Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

The Catch Can hoses should be routed in this manner.

I have a 5.3 so my connections are different.

Posted (edited)

I have a 5.3 so my connections are different.

Sorry, I thought you were asking about a 6.2L.

Edited by Elite Engineering
Posted

Sorry, I thought you were asking about a 6.2L. Here's a diagram for the 5.3L V8

The hose from under throttle body goes to the inlet of the can and hose from the side of the can outlet goes to the connection half way down the drivers side intake manifold on a 5.3L with the elite engineering can.

Posted

The hose from under throttle body goes to the inlet of the can and hose from the side of the can outlet goes to the connection half way down the drivers side intake manifold on a 5.3L with the elite engineering can.

This sounds backwards when looking at the diagram from Elite. The 'clean air' outlet from catch can should be going to throttle body.

Posted

This sounds backwards when looking at the diagram from Elite. The 'clean air' outlet from catch can should be going to throttle body.

 

It would go to the top of the throttle body on the 6.2. On the 5.3, it should go to the side of the engine halfway down the intake manifold. The port below the throttle body goes to the inlet port of all catch cans.

Posted

 

It would go to the top of the throttle body on the 6.2. On the 5.3, it should go to the side of the engine halfway down the intake manifold. The port below the throttle body goes to the inlet port of all catch cans.

 

This is correct!

Posted

Does anyone know if I can run seafoam in this same like on my 5.3 to clean the valves? Or any other product people suggest?

Posted

Seafoam makes a spray can cleaner wiith a 90 degree plastic on the long hose. I and some other have used it.

Posted

Does anyone know if I can run seafoam in this same like on my 5.3 to clean the valves? Or any other product people suggest?

I used the sea foam and also crc intake valve cleaner. I used the sea foam because I couldn't find the crc intake valve cleaner the first time.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Did you just stick the hose into the throttle body?

I took off the top half of the air box and sprayed it through there.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Emptied my can yesterday after 500 miles. A lot of nasty gunk. Temps have been in the 30s-40s for most of the time I had it on. Though the past few days have been 50ish.

 

I really hope it's not that much every 500 miles....

 

 

ac7ce1df8edac2487ec95ea8a83c0635.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Someone needs to pin the routing for the 5.3L and 6.2L...on the front page or something. I think it would curb some questions and help people find the answer MUCH quicker.

 

BTW, I'm brainstorming another way to keep the backside of the valves cleaner, I hope someone else beats me to it. I'm waiting on taxes to return and about to call Devils Own.

Edited by 14'SilveradoLT
Posted (edited)

For anyone who's thinking the ebay catch cans are garbage, you may be wasting a lot of money on the expensive ones.

 

Edited by projectsummit

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...