front ends on these trucks look amazing.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

 

I find that hard to believe. I have seen plenty, most contain large rims, low profile stretched tires mud tires, big lifts and painted under carriage pieces and a host of lights. I have also seen a few overly done autozone special stripe/chrome/emblem editions...

 

I like that truck, especially the color and many others but have seen plenty of ugly ones. In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly but can certainly be improved or dressed properly, headlights are too small for that truck. Though I thought the 99-06 style was good looking, they tried to follow the same design theme with the current style, problem is the front ends got larger so it looks out of balance on some levels.

 

Certainly enjoy seeing the different ideas and trucks people do.

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

 

In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly....

 

I agree that the 2014-15s are the best looking of the new body style. I drive by the dealer daily and see all those Darth Vader front ends and am happy I needed a new truck in 2014 and not now.

Posted

Just installed a moto fab 2.5in leveling kit. Extremely happy with the results but the front end is a little higher then the rear so I will be replacing the read blocks next. Any suggestions on what size blocks to get?

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I used the rear blocks that came with my 2.5 RCX kit (2" blocks, I believe). They were about 1/2" taller than the stock blocks if I recall correctly.

 

For towing, you can't beat the Firestone RideRite air bags. Run them at 5psi for everyday driving, then pump them up to 100psi for max load. I find with about 35psi in the bags, I can tow my 5000# tractor with a level stance. Eliminates the azz sag and gives more steering control.

 

I did not install the onboard compressor but I have an air compressor in my garage, so it's easy to air up.

 

Try them and change your life!

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Didn't attach a picture to my last post...

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

30,000 miles on truck now with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

 

30,000 with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

Posted

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

10-4

 

Sweet deal. I tow about 3500 lbs when I tow. Running 80 mph, 305 tires get ~ 11mpg.

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yessir ill shoot you some pictures. I am ordering them today from Amazon.

Posted

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haven't noticed anything yet! Rides similar to stock. Tires may it a tad more rough, but that's expected. I'm going to replace the rear shocks anyways, the ranchos are terrible

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If anyone lands here looking for an update - the problem wasnt with the hose, the clamp, etc... I purchased a metal Thermostat housing that just must not of been made to spec. It just wouldn't plug up the hose.. Went back to a plastic cheap housing - leak fixed. Some plumbers tape carefully placed in tandem with a clamp likely would've gotten the job done.   Best,
    • For anyone following, this is what I have deduced from this forum - and my very specific niche case. Please do let me know if you see me going in the wrong direction here. For context, I have a 16 sierra 1500 w/t. Has TC and Cargo light switches. Removed the switch to find the X1 and X2 of the S48A connection populated with wires (x1 10-14, and x2 1-5).   Took photos of the X61A-X5 to find the wires from S48A-X1 land here at their respective pins (10, 11, 17, 23 on the X5). Was hopeful that this means my X51A fuse box has the appropriate pins... No cigar. So now I will be routing wires from the rear of the X61A-X1 to the engine bay and to their respective negative relay triggers. Please see to the diagram. If any has insight as to where the S48A-X2 pins 4 and 5 land that would be awesome.   Note: please disregard fuse sizes. Main fuse will like be 25A, all mini bus fuses will likely be 10-15A   Cheers
    • 287,500 Mile Service   8/13/2026   Reset Fuel Trims   Since the work done in the previous post there was a good improvement in response in all areas except right after a fill up where the LTFT would go -20%+ for about four miles while the STFT was near neutral. Before the work they both went very negative for a few miles after a fill up but act normal thereafter.    We did a systems check of the vapor recovery system for functionality and ability to hold a vacuum. That checked out fine. But this doesn't mean the charcoal canister is dead in the water. Testing that is next up. For now the reset of the fuel trims.    I intentionally shorted the fill exactly two gallons to eliminate any chance of filling the canister. On start up the trims were behaving normally until I got up and rolling where the LTFT went -10 / -11%% but the short was + 2 to 0%. Within a mile the the STFT offset the LTFT and by 2 miles they were neutral. HUGE improvement but still not hunky-dory.    I'll watch them for a few days. Perhaps another tank where I will fill completely to 'first click' and compare. Meanwhile on the hunt for a new canister and I'll toss another purge value at it for good measure. Pending the outcome of the canister test that is. Progress of any kind is welcome.    Fuel economy improvement with bringing hole #3 back to the living was a noticeable bump to the positive. Even on the few miles I drove after the refill I already see another bump up by the trims reset.     She's purring like a kitten with a warm bowl of milk.    BTW, adding 50 rpm to the idle took the majority of the negative timing out on cold start up and leaned the cold idle. No longer burbles in the cat. What a dumb way to heat a cat.      
    • Yeah, shame I can’t really get that filter easily anymore. Running a PureOne. Your fave!    TAN would be neat to see. Confirmation I ran it too long probably. 🤣
    • My son and I both bought new trucks in 2017. Both of us immediately put Truck Covers USA American Roll Covers on our trucks. My son still has his truck and it never sees the inside of a garage. We live in Alabama, so not much snow. My truck was my daily driver and was in the garage when I wasn't driving it or at work. No issues with either cover even after almost 9 years. About a year ago I sold my truck to my brother and bought a 2025 Silverado 2500. The second thing that I put on that truck was a new Truck Covers USA cover. They are very well made and have a very positive locking system. I looked at a Retrax and my concern was the way that the cover locked to the rail. BTW, the first thing I put on the new truck was step bars. Those new trucks are high!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...