Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
The weather was decent the other day so I swapped my summers back on, gave her a good wash and decided to take off the lower bumper spoiler, looks much better!
3.thumb.jpg.af0e091d4be24e3ce18da13abb0c96e7.jpg
2.thumb.jpg.af59b7bb74160f231a34b6f178837a24.jpg

What wheel tire combo do you have?! Is it just leveled?! That is the look I wanna go for and need ideas! Thanks in advance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

b957c1900c3ddd12ebaf64de93a2b22f.jpg


2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L
4.5" Zone
22x10 American Force Grips
33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers
Instagram @wildchevys

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Jeremyv said:


What wheel tire combo do you have?! Is it just leveled?! That is the look I wanna go for and need ideas! Thanks in advance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup, it’s just leveled, 2.5” I believe, not sure what brand, the dealer installed it before I bought the truck. My wheels are 18x9 -12 Ultra Hunter. Tires are K02s, 275/70/18

Edited by Scottyz71
Posted
Yup, it’s just leveled, 2.5” I believe, not sure what brand, the dealer installed it before I bought the truck. My wheels are 18x9 -12 Ultra Hunter. Tires are K02s, 275/70/18

That’s exactly what I was gonna do 18x9 -12 with a level. I thought it would look great and this just confirmed my thoughts! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

2016 z71 - Bilstein 5100 (1.85" setting) all around, 18x9 0 offset Pro-Comp Rockwells wrapped in 285/65r18 e-rated Falken Wildpeaks. Kinda wish I would have gone 275/70r18- more specs in the sig link
725b7948f99ea2db55d5b8372f9fe315.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by FHLH
adding info
Posted

My new to me 2014, my last crew cab is a 1990. This is a pretty big jump in creature comfort. So far I love it! 

Screenshot_2018-03-16-16-45-51.png

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/27/2018 at 3:15 PM, Crazy Schooner said:

IMG_5149-X3.jpg

IMG_5096-X3.jpg

That tent is pretty cool. My usual issue with those type of tents that are in the back of the truck is that you lose the use of your box which is kinda essential when camping.. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I have plenty of room for wood, camping gear and whatever else I need when camping. I don't loose any functionality but having an actual truck bed out back helps with that.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Crazy Schooner said:

I have plenty of room for wood, camping gear and whatever else I need when camping. I don't loose any functionality but having an actual truck bed out back helps with that.

Exactly! That's what wrong with the typical ones.. You loose the functionality of your box and you either have to pack your cab full of stuff or carry it in a trailer behind.. And at that point you may as well buy a tent or travel trailer because you end up towing something anyhow. Unless of course you're a seasoned backcountry camper and have equipment that's very compact and light... but I mean if that's what you're into you're not likely going to want a tent in the box of your truck anyhow. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...