Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

  • Like 4
Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

Appreciate it buddy! Loving it so far. I agree, the updated front ends on these trucks look amazing.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

 

I find that hard to believe. I have seen plenty, most contain large rims, low profile stretched tires mud tires, big lifts and painted under carriage pieces and a host of lights. I have also seen a few overly done autozone special stripe/chrome/emblem editions...

 

I like that truck, especially the color and many others but have seen plenty of ugly ones. In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly but can certainly be improved or dressed properly, headlights are too small for that truck. Though I thought the 99-06 style was good looking, they tried to follow the same design theme with the current style, problem is the front ends got larger so it looks out of balance on some levels.

 

Certainly enjoy seeing the different ideas and trucks people do.

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

 

In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly....

 

I agree that the 2014-15s are the best looking of the new body style. I drive by the dealer daily and see all those Darth Vader front ends and am happy I needed a new truck in 2014 and not now.

Posted

Just installed a moto fab 2.5in leveling kit. Extremely happy with the results but the front end is a little higher then the rear so I will be replacing the read blocks next. Any suggestions on what size blocks to get?

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I used the rear blocks that came with my 2.5 RCX kit (2" blocks, I believe). They were about 1/2" taller than the stock blocks if I recall correctly.

 

For towing, you can't beat the Firestone RideRite air bags. Run them at 5psi for everyday driving, then pump them up to 100psi for max load. I find with about 35psi in the bags, I can tow my 5000# tractor with a level stance. Eliminates the azz sag and gives more steering control.

 

I did not install the onboard compressor but I have an air compressor in my garage, so it's easy to air up.

 

Try them and change your life!

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Didn't attach a picture to my last post...

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

30,000 miles on truck now with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

 

30,000 with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

Posted

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

10-4

 

Sweet deal. I tow about 3500 lbs when I tow. Running 80 mph, 305 tires get ~ 11mpg.

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yessir ill shoot you some pictures. I am ordering them today from Amazon.

Posted

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haven't noticed anything yet! Rides similar to stock. Tires may it a tad more rough, but that's expected. I'm going to replace the rear shocks anyways, the ranchos are terrible

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • She's laughing all the way to the bank.
    • There's a new PI on 2023-2026 L3B shudder.  Possible faulty front oxygen sensor.   Dealer can pull up PIP6060A and give it a read.  
    • Also here's the drive cycle for a 2021 Yukon with V8.  DO NOT USE THE CRUISE CONTROL WHEN RUNNING DRIVE CYCLE!!!!!:   Warning: Road test a vehicle under safe conditions and while obeying all traffic laws. Do not attempt any maneuvers that could jeopardize vehicle control. Failure to adhere to these precautions could lead to serious personal injury and vehicle damage. Note: You have completed this procedure when all parameters display Complete. Short stops for traffic will not affect the procedure. Note: Do NOT use cruise control during this procedure. Ignition/Vehicle » Off — For greater than 8 h Verify the scan tool parameter: Cold Start-Up = Yes If not the specified state Ignition/Vehicle » Off — For greater than 8 h & Repeat this step If the specified state Ignition » On / Vehicle » In Service Mode — For 1 min Engine » Idling — For 2 min Drive the vehicle while maintaining the following conditions for 20 min: Part Throttle Vehicle Speed = 24 to 97 km/h (15 to 60 MPH) Safely stop the vehicle Operate the engine/vehicle within the following conditions: Accelerate the vehicle to 64 km/h (40 MPH) Accelerate the vehicle from 64 to 97 km/h (40 to 60 MPH) @ Throttle position between 10% and 13% Release the accelerator pedal and let the vehicle coast down with the brake pedal released — For greater than 20 s Accelerate the vehicle from 64 to 97 km/h (40 to 60 MPH) @ Throttle position between 13% and 16% Release the accelerator pedal and let the vehicle coast down with the brake pedal released — For greater than 20 s Accelerate the vehicle from 64 to 97 km/h (40 to 60 MPH) @ Throttle position between 16% and 19% Release the accelerator pedal and let the vehicle coast down with the brake pedal released — For greater than 20 s Accelerate the vehicle from 64 to 97 km/h (40 to 60 MPH) @ Throttle position between 19% and 22% Release the accelerator pedal and let the vehicle coast down with the brake pedal released — For greater than 20 s Accelerate the vehicle from 64 to 97 km/h (40 to 60 MPH) @ Throttle position between 22% and 25% Release the accelerator pedal and let the vehicle coast down with the brake pedal released — For greater than 20 s Maintain steady state throttle at 89 km/h (55 MPH) — For 10 min Safely stop the vehicle
    • About the only GM that compares well with its competitors through the small to midsize vehicles is the Trax. I would like nothing better to just drive GMs. My wife in a Cadillac me in a Chevy minivan and Colorado. Part of my day is comprised of reading and watching comparisons of automobile. I could buy a car today. I’m back to research the next. 
    • Do you have any DFM defeat devices like the Range modules?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...