Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

5300029c3db12c0af261b3af35a1d2f6.jpg

 

2 level. 275/60/20 bfg ko2. Fuel coupler gloss black.

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted

Stock w/ 275/65/20 KO'2s. Running at 35psi

 

Your harsh ride is because of the LT tire not the level. 10 ply tire rides rough compared to stock tires. See a lot of guys thinking the rougher ride is due to the level and not the LT tires they just added too.

Posted

Agree and disagree, my truck rode much stiffer with the 2.5" RC and stock SRA tires than it does now with my 6" lift with 35" MT tires.

 

Your harsh ride is because of the LT tire not the level. 10 ply tire rides rough compared to stock tires. See a lot of guys thinking the rougher ride is due to the level and not the LT tires they just added too.

Posted (edited)

 

Your harsh ride is because of the LT tire not the level. 10 ply tire rides rough compared to stock tires. See a lot of guys thinking the rougher ride is due to the level and not the LT tires they just added too.

 

 

Your harsh ride is because of the LT tire not the level. 10 ply tire rides rough compared to stock tires. See a lot of guys thinking the rougher ride is due to the level and not the LT tires they just added too.

I disagree with your tire theory. It had a 2" level with no added block and rode great......... But thanks anyway.

Edited by mmwest
Posted

If the dealer installs the level... warranty problem solved...
Just saying.
And since most dealers will install these level kits, you would think they wouldn't raise a stink about them when something wears out prematurely.
If it was that big of an issue, and it was guaranteed to cause something to fail early, they wouldn't install them if they knew it meant a warranty cost for them in the future.

Posted

 

No tire theory bud. Fact. LT tires ride rougher then P tires.

 

 

The tires themselves decreases ride quality but,

The level itself decreases ride quality as well.

 

No debate.

Posted

For those of you adding leveling kits and new tires, what kind of MPG hit are you taking? If I buy a 5.3 CC and add a 2.25 leveling kit, and stay with factory tires, will I take much of a hit? I know well the issues of adding heavier tires and losing MPG's, have done it for many years. But if I keep factory tires, will I see a hit at all?

 

2 other questions. With all the complaints about vibration problems, are you guys with leveling kits having more issues, the same, or no way to tell?

 

What is the weight of the factory 275/55R20 Goodforayear tires? I looked and believe I found the answer to be 41lbs? Anyone know for sure?

Posted

I have seen zero mpg loss. I can still cruise on the highway and get 20-24 mpg to show up on my 50 mile average. That's which stock tires and 2.25 level. Also no vibrations of any kind from my level that I installed myself.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

305 55 20 w 2.5" level, Toyo AT2 extreme, minimal road noise, slight reduce ride quality due to vibration, 16-17 mph best mileage on highway w cruise on. 6.2L motor half ton 4wd

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

RC 2.5 with rear block went on today along with new wheels.

Moto Metal 20x9 MO970 Black/Machined 0 offset

Toyo Open Country ATII 295/55/R20

I noticed a slight rub in reverse on the mud flaps but when I got home and looked while my sister steered the truck in reverse, it seems to barely clear... I mean you could barely fit a hair between the tire and the flap. Might have to do some trimming but I couldn't be happier with how everything turned out!

 

IMG_0478_zps1wm0e0yv.jpg

IMG_0480_zpsyxhzm4j6.jpgIMG_0485_zps1047mndi.jpg

IMG_0483_zpsxf9ocx2g.jpg

IMG_0484_zpsz7bmuayb.jpg

 

Good looking truck! Did you remove the stock rear block? I have 2.5" level in front and ride about 1" high without a trailer load. I want to add a rear block.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Looks? Can easily tell it is. Never seen a stock truck with 3.5" of stock rake (2014+ half tons). What was the stock fender measurements and what are they now? I am guessing about an inch nose high? Mine had 2 inch stock rake, most have 2-205" stock rake.

 

Should add a 2 inch rear block to give it a level stance and get your headlights closer to correct.

 

Tyler

Mine sits about a 1" high in front with 2.5" up front and nothing done to the rear. Should I remove the rear stock block and add the 2" block to give it more level look? Will that help?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I spent countless hours on the forums and looking at available kits. I wanted something that did not change highway ride quality and also improved off road capability. I ended up going with Camburg's 2.5 coilover kit. I absolutely love this kit, it drives great on road and amazing off road. .

 

https://camburg.com/shop/suspension/fox-chevy-1500-2wd-4wd-07-14-factory-2-5-kit/

 

post-159851-0-96159700-1467663451_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-03319800-1467663480_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-96159700-1467663451_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-03319800-1467663480_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-96159700-1467663451_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-03319800-1467663480_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-96159700-1467663451_thumb.jpg

post-159851-0-03319800-1467663480_thumb.jpg

Edited by Headqrts66
  • Like 3
Posted

I spent countless hours on the forums and looking at available kits. I wanted something that did not change ride performance and also improved off road capability. I ended up going with Camburg's 2.5 coilover kit. I absolutely love this kit, it drives great on road and amazing off road. .

 

https://camburg.com/shop/suspension/fox-chevy-1500-2wd-4wd-07-14-factory-2-5-kit/

 

attachicon.gif#2a.jpg

attachicon.gif#4a.jpg

That looks like a sick leveling kit ! Just pricey
Posted

So just to recap all the back and forth. The lower level kits are preferred to the upper? It seems to me that it makes for an easier install job. I haven't crawled underneath to see what kind of control arms I have (2016 z71 LT). But amazon has a same day delivery for $59 for the Rough Country lower levels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 497 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
    • from another thread   Update...although the truck sometimes seems to idle weird and the transmission shift a little weird, I've driven about 7,000  miles and no issues.   However, the way GM has handled my rental reimbursement, the situation when my truck quit, and the recall in general has led me to this point...I have driven a GM vehicle for the past 46 years and unless I buy a C3 Corvette, this is the last GM vehicle I will ever own. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...