Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good looking truck! Did you remove the stock rear block? I have 2.5" level in front and ride about 1" high without a trailer load. I want to add a rear block.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Posted

 

Yes I have the RC rear block in there. However I still have 1" of rake, every truck must be slightly different. Only I can tell though, because I look at it all the time and it kind of annoys me but its definitely better to have for towing

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Cool. Thanks for the follow up. I went with a ProRyde adjustable leveling kit and nothing in the back. The front is leveled 2.5" and it sits 1" high up front. ProRyde makes a rear block that is 1-3/4" so in removing the 1" stock block I should be very close to level or maybe even a very slight rake, maybe 3/4"? How does the truck ride with the rear block added and stock removed? I'm running 305 55 20. AT2

 

Thanks . Slick looking truck

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks, again I can't notice much difference from the stock ride. I'm running 295/55/R20 AT2. It's a little bouncy over speed bumps which is annoying but I don't think that's anything to do with the level

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

Posted (edited)

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Posted (edited)

 

out of curiosity.... wont a fully loaded bed change the alignment? Even if you lower the truck and have it aligned with a dry weight. Once you put 2000lbs you'll load the front suspension. You may not be in positive camber but negative. It actually sounds to me that you would need a helper spring on the rear suspension or a weight distributive trailer.

Yes you are correct. I guess I was hoping removing the upper spacer wouldn't put he suspension so close to the end of its limits. I didn't have this problem prior to the leveling kit Edited by sensinitas
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is where I was a little while ago but kept researching as I didn't have the funds and was waiting to buy new tires. Since then, I decided that the Bilsteins are not really adjustable. You pick a height, install, align and hope you picked the right height! If you get it wrong, you have to remove the shock, adjust and reinstall. It is more labour intensive to replace a shock than a bottom spacer. Instead of buying an add-a-leaf kit. my local spring shop will fabricate one to my particular height and load specifications. When I buy my next set of tires I'm going to have a 1.5" bottom of strut kit installed and have a leaf added when/if I get another trailer!

Posted

Anyone have pics of a before and after of someone that started with the 2" level, then added the top spacer to go to 2.5"? I'm trying to determine how noticeable the extra 0.5" is. I already have the parts for the 2", but I'd have to order the top spacer so I'm wondering if it's worth it.

 

You can't tell the .5 difference so it's only worth it if you are going to push the limits on your tire size. .5 will be important if you want to run 295 or 305.....not so much if you want to run 275 or 285.

Posted

So based on everything I've read so far, I'm pretty much decided on getting the bilstein ride height adjustable shocks and an add a leaf in the rear for when i occasionally carry a load. My question is which add-a-leaf kit is good for our trucks?

 

Add a leaf kits will ruin your ride.....better put in some glue on your teeth. Air bags are a better option for occasional weight in the rear.

Posted

So my review of the RC 2.5" front only kit - took me a bit to get used to the new look. After a bit, I loved it. However, for work I drive 2-3k miles at a time with a loaded bed. The loaded bed caused the front to sit up even higher, extending the suspension even further, causing the front wheels to positive camber out. I've completely worn out the outside of my tires. My plan is to remove the upper strut spacer this week, get an alignment, and see if that helps a bit.

 

Why not add the rear block or extra leaf?

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgpost-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

post-144875-146794408759_thumb.jpg

Posted

Looking for a little advise. I installed Motofab 1.5 lower spacer about 4K miles ago and I am happy with the way it sits. Ride has gotten a little rough now with 14k miles. It seems like I can feel every bump on every road. Question is do I go with Fox 2.0 or replace the Goodyear SRA's to smooth out the ride. I was waiting to see about the Bilstein 6112 but couldn't wait. Had to level it. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. cc714ca2b9b9826c5d4a92db47d62877.jpgattachicon.gifImage1467944086.161079.jpg

Those SRA's are probably the softest tire you're going to get. I think you should drive something with an LT tire for a week then hop back in yours and realize it's not that bad. It's all relevant, it tends to seem worse than it is if it's bothering you.

 

Consider the bilstein 5100s ?

Posted

Haven't seen many that think the 5100's improve the ride. I would stay with P rated Nitto or Toyo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
    • The use of absolutes like "always" to describe gear selection, and giving free advice at a boat ramp sounds like a recipe for disaster. It's a boat ramp, not a farm, for starters.   IMO gear selection should depend on the obstacle. If low range is working and this is a slower speed, controlled ordeal, I'd keep using that.
    • I had a boat for many years, never had a problem even with a 2 wheel drive 93 Silvy for 20 years. Good tires, proper use of the gas pedal worked.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...