Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As long as you get the single you will be fine their double is made for supercharged (camaro ZL1)

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Thanks everyone for your reply's I appreciate it. I will be ordering one right now :D

Posted (edited)

So has anyone looked into BG cleaning services for DI engines? I was speaking to a trusted mechanic friend of mine last night about his take on oil catch cans. While he agreed they do help, he said they don't catch 100% of everything and stuff will still get through the can. In his opinion, you still should be cleaning these engines out about once a year or every 15,000 miles to keep them clean and functioning in tip top shape. He said an oil catch can would definitely help and he'd be glad to install one for me if I wanted one, but in his opinion it would be a waste of money from the standpoint that I would still need to clean the engine out anyway. He's a pretty knowledgeable GM guy and I trust his opinion. I will also add that I mainly commute to work in my truck with the occasional hauling/towing in doing home projects throughout the year so I don't push the vehicle very hard. I'm sure if I was towing more often and did some performance upgrades to get more speed and power, that increases the likelihood of oil blow by and deposits forming on the valves so an oil catch can would definitely be a good upgrade in that scenario. But it basically won't eliminate the need to clean the engine 100%.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

I'm seriously thinking about adding some meth/alky injection to the AFE pipe and a catch can....between the two the DI engine should be good to go without a cleaning for a pretty good while.

Posted

Please explain this cleaning service.

 

It's a two part system. One is a cleaner that gets pumped through your fuel system at the gas tank, the other is a cleaner that goes in through the throttle body to clean off the valves where the carbon build up usually occurs. BG's website explains it more and the mechanic could explain it better than I can. Here's a video of the service:

 

 

Posted

Honestly I'll probably still add a catch can to help keep things clean but I'll probably wait until after my first BG cleaning service at 15,000 miles sometime next year

Posted

I have a couple of old catch cans in the garage I bought off ebay earlier this year and never installed on my last car. The were $20 a piece and really nice construction, I may have to plumb one in.

 

On another note, what about good old seafoam? I have seafoamed a lot of my vehicles over the years with great success, just always changed plugs out afterwords worried that they would keep all the residue from cleaning. I would think a good old seafoam treatment would have the same benefits?

Posted

As I stated before I'm going to setup an on vehicle spray system using old nitrous kit parts for this reason. My plan is to use seafoam to do the cleaning $10 or so a bottle and rather than doing these rough one time cleanings. I'll spray it from time to time to keep under control more like a normal injection system would. I thought of another thing I could do with it, I can make it smoke on command. Most people will think it blew up. LOL

 

There is a way to reduce this issue by a lot more. disconnect the case from the intake and use a scavenger system. This idea will really piss of any tree huggers and won't work for you in those Nazi states with emissions. This will have the biggest impact without cleaning however do to reversion in the intake it will still need cleaning.

Posted (edited)

Ok so the BG service is actually a 3 part process, not 2. The products used are BG Fuel Injection System Cleaner, BG 44k Fuel system cleaner, and BG ISC Induction System cleaner. It took the mechanic about an hour to hour and a half to do it right. Materials for my wife's Hyundai accent were about $60 and labor was about $100. I'm thinking for a silverado you'd have a little extra labor for time but probably most of the cost difference would be in more of the cleaning compounds since it's a V8 instead of a V4.

 

Obviously one cleaning is nearly the price of the catch can. But if you plan on keeping the truck for a long time, it makes sense to do it once a year whether you have a catch can or not. I could see the catch can reducing how much crud has to be cleaned out and maybe you can do the cleaning service every 30,000 miles instead of 15,000. But I think in the long term there's really no way to avoid 100% any type of cleaning of the engine.

 

As I said I'll probably add a catch can later and continue to do the yearly cleaning service.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

Just a disclaimer, "these one time cleanings" are not usually recommended very often. The reason is because small carbon deposits can get caught near/on the rings and then scar the cylinder walls.

 

These cleanings work well----but just remember---it's probably better to keep it as clean as possible.

Posted

Just a disclaimer, "these one time cleanings" are not usually recommended very often. The reason is because small carbon deposits can get caught near/on the rings and then scar the cylinder walls.

 

These cleanings work well----but just remember---it's probably better to keep it as clean as possible.

 

I understand your point, but I'd argue cleaning them MORE often would prevent the problem you describe. In other words cleaning a small amount of deposits once a year is better than waiting 50,000 miles and forcing way more "crud" through the system at one time. BG will actually warranty your engine if you do the yearly cleaning service with their product.....they stand behind it.

  • Like 1
Posted

exactly. Also, it the more layers there are the less likely this none manual style of cleaning will get everything off the valve. If it's good for 7 layers and you have 10, lets just say, you will still have 3 layers after the cleaning. I guess it would be more of thickness, but I think you can get the point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...