Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

  • Like 4
Posted

IMG_0061_zps2twb77rz.jpg

 

2" level the dealership put on. Dont know the brand they used, but it's the spacer that goes on the bottom of the strut. I couldn't find any branding on it.

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

Appreciate it buddy! Loving it so far. I agree, the updated front ends on these trucks look amazing.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

CW,

 

That is just stunning! I've said it before here that I haven't seen an ugly 2014+ GM ot Chevy yet.

 

I find that hard to believe. I have seen plenty, most contain large rims, low profile stretched tires mud tires, big lifts and painted under carriage pieces and a host of lights. I have also seen a few overly done autozone special stripe/chrome/emblem editions...

 

I like that truck, especially the color and many others but have seen plenty of ugly ones. In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly but can certainly be improved or dressed properly, headlights are too small for that truck. Though I thought the 99-06 style was good looking, they tried to follow the same design theme with the current style, problem is the front ends got larger so it looks out of balance on some levels.

 

Certainly enjoy seeing the different ideas and trucks people do.

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

 

In some trims the 2016 silverado is ugly....

 

I agree that the 2014-15s are the best looking of the new body style. I drive by the dealer daily and see all those Darth Vader front ends and am happy I needed a new truck in 2014 and not now.

Posted

Just installed a moto fab 2.5in leveling kit. Extremely happy with the results but the front end is a little higher then the rear so I will be replacing the read blocks next. Any suggestions on what size blocks to get?

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I used the rear blocks that came with my 2.5 RCX kit (2" blocks, I believe). They were about 1/2" taller than the stock blocks if I recall correctly.

 

For towing, you can't beat the Firestone RideRite air bags. Run them at 5psi for everyday driving, then pump them up to 100psi for max load. I find with about 35psi in the bags, I can tow my 5000# tractor with a level stance. Eliminates the azz sag and gives more steering control.

 

I did not install the onboard compressor but I have an air compressor in my garage, so it's easy to air up.

 

Try them and change your life!

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Didn't attach a picture to my last post...

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Awesome info. Do you know of any ill affects from having a 2.5" level, rear blocks (say 2-3") and the air bags? Currently I have a 2.5" front level with 305 55 tires. I'm 1" high in the front. When I load my trailer on it, the rear sags even more. I'd like to use the blocks for level everyday driving, then the bags for when I tow.

 

Does your truck have rear blocks? Thanks

 

30,000 miles on truck now with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

 

30,000 with level + rear blocks and air bags and no issues. I absolutely can't stand a truck that sags in the rear especially when the bed is empty (aka 2" levels).

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Wow. 30,000lbs with a half ton??!

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

Posted

Miles.

 

My tractor is about 5000# and my trailer 2000#, so the most I have towed is ~7000#. Put it in tow mode and set the cruise to 65...get about 9mpg.

10-4

 

Sweet deal. I tow about 3500 lbs when I tow. Running 80 mph, 305 tires get ~ 11mpg.

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Your truck looks very similar to mine in that I have the 2.5" front and looking for rear blocks. Can you shoot some pics after adding read blocks? Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yessir ill shoot you some pictures. I am ordering them today from Amazon.

Posted

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I did the same front with 3" rear block. About 1.25" rake

 

967faae731cc13e85ee3289441037092.jpg

 

234bc5d7e2bd47a3ebb37ec415bd2ded.jpg

 

Like the way that sits, any problems with the springs maxing going over bumps or anything with the 3in blocks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haven't noticed anything yet! Rides similar to stock. Tires may it a tad more rough, but that's expected. I'm going to replace the rear shocks anyways, the ranchos are terrible

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • BEAUTIFUL!! That a Cutlass F85? Or 442? My side-ID skills are lacking thanks to failing memory, lol. Love that color & year, too!   Yeah I was never big on entering my own stuff, but I always liked seeing what everyone had, the rare models, and what's been modified. That was always fun. These days I have barely enough time to do what needs to be done at home.    Oddly enough, here in MA there are more car shows than ever in history! You'd think up here it would be dead, but it's bigger than EVER!          Took the 940 for its maiden voyage with the carburetor. At first I couldn't get out of the yard! This originally had the "Bosch" system (our other 940 has Regina - single fuel pump in fuel tank, and space-age-looking ignition coil on driver's fender) - that has dual fuel pumps. One in the tank, and one under the center left of the vehicle. I had unplugged the external one thinking I wouldn't need it with the carburetor ... but the way I have the pressure regulator hooked up, 90% of the fuel volume is going back to the fuel tank, so cranked all the way down, the regulator is only supplying a hair above 3.5 PSI to the carb. Turns out the in-tank pump (15 PSI alone, instead of 45) couldn't handle the load. Plugged it back in and went for a rip. Ran great!   Throttle response is always amazing with carburetors. ZERO delay that no FI system can reproduce. Also fires up in half the crank rotations as before. Low end power was DRAMATICALLY improved. There was an ongoing lean issue with the FI that I got tired of figuring out, so this is a MASSIVE improvement! Above 50 MPH on hills it feels SUPER weak, though. This is more than likely due to the timing not being advanced enough by the computer, since it believes there are multiple failures. I can live with that through the winter. Will keep me from passing slowpokes where I shouldn't and getting speeding tickets at least. 😁
    • I like driver quality. I bought a 64 elcamino a few years ago. All original as it turned out. I didn’t know at the time. I made a low ball offer and got it. Black on black factory air 4 speed. It drove like a school bus. It had been awhile I had forgotten just how bad the old cars drove. So I planned on making it more of a retro ride. I would drive it to work sometimes. My brother liked to build cars, I liked to drive them race them. So he noticed the canister oil filter and open blow by tube. He checked the numbers. All original. 327, 250 hp close 4 speed, posi rear end. I put it on eBay made a tidy profit. I didn’t want the responsibility or headache. My wife already had a pristine collector vehicle. It lives in the climate controlled garage. I really don’t care what it is. I like to feel the sensation of speed. Let someone else have the responsibility. I’m too OCD. It used to drive me crazy. I can appreciate people who like to take the responsibility. I’m glad they do. I’ll look and remember back to those days. I’ll jump in the wife’s Genesis to get gas for her. Get my sensation of speed and be happy for awhile. 
    • 2014 silverado work truck 5.3. 
    • I’ve had plenty of nice cars but car shows have never really been my thing personally. I’d much rather be driving or wrenching. But over the years I’ve noticed they are dying out. This one has even been canceled in the past. Hate to see that happen so I brought my Olds out for the afternoon. If turnout was really bad I had the TRX on standby too but thankfully quite a few nice rigs showed up. Nice people too. I may be converted.
    • What year, what model, what engine?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...